The only section of the bill that applies to «public» businesses says that the state won't force the business open on Saturday or Sunday, and that the business should make accommodations for anyone working on the weekend to be able to attend religious services (my paraphrasing).
Not exact matches
In normal times,
Section 18
of the Act says the Bank can
only buy (or sell) certain types
of assets — coins, foreign currencies, federal and provincial / territorial debt, debt issued by the U.S., Japan or the European Union, International Monetary Fund (IMF) special drawing rights, and
bills of exchange or promissory notes issued by a bank or authorized foreign bank provided they have a maturity
of no more than 180 days.
Section 92A (2)
only provides cover for a provincial law directed at «the export from the province to another part
of Canada» whereas s 2
of the
Bill is directed more generally at exports from the province — whether to another part
of Canada or directly to the United States.
But, while most
of those pages say: «add the following text here», other pages say things like «delete Internal Revenue Code
Section 199», so not all
of the 182 pages
of the
bill amending the Internal Revenue Code adds text, some
of the
bill deletes text or adds
only a word or two here or there in redline fashion to a larger paragraph that is restated in redline form in which identifying where to put the amended language takes much more space than the new language itself.
The
bill proposed the substitution
of subsection 308 (2) which reads «the provisions
of subsection (1)
of this
section shall not apply to civil proceedings against a person to whom this
section applies in his official capacity or to civil or criminal proceedings in which such a person is
only a nominal party», with a new
section.
If you're
only after credit card customers and repeat
billing then you are
only swimming in a small
section of the pool.
Nevada's lower courts in Lopez v. Schwartz and Duncan v. State reaffirmed the ruling
of the Nevada Supreme Court that the state's Education Savings Account legislation is constitutional;
only one
section of the
bill providing funding for the program was struck down for lack
of an appropriation.
The
bill, which now moves to the full House, strikes
Section 4.5
of the Illinois Education Labor Relations Act, which bans the CTU's ability to bargain — and potentially strike — over non-monetary issues, a right denied to
only to teachers in Chicago.
In considering whether s. 626.1 had the effect
of negating this exception, the Court looked to Hansard, wherein the sponsor
of the
bill enacting the
section remarked that the purpose
of the
bill was to clearly establish that when an insured has coverage through a disability program, the insurer is
only responsible for topping up income replacement, above what is already being received through the disability program.
Shall
Section 11
of Article I (
Bill of Rights)
of the Constitution
of Virginia be amended (i) to require that eminent domain
only be exercised where the property taken or damaged is for public use and, except for utilities or the elimination
of a public nuisance, not where the primary use is for private gain, private benefit, private enterprise, increasing jobs, increasing tax revenue, or economic development; (ii) to define what is included in just compensation for such taking or damaging
of property; and (iii) to prohibit the taking or damaging
of more private property than is necessary for the public use?
The phrase «principles
of fundamental justice» had been borrowed directly from
section 2 (e)
of the Canadian
Bill of Rights, Canada's proto - Charter enacted in 1960, and had been interpreted by the Supreme Court to mean that everyone was entitled to a fair hearing before an impartial tribunal.29 Put another way, fundamental justice incorporated a procedural guarantee synonymous with «natural justice,» meaning that the state may certainly deprive an individual
of life, liberty or security
of the person, but
only if procedural safeguards have first been met.
«While
Section 6
of the
bill states that people offering or receiving public services must have their face uncovered, it also stipulates this is
only for reasons
of «security, communications, or identification.
The initial impact
of Section 24 will
only be truly felt upon receipt
of the 2018/19 tax
bill (due at the end
of January 2019);
The proposed
section 241.2 (1)(c)
of Bill C - 14 establishes the eligibility for medical assistance in dying
only to those who have a «grievous and irremediable medical condition.»
Not
only that, but the US Senate is expected to progress a
bill that would chip away at the internet industry's legal shield, a law known as
Section 230
of the Communications Decency Act, with new legislation to tackle online sex traffic.
Not
only would both
bills eviscerate the immunity from liability for user - generated content that Internet intermediaries have under
Section 230, the
bills would also amend the federal criminal sex trafficking statute to sweep in companies who may not even be aware
of what their users are doing.
Section 57
of the
Bill requires
only that the director or independent reviewer «must have regard to must have regard to must have regard to must have regard to must have regard to the principle that indigenous persons are the primary source
of information about the significance.»
RESTORES (the Senate
bill only delayed) the grandfathering
of lower rates when new flood maps are issued by repealing
Section 207
of the law before any increases can be implemented.
The
only ongoing requirement is to verify the accuracy
of utility rates used in the estimated
bill section of the software, which performs «what if» analyses and evaluates price schemes from multiple - energy providers.