«The Place Beyond the Pines» isn't perfect, but it's a movie that demands a lot of respect for not
only taking big risks, but the way that it resonates emotionally, because there just aren't enough films that do that anymore.
«The Place Beyond the Pines» isn't perfect (the first hour makes up for some of the more unflattering heavy - handedness that Cianfrance resorts to in the latter half), but it's a movie that demands a lot of respect for not
only taking big risks, but the way that it resonates emotionally.
Not exact matches
Collins pointed out that a
big part of UK (and indeed US) election law relates to «declaration of spent», before making the conjoined point that if someone is «hiding that spend» — i.e. by placing dark ads that
only the recipient sees, and which can be
taken offline immediately after the campaign — it smells like a major
risk to the democratic process.
Sister Mary Corita chose to answer these questions with the words of William Sloane Coffin: «Because we love the world, we pray now, O [God], for grace to quarrel with it, O Thou whose lover's quarrel with the world is the history of the world... Lord, grant us grace to quarrel with the worship of success and power... to quarrel with all that profanes and trivializes [people] and separates them... number us, we beseech Thee, in the ranks of those who went forth from this place longing
only for those things for which Thou dost make us long, [those] for whom the complexity of the issues
only served to renew their zeal to deal with them, [those] who alleviated pain by sharing it; and [those] who were always willing to
risk something
big for something good... O God,
take our minds and think through them,
take our lips and speak through them.
it seems wenger does nt have the courage to play
big... he does nt
take risks... then he says he was looking at the player of the moment, or he said the same speech u already gave to us to defend something that is, for me,
only stubborness and lack of diligence... about granit: do nt start with formal arguments, go to the bone, u know what i mean... u cant said xhaka was the good choise while we did nt see hin play for our colours... i hope he could be the player that we need, but nobody can said that today
He has had two months to sort out our squad for the new season and he is already doing makeshifts and
taking a
big risks with Sanchez, who hasn't had a decent rest for the past two seasons and he has
only just recovered from a swollen ankle injury!?
For me the
only question is whether OG can continue to score at the rate he has this year — frankly I have my doubts because I am naturally pessimistic — but if he can than then I fail to see the point in
taking a punt to replace him with a
big name that will come with
big money and a
big risk.
- Wenger can be so insane to do it.The man is out of this world and complety insane.He can not see what it is obvious for the entire world.To have better players on the bench and to keep favouring the same out - of - form or not good enough players week after week is madness.To play for draw from the beginning against an awful team which got beaten by the entire league on a daily bases - this is something unimaginable.It is not Mertesacker fault for being embarrased by any player on the planet, it is the manager fault for exposing him as a laughing point of focus.Wenger must go, the man is deluded, he is scarred to
take any
risk for success.Well, guess what -
only showing courage and breaking the
risk can bring you success.Not the case - I predict a chain of defeats following, with the cherry on top being a
big defeat against Spurs - a team which, despite our hate, plays real football (with great results I must say).
Pedro starting was the
big news ahead of the game, despite the La Liga season
only starting this weekend, Jose Mourinho
took a
risk with his fitness.
But we're all
taking part in a great
big lab experiment as these chemicals are pumped into the environment and retracted — like lead and PCBs —
only after it becomes obvious that they pose serious health
risks.
«I find that it's
only when I'm
taking those
big risks that I really learn who I am.
Most games
only offer you the illusion of choice (yes Bioware, I'm looking at ME3 and Dragon Age 2) I've been let down by a lot of
big game series and it has become rather rare that game studios are willing to
take risks.
Though Season Four isn't as strong as previous years (it's the
only one not to be nominated for an Emmy), that's partly because the show underwent a pretty significant evolution, introducing more characters and
taking bigger risks with the storytelling, which expanded the show's mythology in the process.
But it's
only because The House That Iron Man Built makes it look that way: Marvel knows what it does best, but at the same time, they are constantly learning from their mistakes and aren't afraid to
take big risks.
And finally, and this I think is the
big reason why many don't
take the plunge, you stand completely alone beside your work,
taking a huge
risk that, even after all your labors the
only sound to reach your ears is the eerie silence of your one hand clapping (the other one is, of course, occupied holding up your book to a world that doesn't give a shish.)
And even if you could, you need to be willing to finance the necessary inventory — a
big enough
risk that
only previously successful authors would be willing to
take.
The catch here is that the market is
only 100 pips from your breakeven point on the whole trade, so there's a
bigger potential of the whole position getting stopped at breakeven... the good part is you have increased your potential for profit without
taking on any more
risk.
In my small unique book «The small stock trader» I also had more detailed overview of tens of stock trading mistakes (http://thesmallstocktrader.wordpress.com/2012/06/25/stock-day-trading-mistakessinceserrors-that-cause-90-of-stock-traders-lose-money/): • EGO (thinking you are a walking think tank, not accepting and learning from you mistakes, etc.) • Lack of passion and entering into stock trading with unrealistic expectations about the learning time and performance, without realizing that it often
takes 4 - 5 years to learn how it works and that even +50 % annual performance in the long run is very good • Poor self - esteem / self - knowledge • Lack of focus • Not working ward enough and treating your stock trading as a hobby instead of a small business • Lack of knowledge and experience • Trying to imitate others instead of developing your unique stock trading philosophy that suits best to your personality • Listening to others instead of doing your own research • Lack of recordkeeping • Overanalyzing and overcomplicating things (Zen - like simplicity is the key) • Lack of flexibility to adapt to the always / quick - changing stock market • Lack of patience to learn stock trading properly, wait to enter into the positions and let the winners run (inpatience results in overtrading, which in turn results in high transaction costs) • Lack of stock trading plan that defines your goals, entry / exit points, etc. • Lack of
risk management rules on stop losses, position sizing, leverage, diversification, etc. • Lack of discipline to stick to your stock trading plan and
risk management rules • Getting emotional (fear, greed, hope, revenge, regret, bragging, getting overconfident after
big wins, sheep - like crowd - following behavior, etc.) • Not knowing and understanding the competition • Not knowing the catalysts that trigger stock price changes • Averaging down (adding to losers instead of adding to winners) • Putting your stock trading capital in 1 - 2 or more than 6 - 7 stocks instead of diversifying into about 5 stocks • Bottom / top fishing • Not understanding the specifics of short selling • Missing this market / industry / stock connection, the
big picture, and
only focusing on the specific stocks • Trying to predict the market / economy instead of just listening to it and going against the trend instead of following it
««The
biggest risk is not
taking any
risk... In a world that changing really quickly, the
only strategy that is guaranteed to fail is not
taking risks.
Most people can
only achieve that by
taking bigger risks, and investing in themselves.
This not
only exacerbates the first point above, but it results in an incentive structure which is asymmetric (heads, I win
big... tails, I don't lose) leading to excessive
risk -
taking.
As Mark Zuckerberg (Co-founder of Facebook) says — «The
biggest risk is not
taking any
risk... In a world that changing really quickly, the
only strategy that is guaranteed to fail is not
taking risks.»
Having
only a fraction of the number of employees giant publishers like EA or Activision have allows Gamecock to
take bigger risks, Hesse said.
Developed by Hello Games, the independent studios massive world and gameplay theme of exploration, discovery, and combat is something
only an indie studio would
take the
risk of developing during the current trend of
big budget game development.
Your Franklin provider is
taking a
big risk on you, so it's
only fair that those who want more coverage are able to get it by paying an increased fee.
For people who have never been married,
taking that step means getting into the unknown, and when it comes to money, making
big risks is
only good in the business sector, but not when it comes to relationships.