Sentences with phrase «only speak the language»

As for teaching English, the best way to learn a language is for the teacher to only speak the language you are learning.

What would it mean to proclaim the ways of Jesus to a government that only speaks the language of military spending and protecting its own interests?

Only speaking the language that you are learning around the home will definitely help everything to sink in.

Being fluent in language means that you can not only speak the language, but also understand the points of view and get the humor of this or that nation.

That means customers of diverse ethnicities can find an associate who not only speaks their language but also speaks the intricate language of real estate fluently.

In San Francisco, where we have a sizeable Chinese population, we needed agents who not only speak the language, but understand the needs of foreign nationals as well as the needs of other potential foreign clients who wish to buy property in this country.

Not exact matches

Although Belize is the only English - speaking nation in Central America, the locals» native language is Kriol — and they appreciate foreigners» attempts to learn.

Some languages like Dani, spoken in Papua New Guinea, and Bassa, spoken in Liberia and Sierra Leone, only have two terms, dark and light.

Not only does this awareness allow founders to speak the language of — and better bond with — their tech teams, it also avoids costly confusion since they're able to clearly and concisely communicate what needs to be done.

After mounting «Potted Potter,» an unauthorized Harry Potter spoof in Toronto, Starvox not only toured the show in English - speaking markets, but is now producing a Spanish - language version for Mexican audiences.

Speaking the right language will not only show that you're interested in more than your current role, but it will also demonstrate your intelligence and fit within the company.

EASTWOOD: As you probably noticed that was slightly operatic and the people were... I had other actors, were all different languages so everybody spoke their own language as we only had a $ 200,000 budget and so they didn't... Everybody... They didn't have time to do a lot of training or anything.

Researchers found that young adults proficient in two languages performed better on attention tests and had better concentration than those who spoke only one language, irrespective of whether they had learned that second language during infancy, childhood or their teen years.

Speaking the language of your target audience and embracing the subculture that is shaping their online lives is the only sure - fire way to create content that will appeal to them.

Even though the bots are voice - equipped and «speak» several languages, only about a quarter of people try talking to them.

When it comes to Silicon Valley, people speak only one language «Technology».

Unless it was meant for us as a new system to drop Republican systems for the Royalist systems that are taking place now that Jordan and Morocco both Royelists are planed to join GCC as one with a change to the name of the GCC since the Royalist empire will be extending to countries outer of the Arabian Gulf Countries... What ever it is all we need is freedom of rights, justice, peace, equality and to live in prosperity... Egypt is not in the heart of Egyptions only but as well in the heart of every Arabic nation, Egyptions were our teachers in our schools and Egypt was the university of our Yemeni students... Egypt was the source of islamic educations, Egypt was the face of all arts, books, papers, TV plays and movies to all of Arabian speaking countries... Egypt is our Arabian Icon so please please other nations are becoming larger and stronger in the area on your account as a living icon for the Arabian Unity what ever our faiths or beliefs are we are brothers in blood, culture and language, God Bless to All.Amen.

For all our differences, it was good to be at a gathering where not only the Bible but also history, denominational distinctives, and the Creed were valued; where the liturgy reflected the seriousness of the gospel message; where the delegates thought confessionally; and where we spoke the same theological and ecclesiastical language.

In fact, in the past 9 years there have only been 3 topics people discussed, regardless of their race, religion (even atheists), culture, gender, or primary language: they only spoke of (1) God, (2) family, and (3) relationships with other people & regrets / joy for those relationships.

«13 If I could speak all the languages of earth and of angels, but didn't love others, I would only be a noisy gong or a clanging cymbal.

I was trying to acknowledge someone's complaint about the strong language while at the same time explaining that it is only another way to speak that might require a small effort to translate.

Wycliffe Bible Translators has only just begun distributing these devices to translators and linguists working to translate the Bible into every spoken language.

Scars speak a private language that only the wounded know and Christ wears His scars because He is abundantly fluent in broken hearts.

For the over-all result of the great reaction has been a sophistication of the true simplicity of the gospel, the use of a jargon which the common man (and the intelligent one, too, often enough) can not understand, and a tendency to assume that the biblical and creedal language as it stands need only be spoken, and enough then has been done to state and communicate the point of the Christian proclamation.

Perhaps Paul Tillich will prove to be the last theologian who could speak in this manner, and he did so only by employing the language of Hegel, Nietzsche, and Freud.

And just as that kingly grief of which we have spoken can be found only in a kingly soul, and is not even named in the language of the multitude of men, so the entire human language is so selfish that it refuses even to suspect the existence of such a grief.

Or perhaps we should say that «language» needs to be understood broadly as any medium of communication, not only speaking or writing.

