Sentences with phrase «only see comments»

so far I have only see comments from people that haven't got through the program and people that got scared from a sales pitch, so is hard to take a good opinion about RD coaching, hopefully someone has gone through it to post some more info about all this.

While we do not have access to the specific details of any insured traveler's policy — we only see the comments — it's clear that many travelers unfairly label travel insurance a fraud simply because the policy didn't pay out when the insured thought it should.

I only see comments about how great it looks.

Hi Pat, For some reason I'm only seeing your comment now, sorry about this!

I really need to subscribe to Saveur and I only saw this comment, so I guess you are in the clear, lol.

The worst thing is we only saw this comment days later, making us look even more suspicious!

My colleague should have only seen any comments in the document that had not yet been deleted.

Not exact matches

One of the features of bitcoin people find enticing — by no means the only one to be sure — is the fact that its supply is strictly limited (well, sort of — see our comment on «forks» further below).

It doesn't help that 10 - year bond yields are still lower than the prospective operating earnings yield on the S&P 500 (the «Fed Model»), not only because the model is built on an omitted variables bias (see the August 22 2005 comment), but also because the model statistically underperforms a simpler rule that says «get in when stock yields are high and interest rates are falling, and get out when the reverse is true.»

To those who look at the world and say «see how old it is, therefore God does not exist because the bible states that it is only 6 - 10 thousand years old» you may never get this comment.

Then, I can only see the three comments of Terry Mingus, Klhayes and DonaldByronJohnson.

David: on this What Piper Sees cartoon, I see 15 comments on top, but only 3 comments 5 reactions down here.

I never saw your comment «starting «That is a fair questions...» on my I phone — Instead, I only saw, «You need to not try to speak for me.»

Only rarely do I recognize them from the comment section on this blog, or from seeing them share my posts on Facebook or Twitter.

Seeing that Julie has made it clear in multiple comments here that she is entirely willing to open the books for anyone who cares to challenge her version of events, we're left with only one conclusion.

I'm on an android phone and opened this link in chrome, the only thing I can see is the bold black title, the menu buttons and a large blank white space before the comments section.

I think I can only respond to your succinct comments as: I can not always see what my fellow human being sees, but I can accept their belief, or none, and respond with love and respect to their human right to see and hear what they see and hear.

You, Wilbur, clearly, when you made this snide and threatening comment: When your in hell and you feel pain and see flames, remember it is only imaginary.

I admit I did post it earlier but only because I wanted to see some responses to the comment but I have know idea where it was in this sea of posts.

I have to agree with the atheist here I didn't see anything in the article says atheist were the only ones doing this yet you felt the need to attack atheist is your comment.

Really... you make a race comment... Really... Only those not seeing content of character see color of skin by friend... Really...

One final comment: The assumption of protopsychic matter is no more revolutionary than our epistemological knowledge that all objects which we see have no color, because color only arises in sense cells and brain.

Mark, I only come here to comment and to see what nonsense is being bruited about by the media.

Seeing Jesus as the «lion of the tribe of Judah,» Cyprian quotes Genesis 49: 11, «He shall wash his raiment in wine and his robe in the blood of the grape,» and comments that whenever reference is made to the blood of the grape, then «this can signify only that in the Lord's cup the blood is wine.»

I shall not comment on this latter day version of the «soul,» except to say that it is hard to see how anything which exists only for a very short interval and then perishes would be able to carry out such complicated presidential functions.

The «home» page shows 121 comments for this blog entry yet I can only see 16.

Its a relief for me to read these comments and see that I am far from the only one tired of the American church.

after hardship comes ease My brother all this is the work of the JEWSH -LRB--LRB-(Sedition)-RRB--RRB- 99.99 % OF THE COMMENTS YOU SEE ARE WRITEN BY THEM THEY ONLY WANT»S -LRB--LRB--LRB--LRB-(Sedition)-RRB--RRB--RRB-.

I'm going to only comment on the story, seeing people band together under (any) a banner of hope, regardless if it is religious in nature.

