Sentences with phrase «only see sense»

Well, the best I see here is that you can only see sense in any decision taking by Yoruba / SW Leaders.

Not exact matches

He says that if you can get only a 2 % return on bonds — rates we're seeing today — and 5.5 % yields on blue - chip stocks like BCE, it makes sense to overweight stocks, no matter what your age.

And for any HR policy, not only ones relating to office romance, Huhman suggests holding an annual company - wide event to revisit rules to see if they still make sense and so that every employee feels that they have a voice.

People who reject their intuition for a strictly linear mindset are basing decisions on only what they see and acknowledge through the other five senses.

«Basically, the only way this works if all these stages and pieces are working in conjunction so in a sense we are the general contractors of this new way to advertise as we see the process through end - to - end and have built tools so that we can accomplish all of this,» he explained.

Sprinkle some of these terms in where it makes sense to and you can see yourself not only ranking for new terms BUT also improving your current ranking for your related keyword because Google sees your article as more relevant.

If you are paying 8 % on your student loans and are worried that you will only see 7 % annualized returns on your investments, paying down your student loans as fast as possible makes sense.

So it only makes sense to continue tracking that data over long periods of time to see if new trends emerge that would warrant you adding a new persona to your marketing.

Personally, I like to keep everything in one spot so I see how both company - centric and customer - centric ideas fit together, but depending on how your company is organized, it could make sense to break these out if certain groups only care about certain things.

It only makes sense when they are corralled in a manner which allows you to truly see.

«When we are facing the sort of infrastructure destruction we have seen this hurricane season, it only makes sense to give some pause before reinvesting in the exact same system that proved too vulnerable,» Gwen Holdmann, who directs the Alaska Center for Energy and Power at the University of Alaska in Fairbanks, said in an email.

Only an Economist should be able to speak to this topic in a truly Professional sense — assuming that they are not encumbered by their masters who want to see the big wheels keep rolling, regardless.

Those who look at women in the pulpit and do not see a sister lit up with the Spirit of God, but can only see their own projection... well... they're thinking pornographically, in the most fundamental sense of the word.

While I can see the point of your rejection of both textual criticism and proof - texting, I don't see the only alternative to those two extremes being a «common sense» approach.

But underneath it all is a small, almost imperceptable current of life, and a promise of things so wonderful, we can not even comprehend them.I've seen it and sensed it, and tasted it, even if only for sporadic fleeting moments.

You cant debate God... you cant use logic to explain God... You cant use your small finite mind to try and explain away an infinite God... Man is flesh and blood but man has a spirit and some things can only be received and revealed thru spirit... And what you do nt see is actually more real than what you can observe with your five senses... And BTW I did nt say religion i said God... Religion is man made tradition... God is real... develop a personal relationship with the one who created you and gave you life... God has a purpose for your life...

I began with a quotation from the preface of the first edition of Mackay's Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds, and it is worth recalling now a quotation from the preface of the second edition: «Men, it has been well said, think in herds; it will be seen that they go mad in herds, while they only recover their senses slowly, one by one.»

3 On Heidegger's suggestion that the metaphysical concept of ousia has the temporal - horizontal sense of parousia but only «naively and inexplicitly,» see SZ 26 = BT 48; also What Is Called Thinking?

A little later, packing up his manuscripts, Ford happened to see «the page and the very commended phrase «old - eyed», and to notice that somehow in the rounds of fatigued retyping that used to precede a writer's final sign - off on a book in the days before word processors, the original and rather dully hybridised «cold - eyed» had somehow lost its «c» and become «old - eyed», only nobody'd noticed since they both made a kind of sense.»

To read the gospel with an open mind is to see beyond all possibility of doubt that Jesus came to bring us new truths concerning our destiny: not only a new life superior to that we are conscious of, but also in a very real sense a new physical power of acting upon our temporal world.

The modifications in Christian belief above referred to in no sense discredit this revelation; they are modifications only in man's interpretation of it, and in particular, they arise from new ways of looking at the Bible as this is seen in its historical, prescientific setting.

I am so sorry I can not believe,» and then appeals to us for pity because he can not believe, but when the Holy Spirit touches a man's heart, he no longer looks upon unbelief as a mark of intellectual superiority; he does not look upon it as a mere misfortune; he sees it as the most daring, decisive and damning of all sins and is overwhelmed with a sense of his awful guilt in that he had not believed on the name of the only begotten Son of God.

It is possible not only in a theoretical sense and not only for a few, but it presents itself as a real chooseable possibility to many people who could never see the radical response as a live option.

We see at once that the historical in the more concrete sense is a matter of indifference; we may suppose a degree of ignorance with respect to it, and permit this ignorance as if to annihilate one detail after the other, historically annihilating the historical; if only the Moment remains, as point of departure for the Eternal, the Paradox will be there.

It can be seen that only the parables in and 2 may be said to be concerned with proclaiming the Kingdom in the same sense that the eschatological similes proclaim it.

The word «nihilism» has a complex history in modern philosophy, but I use it in a sense largely determined by Nietzsche and Heidegger, both of whom not only diagnosed modernity as nihilism, but saw Christianity as complicit in its genesis; both it seems to me were penetratingly correct in some respects, if disastrously wrong in most, and both raised questions that we Christians ignore at our peril.

In one sense we can say that the authority of Scripture is actual not only where Scripture is acknowledged and read but also where its power is seen.

