You only see possibilities when others think you have no way forward.
Not exact matches
That is defensible
only if one is certain that the baseline level of possible robotic error in civilian protection exceeds that baseline level of human error... I, for one, would not bet against the
possibility that for some military applications, we will some day come to
see mere human judgment as guaranteeing an unacceptable level of indiscriminate and disproportionate violence.
Whether or not the endeavour works or not remains to be
seen, but tablets and their underlying technologies are making such new story - telling forms possible — and we've
only scratched the surface of
possibilities.
Amid the exhaustion, though, I
saw elation — a deep satisfaction that I suspect came from redefining her idea of
possibility that can
only come from overcoming a challenge in something you value.
«We are
only seeing the tip of the iceberg when it comes to
possibilities in this area.»
we
only have wait and
see, are you confident enough to make sure this statement allways show up, or are you to scared of its
possibility of being true?
I think the
possibility is there for such an awakening to happen â $ «but we
only see slithers of light as it is.
I entertain the
possibility that all will be saved
only because I do not
see how one can come face to face with Divine Love without being overcome by a desire to be embraced by it.
To read the gospel with an open mind is to
see beyond all
possibility of doubt that Jesus came to bring us new truths concerning our destiny: not
only a new life superior to that we are conscious of, but also in a very real sense a new physical power of acting upon our temporal world.
From your statement I
see you actually can't prove anyone is born gay but
only point, by the means of research that still can't PROVE a person is born gay, to the
possibility that they could be born gay.
It is possible not
only in a theoretical sense and not
only for a few, but it presents itself as a real chooseable
possibility to many people who could never
see the radical response as a live option.
God will not
only absorb the effects of the human misuse of power, but will «look bad» in the eyes of those who think that God's
possibilities should not be so limited (
see 1 Cor 1:26 - 31)(See Fretheim, The Suffering of God, 7
see 1 Cor 1:26 - 31)(
See Fretheim, The Suffering of God, 7
See Fretheim, The Suffering of God, 76).
«The «primordial nature» of God is the concrescence of a unity of conceptual feelings» (PR 134), which «achieves, in its unity of satisfaction, the complete conceptual valuation of all eternal objects» (PR 48) or pure forms, thereby generating the entire structuring of pure
possibility.4
Seen in terms of his everlasting aspect or consequent nature, however, the
only way God is directly related to the World, the converse is true.
If you choose to go this way, there are
only two
possibilities: either you deceive yourself about yourself, forgetting that you are a sinful man, confusing the demands of God with the standards of middle - class integrity and thus satisfying yourself; or you really take God's will seriously and fall into despair when you
see that you can never be just before that will.
Only if we
see a man in his concrete otherness is there any
possibility of our confirming him in his individuality as that which he must become.
We, too, glimpse the
possibilities that any experience generates, but we usually
see only some of them and we may not rank them accurately.
Only in the rarest instances have scholars
seen fit to explore the
possibility of a fruitful interchange between the fundamental ideas of these two seminal...
«Don't be scared of what you can not
see, Your
only fear is
possibility, Never wonder what the hell went wrong, Your second chance may never come along.
Hume's claim that logical and real
possibility are distinguished
only by a habit of the mind (we are not in the habit of
seeing billiard balls vanish when struck by other billiard balls, so we do not think that is a «real»
possibility) is not universally accepted.
The Renaissance, the other wing that came out of the breakup of the medieval synthesis,
saw human nature
only as a realm of limitless
possibilities.
But let there be revealed to us the
possibility of believing at the same time and wholly in God and the World, the one through the other; (In a Christ no longer
seen only as the Savior of individual souls, but [precisely because He is the Redeemer in the fullest sense] as the ultimate Mover of anthropogenesis.)
In any case, the believer
sees only two
possibilities: the word will either disappear completely, leaving no trace, or it will remain as a question for all men.
If the disciples and Peter follow the risen Jesus to Galilee where he is initiating a second career, they will not
only «
see the Lord» as he continues his ministry among the marginalized masses, they will also participate in his resurrection, even as they participated in his death; and consequently, like him at the beginning of his career in the narrative world of Mark's Gospel, they will be called into being as God's beloved daughters and sons and simultaneously be empowered to actualize the
possibilities of the reign of Christ.
It has not
seen the truth in the Spanish folk proverb, that «to make love is to declare one's sorrows»; nor has it noticed that the deepest expressions of love are not
only painful to the one who loves but can also make inexorable demands on the one who is loved — demands which are not arbitrary and certainly not coercive in their manner of expression, but which are inexorable none the less, since they expect of the beloved the full and complete realization of all his
possibilities as a lover.
As we have
seen, process thought not
only affirms pluralism, which is reflected in our schools, universities, and colleges no less than in our society, but advocates such an attitude of openness towards individuals, groups, cultures, and ideas different from ourselves and our own groups, cultures, ideas that the
possibility of increased contrast, richness of experience, of mutual transformation, without loss of integrity, is enhanced.
One of these was A.H. Johnson who was the first to mention the
possibility of a «societal view,» and thereby elicited an explicitly negative reaction from Whitehead.8 Others who entertain this view are, mainly, William Christian, Lewis Ford, Marjorie Suchocki, and Jorge Nobo.9 Amongst these, Ford is the
only one who links his holding of the «entitative view» to an emphasis on the imprehensibility of God's consequent nature10 (and who later finds this so much of a problem that he starts searching in other directions, though not in that of the «societal view»).11 The other three — Christian, Suchocki, and Nobo — do
see possibilities for a conceptually coherent account of the prehensibility of God.
