Sentences with phrase «only teach their best»

It not only teaches a good foundation but more importantly PREVENTS so many undesirable traits.

Not exact matches

Now she's teaching dozens of participants not only the basics of dog grooming and the fundamentals of being an good employee, but also helping them sort out the other logistical and life challenges that stand in the way of a career in the pet beautification business..

But where the fun really starts is with the free app that not only teaches kids about the whys and hows of good oral hygiene, it also turns brushing into a game.

A good leadership development program not only teaches the X's and O's of your business, but also prepares them for the moment.

In this article, I will teach you how to discern a good, effective binary options robots from robots whose only purpose is to take an investor's money.

She developed the first SEO Copywriting Certification program, which remains the only industry - endorsed training program that teaches SEO best practices.

But they all will help teach you how to think more clearly, which is the only way to become a wiser and better investor.

If not, Henry's questions will force me to accept, and to teach him, that the only proper response is to give up football for good.

The Bible teaches that only Christ's work on the cross is good enough and that people's works «are as fil.thy rags»... we aren't good people and don't do good works.

It can be well demonstrated that, as far as Jewish biblical teaching goes, idolatry is proscribed only for Jews.

And mainline denominations teach this as well, so who is this «some» that thinks the only way to know God is through the church?

What Jefferson couldn't foresee, but which Spalding knows well, is that such mandates can only work if the teachers charged with teaching the principles reject reigning dogmas which reject the very possibility of truth.

Gadamer singles out human dialogue only by way of analogy» because that is the paradigm we know best, the model that will teach us our proper relation to the world.

They don't claim to replace anyone, or be above anyone, Mormons teach that God will take the good to heaven and only the truly evil go to hell.

I just want to testify, for those who are questioning or unsure about Calvinism, that it asserts a false and unlivable theology, teaching that God loves only some, and cruelly punishes the rest, whom he rendered unable to do good for — yep — not doing what he made them incapable of doing.

We think, «If only I had the opportunity to teach a bigger group, then I would prepare better, and teach with more conviction.

The only difference here is that he taught that score keeping will not make us do good.

Like me, many choose to live out what the Church has always taught about sex, namely that it is a good gift from God that is only for marriage between a woman and a man.

«They are flying solo for the first time, and we want to not only teach, but to nurture souls as well,» Fredrickson said.

In Dear James, the catalyst is not only the teachings of the Church but its sacred places as well.

They teach that while we are initially saved by faith alone, we are not really justified until we die, and only if you have lived a good life up to that time.

Same goes for theologies that suggest the poor are poor because of their sins, that if only the sick had more faith or gave more money they would be healed, that the tsunami or the earthquake or the flood that devastated a community was clearly the result of God's wrath on its gay inhabitants, that we can stop rape by teaching women to cover up better, that sex before marriage makes a person «broken» and «unwanted.»

He was active early in the second century CE and is well known for having posited not one but two Gods, one represented in the Old Testament and seen as responsible for the world's creation, the other encountered only in the New Testament in the teaching of Jesus and specifically in the theology of Paul.

I observe that you teach us only a portion of the sacred writings — the best as I view it — and I infer that you reject the teachings of the rabbis to the effect that the words of the law are the very words of God, having been with God in heaven even before the times of Abraham and Moses.

Even if evil and suffering is a teaching tool, an all good God would only allow as much evil or suffering as is absolutely necessary, in order to achieve a greater purpose.

Not only does he have allies in defending the teaching of the Church, but he also has people who are tuned into formative parochial apostolate as well as overwhelmingly generous in giving their time and energy to the Church.

If his teachings are heeded, John Paul's sainthood will not only be a blessing for the Church, but a renewed American republic as well.

This phrasing of faith, impossible in the first years of the Christian movement, emerged only when the convictions of the church were so well formulated that the acceptance of orthodox teaching could be a major criterion of Christian discipleship.

As for teaching English, the best way to learn a language is for the teacher to only speak the language you are learning.

Only for him who wills the Good in truth, only for him can what is taught about the punishments of eternity be eternally tOnly for him who wills the Good in truth, only for him can what is taught about the punishments of eternity be eternally tonly for him can what is taught about the punishments of eternity be eternally true.