I mention, only because my... paradigm (I'm not much on beliefs, in the usual organized religion sense)... includes a «Divine» of my own definition, that equates to something like «awe of life, love, and knowing that there is much we don't know» (< — sorry, not the easiest thing for me to get into words, hopefully that gets the gist of it) that I don't see as a «personal other», but, in my paradigm, I see that Divine as being systemic to everything, hence insights from what I learn / experience can be termed as the Divine acting.

Like the ghosts in the film The Sixth Sense, the Washington Republican political class only sees what they want to see.

It is statements like yours that scare me the most because not only does it attribute bad deeds to outside forces, detaching humanity from its own actions, but it gives those who can «detect» the demons a mistaken sense of dominion over all others too «blinded» to see things your way, and countless followers who will not question your actions either.

We are only lately coming to understand this characteristic psychological relationship between the one and the many in Israel; but it is with this understanding that we may see Messianism in the broadest sense in the divine promise to Abraham: «In you all the families of the earth will be blessed» (12:3, R.S.V. margin)

Only via meditation turning the senses inwards / will there be true knowledge of god / / when one looks inwards / / one see's knowing the power of creation.

Others, who also see the situation only as a result of human failure, believe that ministers and schools have been deflected from their purpose and have lost their sense of mission because they have succumbed to the temptation to improve their personal and professional status by doing anything that might make them pleasing to the greatest number of people.

One final comment: The assumption of protopsychic matter is no more revolutionary than our epistemological knowledge that all objects which we see have no color, because color only arises in sense cells and brain.

This sort of despair is seldom seen in the world, such figures generally are met with only in the works of poets, that is to say, of real poets, who always lend their characters this «demoniac» ideality (taking this word in the purely Greek sense).

It is enough to provoke both laughter and tears — not only all these protestations about having understood and comprehended the highest thought, but also the virtuosity with which many know how to present it in abstracto, and in a certain sense quite correctly — it is enough to provoke both laughter and tears when one sees then that all this knowing and understanding exercises no influence upon the lives of these men, that their lives do not in the remotest way express what they have understood, but rather the contrary.

Godly Repentence is a God given thing that only happens when the Spirit of God brings a person to his senses about his sin and he sees it like God sees it.

It is not necessary for us to make a detailed examination of the various sorts of ritual associated with these meals; it will suffice if we see that the Jew worshiped God not only in the synagogue and in the Temple, but also in his home, where families or groups of friends met regularly for a holy supper, often held in connection with great festivals of the Jewish religious year, in which bread and wine, eaten and drunk, were believed to have a peculiar significance in establishing anew a sense of the covenant which God had made with his chosen people.

Edward Hadas has never formally studied economics, and I believe his negative arguments would be stronger if he had, for he would known that within the discipline there are elements of a cult, i.e. that there is a sense among economists that their narrow outlook is the only true way of seeing the world.

You have to find your own reason to believe because if you don't this Christian walk won't ever ever make any sense to you.You say you care only for Christianity because «they impose their laws into secular law» but I think deep down you are lying to yourself.Islam has manifested itself into many many nations with their own law, I don't see you ever demand evidence of Allah heck even what their religion states.You say you demand evidence only when religions impose their laws into secular law but..

Only if those who saw abortion as morally permissible had ever claimed that fetuses were wicked and ought to be punished could the innocence of the fetus, in this second sense of the term, be a moral consideration (OOTM 102).

I see deep inside our body's Structures and see that what we are made of is what this world's Heavenly aboveness is only mimicking in the material sense.

For in the sense in which he uses the term «literal» in the other passages in which he affirms the same categorial terms to have a literal rather than either a symbolic or an analogical meaning, it means nothing other than «univocal» (although, as we shall see presently, this is not the only sense in which he uses the term «literal»).

Even the sacraments of the church have provided occasions of humor, muffled, of course, by a sense of guilt which failed to see that only the true and meaningful can provide the leverage necessary for laughter.

Taken in this second sense, the hermeneutic structure of testimony consists in that testimony concerning things seen only reaches judgment through a story, that is, by means of things said.

We have already seen that the orthodox belief in the divinity of Jesus of Nazareth is (1) only one of the possible ways of explaining his centrality that can be developed from the New Testament; (2) does not fall within the limits of what is logically possible; and (3) is contrary to our common sense.

But let there be revealed to us the possibility of believing at the same time and wholly in God and the World, the one through the other; (In a Christ no longer seen only as the Savior of individual souls, but [precisely because He is the Redeemer in the fullest sense] as the ultimate Mover of anthropogenesis.)

Theologians influenced by positivism, whose adherents saw reality as strictly that which can be experienced through the senses and knowledge as that which can be obtained through a narrow definition of the scientific method, and linguistic analysis, which purported that the only proper function of philosophy is the study of the usage of words and sentences, also treated science and religion as separate realms, distinct «language games,» each with its own set of rules.

And if we have good reason to trust Him, then when we see things that seem to go against our sense of goodness and justice, it seems only fair to give the benefit of the doubt to God, who just might know something more than we know.

He was the Christ, not because he inaugurated the kingdom in the apocalyptic sense or ever will (although it would be rash and presumptuous to affirm absolutely that he never will), but because in him the eternal kingdom of God was in a unique and unprecedented way present and active within history, was not only seen and declared supremely and unmistakably as righteousness and love, but was actually present as judgment and salvation.