Sentences with phrase «only seeing my book»

I can only see the books being balanced with six moving on and three coming in.

Many times readers are only seeing the books that rank the highest in each of the categories they are browsing, the books that «customers also bought» and those «frequently purchased together».

That means that reviewers are not only seeing my book — they're requesting it.

You can separate your audience for your books through a different author name, as you can have separate author pages on Amazon, Kobo and the other book retailers so readers only see the books associated with that name.

Authors get their work in front of the right people and reviewers only see the books they're interested in.

By going to the Kindle Short Reads you will only see the books selling well that are under a certain length.

Not exact matches

I related to the book in ways that I was not expecting and it did what only truly great books do — it made me think about things that I wouldn't have otherwise, and it made me see the world from a slightly different perspective.

On page 5 of my book, you can see some numbers showing how only about 1 % of money in the market is going to new companies via IPOs and other issuances.

PEF people are not the only ones who correctly anticipated some of our recent economic and fiscal events. Jamie Galbraith also saw a lot of this coming in his book The Predator State.

I noted with interest the Guaranteed Income part of the book but with the heavy USA leaning see that for us in the UK only annuities are really available — and as I have dual nationality as a Kiwi we don't even have those back in New Zealand.

I do not forecast numbers years or even months in advance at all and only value and analyze what I see in the company now so you will not see any DCF valuations in this book.

But otherwise it is to wonder if the Prime Minister was a touch disappointment when he opened the budget book last Thursday and found that, not only hadn't the Finance Minister eliminated all taxes, but he'd seen fit to budget for several increases in the cost of civil society.

Topher The only people that read the book of Mormon that don't believe in the planet Kolob are those that have an agenda, see how that works, dummy?

If they're religious they're praying they won't die and the LAST thing on their mind is wasting their last moments on earth discussing something they've never personally seen, only read books about or heard lectures upon.

Since there is only one legal marriage contract on the government books in this family with the rest of the marriages being only spiritual cermonies to bind them each to one another, and there was no duplicity involved on the husband's part, I see no reason why they can not live the lifestyle they have freely chosen as consenting adults.

Of course you can be proven wrong... your holy book was written by man, no god involved; thus your belief is based on the fairy tales told by men who saw a gullible fool a mile away - see, how easy that is??? As for the actual number being only 1.6 billion, sorry the stats say different and your opinion on who the actual number includes is moot.

So you see the only witness is the Book of Quran scriptures which is still up to date a miracle that no one can deny.

That's the question I have to ask myself and not only that, I look at what the actual book says and I can see for myself — they missed it.

If any christians had a decent argument, they'd focus on it, instead of on the imagined «hate» and «spite» they seem to see in everyone who doesn't agree with them — but not in god, who demonstrates it in every book of his «word» if you but only read without the bias of indoctrination / brainwashing.

If there is a God and there is just as much for as against, But lets say there is a God and he made everything Including you and He gets to make the rules because lets face it hes a lot bigger then you, So unfortunately he only wants those who believe in him based on the information given, Lets look at the facts based on the Book,, Some of his own angels turned on him and they see him every day... That had to hurt, So he decides With man he only wants those with the faith to believe based on His book and faith found thru the holy spirit, If you refuse to believe then he cant use you, cant trust you, so he will choose to toss you aside, Hey I understand It ai nt fair, Your important, Your Smart, But unfortunately hes bigger then you and he has the Juice, You either play by the rules or wait and see what not believing leads Book,, Some of his own angels turned on him and they see him every day... That had to hurt, So he decides With man he only wants those with the faith to believe based on His book and faith found thru the holy spirit, If you refuse to believe then he cant use you, cant trust you, so he will choose to toss you aside, Hey I understand It ai nt fair, Your important, Your Smart, But unfortunately hes bigger then you and he has the Juice, You either play by the rules or wait and see what not believing leads book and faith found thru the holy spirit, If you refuse to believe then he cant use you, cant trust you, so he will choose to toss you aside, Hey I understand It ai nt fair, Your important, Your Smart, But unfortunately hes bigger then you and he has the Juice, You either play by the rules or wait and see what not believing leads too.

A little later, packing up his manuscripts, Ford happened to see «the page and the very commended phrase «old - eyed», and to notice that somehow in the rounds of fatigued retyping that used to precede a writer's final sign - off on a book in the days before word processors, the original and rather dully hybridised «cold - eyed» had somehow lost its «c» and become «old - eyed», only nobody'd noticed since they both made a kind of sense.»

One need only consider the perspectives on violence in Tertullian's Apologia and De Corona Militis, Origen's Contra Celsum, the Acts of the Scillitan Martyrs, the Martyrdom of St. Marinus, St. Paulinus of Nola's Letter 25, and Book XIX of the City of God, to see that significant Christians of the first millennium either rejected violence outright or were profoundly uneasy with it.

We have already seen how everywhere in the Bible, 99 times in the book of John alone, the single and only condition for receiving eternal life is believing in Jesus Christ for it.

There are a few churches doing this around the country, but I only read about them in books, and on blogs, and have never actually visited one or seen how it works.

Seeing that Julie has made it clear in multiple comments here that she is entirely willing to open the books for anyone who cares to challenge her version of events, we're left with only one conclusion.

He not only provides detailed explanations of the text all the way through (which providing lots of footnotes for those who want to research in more depth), but he also provides theological asides that help the student of Scripture see how the book influences our life and thinking today.

