It is
only simple justice to mention his name; it was Bishop Francis J. McConnell.
Not exact matches
Like many westerns, «Django Unchained» latches onto a
simple, stark picture of good and evil, and takes homicidal vengeance as the highest — if not the
only — form of
justice.
Grenville blithely leaves behind his idealism in favor of a more conventional idea of success,
only to have his conscience pricked by Dalrymple's unconventional daughter, Charlotte, an activist for social
justice, even as he's entering into a comfortable if passionless engagement with Dalrymple's other daughter, the passive, and much
simpler, Emily.
The movie perhaps best serves as a primer for those unfamiliar with the original film, which is a richer, far more complex work (The ending, in particular, not
only contradicts a character's firm stance on
justice but also resolves things in the
simplest of ways).
Aside from a single scene set in a courtroom, in which the
justices appear
only as blurred, distant shapes, there's almost no debating, let alone grandstanding, in this
simple but moving love story.
As Richard Kluger, author of
Simple Justice, pointed out, «The Supreme Court had taken pains to limit the language of Brown to segregation in public schools
only....
An information request by «decision» (as opposed to a «
simple request») can be addressed
only to «large» companies (i.e., with above 250 employees, as per the EU definition available here) and trade associations, may entail fines in the form of period penalty payments, and can be challenged before the Court of
Justice of the EU.
Today, Scott Greenfield added to this discussion on his
Simple Justice blog, pointing out that big follower numbers continue to impress many Twitter users who lack «a clear understanding that followers on Twitter are too often named «Britney» or [are] themselves
only interested in gathering as many followers as possible in their simplistic quest at marketing hegemony.»
For Scott Greenfield at
Simple Justice the First Amendment «journalistic principles» aren't as clear - cut, particularly where a guy's reputation is ruined and the newspaper itself presented
only part of the story by failing to note that all charges against Feyissa were dismissed.
And for proof that a
simple, direct writing style isn't a newfangled idea, we need
only consult some well - known 19th - and early - 20th - Century writers and Supreme Court
justices.
Notwithstanding our philosophical objections to professor Brand's thesis, we can
only agree with his general statement that «access to courts is not access to
justice», and that «[a] n ODR system that is
simple, efficient, effective, transparent, and fair, offers the hope of real
justice in such disputes».