The only rule in fashion is that there are no rules.
Not exact matches
Whether you choose red or a more neutral tone, this style
rule is definitely one to follow
in as it will not
only leave you looking longer, but will have you looking like an instant
fashion icon
I was probably the
only girl
in high school who was more than content with the dress code (with slight
rule breakers of course) and despite my interest
in fashion and the constant need to be the first one to try something new as a blogger or always do something different, I've always felt more comfortable when I'm wearing my wardrobe staples.
In the 21st century, the
only rule that ignites brighter than other
fashion regulations is that everything is fashionable as long as you are stylish about it.
Adidas, which happens to be one of the best and overtly overrated sports
fashion brand
in the world, not
only rules the preferences of guys but of girls as well, and is becoming increasingly preferred by commoners as well as celebrities who just can not miss out on including at least one Adidas accessory
in their outfit.
If I told you, «
fashion rules are made to be broken» it would be not
only be the lamest cliché
in the book, but also the worst possible advice I could give you.
The latter,
in its judgement of September 2010 (grudgingly) adopted the reasoning of the Court of Justice (so adieu to the ius cogens standard) and found
in favour of Mr Kadi,
ruling that the Commission had
only paid heed to fundamental rights considerations
in the most marginal
fashion.
ICBC appealed and Mr. Justice Myers overturned the earlier
ruling noting the Court can
only address this issue when determining liability and can not address this defense
in a piecemeal
fashion.
Although the above suggests a co-operative relationship between the courts and the law societies, and distinct roles for each, it fails to acknowledge that both institutions are,
in fact, regulating precisely the same area of lawyer conduct (albeit for different ends) and that the judiciary, beginning with Martin v. Gray
in 1990, has inserted itself as a regulator
in this area
in an unprecedented
fashion which has led to significant changes
in how conflict of interests are regulated not
only by the courts but also by law society
rules.