Tried these the other day — really disappointed as they turned out bad and that I had wasted so many expensive ingredients I used everything listed, wish I had've read the comments section more though to see you saying to ONLY use orange sweet potato, as I used white fleshed, and an actual measurement, as I must've used too much.

first time I get to see only 3 comments on ur post!

It was only after I read the comments did I see the serving size in the comments.

These look delicious and I saw your comment re: molasses only adding 1 gram of carbohydrate to each serving, but am wondering if it will make a g difference to leave it put altogether?

For some reason, I don't get notifications on my earlier posts and I only see them if I go look in my «comments» inbox!

Sorry I have only just seen this comment which must have got lost in my in - box.

The only rants, lectures, and nastiness I'm seeing is in the comments like yours railing against those few mild vegan posts.

My Osterizer was NOT up to the task, and only after everything got jammed up did I see the comments about pre-grinding the oats.

I have seen your comments and am only getting around to visiting you know.I will be touring around your posts.

yeah this needs to be retested and adjusted, i wish i had seen the comments first because i made it, added only 1 cup of milk and it is bland and not a casserole in any sense of the word.

I saw your comment on your post about doing the same thing and thought, «Hey, at least I'm not the only one.»

Jude - so sorry your comment got posted so late, I missed it at the time and only saw it today!

i knew it when i saw all the comments... even from here and articles... people were only thinking Chelsea... now... well..

Although many will suggest that Robson has a personal vendetta of sorts aimed squarely at the Grinch who stole soccer, that doesn't make his words any less truthful... such tactics are nothing new... in the U.S.this business practice has become so common that even the players regularly use the media to manipulate public opinion (LeBron James did likewise to rally public support for himself and away from his teammate, Kyrie Irving, who has asked to be traded)... whether for contract leverage or to rally support for or against certain players, this strategy can be incredibly effective at times, but when it misses the mark it can be dangerously divisive... for a close - to - the - vest team like Arsenal to use such nefarious means to manufacture a wedge between the fans and it's best player (again), is absolutely despicable... for the sanctimonious higher - ups who demand that it's players adhere to a certain protocol regarding information deemed «in house» or else to intentionally spread «fake» news or to provide certain outlets with privileged information for such purposes is pretty low indeed... no moral high ground here, just a big club pretending to be a small club so that they can continue to pull the wool over the eyes of a dedicated, albeit somewhat naive, fan base... so not only does this club no give a shit about it's fans, this clearly shows that clubs primary interests aren't even soccer related... for all intent and purposes Kroenke doesn't care if we're a soccer club or a tampon factory as long as we continue to maximized his investment... stay woke people... great to see more and more people commenting on the state of the franchise... this club needs to be held accountable for it's actions

(2) somewhat linked to the previous comment in that we never seem to be prepared to hit the ground running with our best potential lineup come opening day... it's become so common, in recent years, that many fans actually hope we stumble a little in the first couple games just so it forces Wenger to bring in reinforcements... unfortunately this can be problematic, thus one of the most common phrases associated with Wenger, «panic buy»... this situation is also negatively impacted by the ridiculous policy regarding players who played in the summer months... right now I'm watching the Super Cup and not a single player is unavailable to either manager, including Ronaldo, yet somehow we have a list of players half a mile long that haven't seen game - time so far this preseason... I can only assume this is a reactionary policy created due to the multitude of injuries this club has faced over the years... just another sign of the fragility that permeates this club

I thought I was the only one seeing that, you find comments.

You only need read a typical sample of any club» s fan comments to see how fans expect loyalty and call players «traitors» who exercise their human rights to change clubs (subject to existing contracts of course).

You only have to look at some comments posted on here to see the truth of that.

(By week's end Mann, who couldn't be reached for comment, was allowing only her Facebook friends to see her postings.)

At one point, Gary made a comment that I will paraphrase: «For all the fans in Alabama — and there are only about five of them that like us — and two of them are relatives...» See, they DO read your comments.

But: nw, hav, cud, Hw, nt, sum, thre, bhnd, 4me hs, beta, thn, wu, shud, b, nd, wit, tht, luks, wit makes your comment so difficult to read I just prefer to give you a thumbs down instead of having to go through it slowly to see what you mean (which I did this, and only this, time!).