Sentences with phrase «only studied this book»

I only studied this book and got a free practice exam through PTCB when I signed up around thanksgiving (Black Friday sale).

Not exact matches

Chief strategist Paul Jankowski, who not only authored the study, but also the accompanying book Speak America Too: Your Guide To Building Powerful Brands In The New Heartland, says the proclamation is purposefully provocative.

One classic study, outlined in the book Getting a Job, showed that among the 282 men surveyed, 56 percent had found their jobs through personal contacts, whereas only 19 percent had found theirs through job advertisements and 10 percent through applications of their own initiative,» says the post.

you can ask questions all you want, test it as much as you like but only you can decide to believe.I have studied hell, read my books about, went to different websites and searched the bible, for a Christian to fear hell is not possible.For one Christ himself said he is the only way to the father.So I think the fear of hell comes from guilt or their power freaks.

The authorship of the books of the Bible are only unknown to those who refuse to study.

The Book could be understood only through the study of books.

Although the book is best regarded more as a presentation of the Supreme Court's religious - freedom work than as a direct study of the questions underlying that work» the work of constitutional scholars, for example, is for the most part only referenced, not engaged» it is, nonetheless, recommended.

Pope Benedict's eagerly awaited volume should be seen not only as the second part of his exegetical - theological study of the figure of Jesus in the Gospels, but also as the necessary complement to his book The Spirit of the Liturgy.

A number of recent sociological and psychological studies seem to support Jacob Epstein's assertion in his book Divorced in America that «in divorce there are only smaller and larger disasters.»

This is so sad... apparently you don't know how to study... I hope you have not studied to be a doctor... cause seems youd only read ONE book on medicine and you would call that study and get your degree... the Bible can NOT contain every single piece of info!

They should just burn all their books and study the only book with all the answers anyone would ever need... The Book of Morbook with all the answers anyone would ever need... The Book of MorBook of Mormon.

At the time of this book's first edition (The University of Chicago Press, 1955) it represented the first comprehensive study of Buber's thought in any language, and it is still the only comprehensive study in English.

From the beginning I realized that the proposal was not only large and complex, but that there were a considerable number of people studying the theme who were disposed to collaborate in the publication of the book.

In his book The Evolution of Desire, evolutionary psychologist David Buss notes, «According to a United Nations study of millions of people in forty - five societies, 39 percent of divorces occur when there are no children, 26 percent when there is only a single child, 19 percent where there are two, and less than 3 percent when there are four or more.»

In short, any book designed for those just beginning to study the Bible is a tool, and it had better be a good one, because if it fails, it not only fails me, it fails my friend.

In my current Podcast series on Genesis, I not only use a lot of the Bible study tools available through Logos Bible Software, but I also have over 30 additional commentaries and books I consult for each and every show.

My humble advise to you is to go and study the history that how, when and who wrote these chapters and what type of time it went through and then say that if there is any statement in this book is the real time statements of Jesus PBUH... please be honest with yourself... and don't do anything to please others but only you... and make sure you are convince with this study... whats the difference btwn what is in this book and what was written in a book last year when a Hindu claim himself as God and millions believed in him and still they believe even after his death by being ill... no one asks if I take a human as my God then how could he be ill or eventually be dead?

One needs to work hard to get out of these lies... one should spend time to study the basic principles of the all the books we have around us this time which include the book of Mormon and LDS... then you think what make sense and what not... the accept the true one... I can assure you that there is only one Truth as two can't be truth... you just have to look for it and use ur intellectuals...

Now why not youngsters that attracted to science research and study the locked verses in all known holy books in to one: - One Master Christian holy book - One Master Judos holy book Then both studied and revised with the Holy Quran finding real differences and work out to solve it finding the truth for the sake of truth only through the use of science that they speak of rather than worshiping it?!

It was not by reason, or by the study of books, but only by revelation that Muhammad could know the creative God and the divine attributes.

Not only are graduate theological schools producing more theses and dissertations on Wesleyan subjects, but Methodist periodicals (Quarterly Review, Methodist History, Proceedings of the Wesley Historical Society) are increasingly printing their articles, and new publishing enterprises are emerging to take up their longer monographic works (among these are Zondervan's Francis Asbury Press imprint, Abingdon's Kingswood Books imprint, and Asbury Theological Seminary's new series in Pietist and Wesleyan Studies) These scholars are quite likely to be found in the Wesley Studies Working Group of the American Academy of Religion.

The question of how many men wrote the Book of Isaiah can not be answered by quoting doctrines about the Bible but only by detailed study of the text.

I used to say, «I only want to study the Bible, I don't want to study a book about the Bible, I only want to read and study the Bible.»

In this post, I have only talked about loving others (my wife) and studying books (me), but I imagine there are other passions and interests that some of you might have.

However, through my experiences at Strathclyde University's Catholic Chaplaincy, I have found that not only do these young people rely on books and endless hours of studying in order to pass their exams, but increasingly they also look for spiritual support.