First, Driscoll's so - called «fall» (from the Acts 29 p.o.v.) seems mainly to involve scandalous improprieties re: funds and books and tone and so on, but the theology that undergirds the spiritual abuse doesn't come under fire since Acts 29 not only doesn't see it as a problem, but generally holds to it as well.

As far as examples of strong women in media, I can only cite the ones that I've appreciated — Buffy and Willow from Buffy The Vampire Slayer, Zoe, Inara, and Kaylee from Firefly, and Joan and Peggy from Mad Men (I love Peggy so much), Katniss Everdeen from The Hunger Games (the books, as I haven't seen the movie).

Not only did I thoroughly enjoy the book, but I also appreciate the various blogs managed by Helen (see chapter 5 in the book) over at Off The Map.

Pope Benedict's eagerly awaited volume should be seen not only as the second part of his exegetical - theological study of the figure of Jesus in the Gospels, but also as the necessary complement to his book The Spirit of the Liturgy.

Firstly, it must be remembered, that he disclaims very early in the book that he can only speak for the mainline denominations with which he is familiar, and although my memory may fail me, he implies that he can only speak for his observations of the churches / leaders with whom he is familiar, and also that he may be wrong, and also, that he is only pointing out what he calls a possible cause for the problems he has seen, and hopes that his suggestions / ideas, will be considered, researched, etc, and that time will tell if his thesis bears any truth or not.

I give the scriptures as I see them written in the book of remembrance, and the paraphrases, it is right there before us in black, and white, so what do you want from me, I'm only quoting from the book here.

the «eyewitnesses» to Joe did not see the delivery of the plates... they only saw the plates AFTER deliverance... while the traveling compamions of Paul were right there with Him on the Road to Damascus... go read the Book of Acts

Some readers will call the book highly biased; the author sees only one side of the Vietnam conflict — its brutality and moral bankruptcy.

Americans are slow to adapt and are defly afraid of change, see how the african american community is stiill only allowed to vote under the voting rights act of 1965 (that's right, it still not a law) Why are they not up in arms,,,,, «yet we have a black president... maybe you can take a page from their book (passive aggression).

It was only obvious to me because I have read most of the books by Author B and was shocked to see so many of his ideas and insights being written about as if they belonged to Author A.

But while Lindsell obviously intends to meet these concerns, his book is actually a repristination (and often less subtle than earlier expressions) of a particular timebound formulation of biblical authority that is being seen by increasing numbers of evangelicals not only to have outlived its usefulness but to have become a positive hindrance to the understanding of the fuller and deeper significance of the Scriptures.

Near the beginning of the twenty - fourth and last Book of Homer's Iliad, called by Simone Weil «the only true epic» the West possesses, even the gods — detached as they are in their bliss from all sufferings — have seen enough.

Some how it's felt that values, morals, virtues are not there in a secular world only faceless solid lifeless laws of men rather than what has been relayed by Holy books that calls for good deeds and reject bad deeds and to build a faithful societies, communities, nations since communications among nations or even among the nations of mixed cultures and beliefs... Laws or God and universe are to be prepared by some thing that is equivalent to UN but built on nations beliefs to achieve the code of understanding among nations but as can see now it is build on groundless bases if not of words of God to faiths... in addition to those non spiritual secular beliefs to make decisions of faith but at the moment the secular world make and take the decisions while the beliefs and faiths has to pay for it when it becomes a war between all faiths or religions outside your world, it would become back into your inside among the mixed culture and beliefs of the nation or nations under one country flag...!

My name is Elder Jamie and I would like to tell you about the most amazing musical... As Premier Christianity's resident swear - a-tron, it was only a matter of time before I went to see The Book of... More

In his book, So - Called Christian, Jim Turner confesses to his own sins of pride, jealousy, and discord, and explain how he came to see that such behavior is not only damaging to himself and his relationships, but also to the church at large and the church's witness to the world.

Beginning with a Nietzschean analysis of Greek thinking and literature which sees the distancing of the numinous as the center of the Greek experience, this book attempts to demonstrate that the higher expressions of religion in both East and West revolve about an absolute antithesis between religion and reality, wherein religion can only truly and finally realize itself by an absolute negation, dissolution or annihilation of reality itself.

As Premier Christianity's resident swear - a-tron, it was only a matter of time before I went to see The Book of Mormon.

I hope that Bottum dismissed Baum because he had only seen the movie and assumed the books to be equally vapid.

The Gospel of John is often seen as «the only evangelistic book of the Bible.»

What really impressed me about the Bible, when I compared it with the other holy books, is that it's the only one that commanded objective testing: «test everything; hold fast what is good» Paul says in 1 Thessalonians 5:21 (ESV), and actually you see how the Bible not only tells you to test, it shows you how to do it.

One need only look at President Jimmy Carter, who went so far as to teach Sunday school at his local Baptist church, to see how a sitting president can make room for faith, said Balmer of Dartmouth, who counts among his many books «God in the White House: How Faith Shaped the Presidency from John F. Kennedy to George W. Bush.»

Whenever I begin a book of which I have only seen the movie (or the Wishbone episode), I start out with a burst of ego.

But one has only to read the book of a leading liberal, Dr. Harry Emerson Fosdick's Christianity and Progress, written in 1922, to see that the deeper insight of Christian faith was not surrendered.

I see I must choose my words more carefully if they shall be dissected to the ultimate extreme:) The only Biblical translations that I am aware of that add the additional books to their Bibles, are the Catholics.