Unfortunately, both of these books are pointless because 90 % of people do nt use the books for the good teachings, only how we need to destroy and create havoc because another group does nt believe in the same thing we do..

@US Patriot If a person follows the teachings of Jesus to his best ability, maybe even without knowing about Jesus, I think only God can judge whether he is Christian enough, but I don't mind you disagreeing on that point.

For example, if a denomination declared in their doctrinal statement that the Bible teaches that all good Christians must wear pink hats and only those people who wear pink hats can indeed be true followers of Jesus, we would conclude upon reading this statement that we would never be accepted by those folks because we don't agree with this bit of ridiculous theology.

My God offers us only good things and does not push us into bad things to teach us a lesson.

Modernist philosophy teaches that when we lost God, we lost only a projection of the best that was in ourselves; what was real in that projection therefore remains, and only the illusion is gone.

Not only did they interfere with native religions, but they taught the kids English and generally did their best to prepare them for assimilation into the majority culture.

While I appreciate the approach that DTS teaches, it can really only be followed by expert scholars and theologians, and is not feasible for the average student of Scripture, which indicates to me that it is not the only oven the best way of reading and interpreting the biblical text.

I identify as one, but only because I choose to follow Jesus» teachings as best I can.

More important and more difficult to deal with than such differences in teaching on will and freedom, however, is a wall known only too well by those of us who have worked with Omega to help it make its Point: the wall of what Catholics are tempted pridefully to call pietistic faith and what Protestants are tempted cynically to call superstition.

Islam teaches that you only have to wish good for your brother, not actually do it as Christ says.

Today, in the third generation of his writing, speaking, and teaching, Martin Buber is without question not only the representative figure of Western European Jewry but of world Jewry as well.

well just thinking about these wars in the muslim / mid-east world over religious differences (which may reflect mental states in many ways) in a world where most realize that living in the present moment is best way to happiness and being in the moment in non-strife and awareness through the teachings of masters such as found in the buddhist, taoist, zen, etc., etc., etc. spriritually based practices of religious like thought and teachings, etc. that to ask these scientifically educated populace whom have access to vast amounts of knowledges and understandings on the internet, etc. to believe in past beliefs that perhaps gave basis and inspiration to that which followed — but is not the end all of all times or knowledges — and is thus — non self - sustaining in a belief that does not encompass growth of knowledge and understanding of all truths and being as it is or could be — is to not respect the intelligence and minds and personage of even themselves — not to be disrespected nor disrespectful in any way — only to point out that perhaps too much is asked to put others into the cloak of blind faith and adherance to the past that disregards the realities of the present and the potential of the future... so you try to live in the past — and destroy your present and your future — where is the intelligence in that — and why do people continually fear monger or allow to be fear — mongered into this destructive vision of the future based upon the past?

Muslim's Lifestyle: he teachings of Islam not only set forth a stern religion, but they govern the total life of the believers as well.

Of course he was no literary artist, but only a humble clerk, not very familiar with Judaism or with the Old Testament; perhaps he had never seen Palestine in his life, but he had a good memory, and he had heard a great deal about that land, or rather about the Master who had lived and taught there.

Pope Benedict's decision to lift the excommunications, in hopes of healing the divide, provided certain Catholic teachings are finally accepted by the Society, is well - intentioned, and we can only pray it bears good fruit, in light of continuing concerns.

I mean only that the basic Christian teaching that we should be concerned for others as well as for ourselves was taken for granted as normative.

And as far as the Jerusalem controversy, I would suggest that that debate was a good display of God giving a view of how men bring in false teaching, only to have God use his voices to make right a wrong view being introduced to the Church.

Jesus taught that one can not only lose rewards but eternal life as well in places like Luke 12:35 - 48:

All in all this book is very good and written with the vigour and zeal of someone who clearly enjoys being a Catholic and feels that traditions which help us to teach the faith are not only worth maintaining but encourage us to feast and be merry.

The blessings and joys of eternal life only get better and better the longer you are with Jesus and the longer you let Him teach you.