Whether there ever was a time when humans were so few in number that they constituted only one society and spoke only one language we can not say.

Today we still speak of the cross only in the explicit language of the Church and religion; perhaps some pious old Christians may still use the expression for the experience of their own life.

Because of God's transcendence it would be mythological to refer to God's action in terms appropriate only to objects available, in principle at least, to ordinary sense perception.13 This especially means that one can not speak of God in terms of the categories of time and space; 14 i.e., whatever is predicated of God can not apply only to some particular time and space, but must apply equally to all times and spaces.15 Thus the implication of Ogden's criterion for non-mythological language about God corresponds to his statement of several years ago, that «there is not the slightest evidence that God has acted in Christ in any way different from the way in which he primordially acts in every other event.

If by language you mean languages other than English, then you are correct, I only speak one.

Accusing our culture of using Christianity's language without its substance, she does the same, speaking of judgment and forgiveness only in terms of societal judgment and forgiveness, which, indeed have passed away in this guilt - erasing culture.

It would be foolish to predict so far into the future, but it seems unlikely that any will equal the King James Version not only in terms of longevity, but in its capacity to shape the language and culture of the English - speaking peoples.

«Trinity» did not originally mean, as it does for some later, that there are three kinds of revelation, the Father speaking through creation and the Spirit though experience, by which the words and example of the Son must be corrected; it meant rather that language must be found and definitions created so that Christians, who believe in only one God, can affirm that he is most adequately and bindingly known in Jesus.

Second: to say that this particular book is true is to say that we can trust it, trust it as a guide to faith and life which provides not only specific claims about God's faithfulness and how we ought to live our lives in response to it, but also a way of understanding the whole world and a language in which to speak about that world.

Such a miracle would involve the suspension of the laws of nature at the level of primitive actual occasions, but if we accept the principle that God «speaks» to a given actual occasion in its own «language,» and if the «language» of primitive actual occasions in nature is such that the character of the data available for aesthetic synthesis in the concrescence of such occasions admits only of absolutely miniscule contrasts with the givenness of the character of the past, then God has no leverage via subjective aims to introduce shifts in the social structures conditioning the possibilities available for aesthetic synthesis in the concrescences of such primitive actual occasions.

The Christian proceeds, but he can do so only by faith, and he can speak about the eternal nature of hope only in the language of faith.

When W. E. B. Du Bois spoke in 1903 about embracing the «greater ideals of the American Republic» and the «spirit of the Declaration of Independence «11 he was only doing in the language of his day what Gordon and Cruse in our own time do when they espouse democracy and pluralism as fundamental to the American republic.

He speaks to the people only in the language of history and in such a way that they can explain what happened as the coincidence of adverse circumstances.

The project has two subjects, Koko and Michael, who have learned to use American Sign Language (Ameslan), to understand spoken English, and to read printed words.10 Koko's instruction, begun in 1973, is the longest ongoing language study of an ape, and the only one with continuous instruction by the same teacher.

This manifests itself not only in the way in which Aristotelian notions of the «unmoved mover» or neo-Platonic ideas of «being - subsisting from - itself» have been taken to be the proper definition of what is meant when we speak of «God», but also in liturgical language where all too often the basic concept implied or (as most often seems to be the case) affirmed is the utter immutability of deity, along with the rigidly legalistic moralism which it is suggested should mark those who claim to «obey» the divine mandates.

It affects and shapes, not only language, the mode of thinking and speaking, but sensibilities of thought, psychical orientation, thus psychical expectations.

Their children would be Americans, and they did not teach us the German that had been their own first language but which they now spoke only when they wanted to keep things from us.

Even though Spanish is the language spoken on Ibiza, he's only learned one sentence, which is the Spanish for «Please wear a condom!»

For a logic and rhetoric based on a logical model, testimony can only be an alienation of meaning or, to speak the language of Aristotle in the Rhetoric, a means of non-technical proof, that is, external to all the arguments that the orator can invent.

With all due respect, Dr. Borg may have a head of «knowledge» to speak the most advanced Christianese; however, I hope his is a language of the heart and not just of the mind only.

When you can not speak a given people's language, you can only talk at them and not with them.

This is our confession of faith, and the language of worship remains our only way to speak this mystery.

My «prayer language» is spoken usually only when I'm alone, and as you said, do not know what to say to God, thought I have tons of supplication.

Illustrations are shared abundantly: words spoken at the marriage altar, by the judge passing sentence, in the ceremonies of christening and knighting, to name only a few.18 These examples of dynamistic and creative functions of language are the residue of a primative view of the power of speech before words became impoverished.