Brother Martin studied an exposition of the Mass by Gabriel Biel — a well - written book, intellectual and inspiring; the author died only twelve years previously.

Mark of Whitstable's book provides glimpses of what such a study might yield, but it is unfortunately only an introduction to that study and serves more to whet the appetite than to satisfy it.

About the conversation with TC Campbell, in his China Study audio version, he mentions that he doesn't eat animal based protein, but this only happen a few years previous to the publication of the book.

By the way, a great book by another skeptical OBGYN is called «Born in the USA» only he's skeptical of medicalized birth because he's a clinical scientist as well, unlike our author here and he's realized that home birth is safer than hospital birth according to peer - reviewed large scale studies.

One week of vacation flew by while I was buried in my books studying for boards (which I can only pray to have passed), and caring for a sick baby Iyla on the days I was actually free.

Information had been collected retrospectively on a random sample of 100 women delivered outside hospital in 1983 and on all women delivered outside hospital in the region in 1988.7 Contemporaneous data were also collected on every delivery outside hospital during 1993.8 In these three studies only 53 %, 55 % (132/240), and 44 % (142/324) of women delivered outside hospital were actually booked for a home birth when labour began.

All we can say with certainty is that, of the 1890 women who were estimated to have booked for home delivery in this region in the last 10 years of the study period, only five lost a baby and intrapartum events were implicated in only one of those deaths.

In their book And Baby Makes Three, the couples therapists John and Julie Gottman, Ph.Ds, studied couples three years after they had a baby and discovered that while men felt desire daily, women felt desire only once a week!

My husband found The Womanly Art of Breastfeeding for me, and I studied this book carefully, making my own notes because I was only borrowing it.

Fagin and Lavelle report in their book, Toxic Deception, that of 43 industry - funded studies, only six «returned unfavorable results.»

«Studies like this one are extremely important to better understand scientific career [s],» notes Geuna, who recently edited a book on the global mobility of research scientists, although the study's results «might not be generalized to the population as the sample includes only «stars»» and excludes postdocs.

And Steven Pinker, a cognitive psychologist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, who studies how infants learn language and was only an infant himself when Chomsky first outlined his theory, has attempted to explain this ambitious quest in a provocative book, The Language Instinct (Review, 26 February).

The point here is that like books in a library, species have value (some of it practical) that may become apparent only when they are studied closely.

In his book, Beckwith points to studies that determine people are actually correct only 85 % of the time when they say they are absolutely 100 % certain of the answer.

Catherine Shanahan, MD, cites in her book Deep Nutrition a study from New Zealand that showed that subjects who ate french fries from a restaurant fryer displayed immediate harm to their endothelial function of their arteries, going from a normal 7 % dilation before eating the french fries to almost NO dilation at all (only 1 %) AFTER eating the french fries.

For a lot of us, the books — even when we've taken the time to carefully read and study a number of them, as you have — can only take us so far.

About the conversation with TC Campbell, in his China Study audio version, he mentions that he doesn't eat animal based protein, but this only happen a few years previous to the publication of the book.

The body of research is is 30 + years old, encompasing thousands of studies and I and my book collaborators — the amazing Tim, who just did an update with Angelo, and Dr. BG, «Grace» (link removed), who just recorded with Dave Asprey (Tim & I are scheduled to go on Dave's show jointly on May 2)-- have been uncovering it, writing about it — and not only here, but in a book (RS is a mere part of it) that now busts at 450 pages, into the thousands of references, and three appendices.

Only a small segment of «The China Study» even discusses the China Study, and Campbell set out to write a publicly accessible book — not an exhaustive discussion of every correlation his research team uncovered.

The «China Study» in the «The China Study» constitutes only one part of a large book.

But, Dr. Perlmutter, I don't see anything in the study about reducing whole carb intake down to the levels you suggest in your book, only eliminating simple carbs, gluten, and being sure that insulin and A1C are at good levels.

All of the research in that book was based on HUMAN studies ONLY.

Dr. Jason Fung is the only person, let alone doctor, that I found who: 1) wasn't just trying to just sell his book by giving tidbits of information but not the full picture; 2) used real research, charts, graphs and studies to support his methods; 3) actually dealt with real people and had proof of helping real people; 4) advocated not just a diet change but pinpointed fasting as the key; 5) told the truth that insulin resistance is the real issue and everything else is just symptoms or effects; 6) said that diabetes could be cured (this by itself is a bold claim); and 7) made himself available to anyone via email, etc..

it's only to point that i recently read on a book that defends Dukan's diet wrote by a MD that happens to have only one kidney since he was a child, and he links the occurence of kidney stones in those children of the early ketogenic studies to the prevailing idea of water in those days, ie, that water should be consumed in small amounts because it was thougth to provoque interferences with ketonic bodies production, and that was though to lessen their positive effects

For me, the only logical thing to do was leave the study book at home, explore the world and just wing it on the test.