Then, at a time when I seemed to be rather rapidly losing ground, I heard some things that gave me interest enough in mental healing to make me try it; I had no great hope of getting any good from it — it was a chance I tried, partly because my thought was interested by the new
possibility it seemed to open, partly because it was the
only chance I then could
see.
The actualities of existence are
seen as
only partial fulfillment's of latent
possibilities.
There he defined a Modernist as «a churchman who believes in the
possibility of a synthesis between the essential truth of his religion and the essential truth of modernity».7 Like Loisy, he was critical of the Protestant Liberals, making the much - quoted remark that the Christ that Harnack
saw, looking back through nineteen centuries of Catholic darkness, was
only the reflection of a Liberal Protestant face
seen at the bottom of a deep well.
Either way, as
seen in the tweet below and the reaction from supporters, it's
only served to add further excitement to the
possibility that Arsenal could be signing him this month.
The
only possibility I could
see for a LeBron 2 arriving to help the Cavs would be a secret identical twin raised by a different family.
Against these teams we need someone who can
see a pass or a
possibility that no one else can and ozil is the
only one in our team who does that.
With Lacazette ruling himself out, the
only possibilities seem like Icardi and Hernandez but I don't
see Wenger doing anything after Mustafi
These are the
only possibilities as I
see it: Mahrez * Draxler * Lacazette * Turan Kokorin Rodriguez Barbosa Bacca
Title was never a serious question in summer 2016 —
only after we
saw what was possible against the uninitiated did we consider the title to be within the realm of
possibility.
The
only potential downside I can
see is the
possibility that Sinc plays out her career in Vancouver.
which is certainly not a slight on the young french national player; like him or not, Sanchez has provided some real world - class performances for club and country in recent years... if you do this move, you need to really clean house or face some serious consequences for the foreseeable future... half measures are rarely rewarded, that's how we got here... tear down the wall... we need to get rid of Giroud, not because he isn't a talented player, his skill - set simply doesn't make sense if we hope to maximize the offensive potential of a quick passing, one - touch scheme... we need to evolve, like Barcelona, who realized you needed to have clinical finishers or face a mind - numbing future of horizontal passes and largely ineffective crosses... Barca went and got Suarez, even though they had Messi and Neymar on the roster (just imagine the
possibilities — another in the litany of Wenger «what ifs»)... we need to be as clinical in the boardroom as on the pitch... accept nothing less or move on... personally I would move on from Welbeck, Giroud and Walcott, even Ox if he isn't all in... I think the most intriguing player might be Perez, which runs counter to the thoughts in my head when he arrived late last summer... we need a deep lying DM with quick feet and long ball potential, midfielders who can counter quickly even when they are spread out and 4 or 5 players who know how to attack the lanes (kind of a cross between Barca, Dortmund and Monaco)... this is seriously an achievable goal, one that logically should have been achieved quite a few years ago... did no one in the Arsenal organization
see the financial restructuring of the football universe... think of the players we could have had but we weren't willing to cough up the dough
only for those individuals to have their value double or triple within a 12 to 24 month period... even if just from an investment perspective these «no deals» represent a failure of monumental proportions...
only if you cared, of course
Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will
see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have
only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the
only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are
only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to
see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the
possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could
only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've
only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that
only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...
I don't
see Alexis will miss the opportunity to move to city because there
only he has some chances of getting premiere league medal or may Champions League... With Arsenal he don't even slight
possibility of winning anything except 2 tier cup competition which are not enough to stopping Sanchez moving to City... It's not about money..
«
Only then will we
see how to proceed, but at the moment the
possibility of Morata staying are slim.
I decided (especially since he wasn't my
only kid, and staying in the house for weeks on end wasn't a
possibility) after enough days had passed and I just wasn't
seeing ANY measure of real success other than occasional timing - based luck, to admit defeat and put him back in diapers.
Johnson did not rule out the
possibility of MPs going to jail as a result of the expenses scandal, saying
only: «The police are investigating at least three of our colleagues and we will have to
see how it goes.»
A new study supported by the Milstein Medical Research Program at The Rockefeller University, however, has uncovered the molecular roots of skin discoloration that is often associated with psoriasis, suggesting the
possibility of new treatments for pigmentation changes
seen not
only in psoriasis, but also in other conditions such as eczema and acne.
Another
possibility is that they have
seen only a fraction of all the satellites associated with the Milky Way due to various observational biases.
The Chinese have
only flown three piloted missions since 2003 «and there are really no aggressive plans that I have
seen, although there has been some reporting in the media about the
possibility of a piloted Chinese moon mission.
Krauss:... who developed something, an idea, which is called inflation, which is really currently the best - founded picture of what may have happened and the
only picture that, sort of, provides a
possibility of explaining what we
see from first principles.
«Therefore, it's possible that we
only see one bright clump magnified due to the lensing, and this is one
possibility as to why it is smaller than typical field galaxies of that time.»
But
only when you
see that the assumptions you've been working under are not valid, when you despair of getting there through your rational mind, does the
possibility of truly changing your mind arise.
Consider for one minute the
possibility that excess carbohydrates, not excess fat (which the USDA
only recommends 65 grams of a day) cause problems like obesity, diabetes and heart disease, and even if Americans are
only following half of the advice set forth by the USDA, and its easy to
see why these diseases are rampant.
These are two possible paths but not the
only possibilities, and I don't even
see them as opposite ends of some kind of spectrum.