Sentences with phrase «only teaches them life»

Not exact matches

Not only does it make my life easier, but teaching her to take care of herself and her things will — we hope — help her be more independent and self - sufficient as she grows up.

Now she's teaching dozens of participants not only the basics of dog grooming and the fundamentals of being an good employee, but also helping them sort out the other logistical and life challenges that stand in the way of a career in the pet beautification business..

It taught me that whatever I needed to do in my life for a job, it had to be something I would do for free, because that's the only way I could justify spending the hours in the day.

It seems to me that Notre Dame has done an outstanding job not only of teaching him to think, but of building a perspective on the meaning of life.

So, not only do we think you're an idiot for actually believing in a magical, all - powerful, invisible man who lives in the sky and demands things of you, we think you're an idiot for turning your back on the teachings of this magical, all - powerful, invisible man who lives in the sky.

The philosophies and teaching were not new, there were only revelutionary in the backwards area he lived in.

At the time of death, there are no books or philosophy, or even religious teachings... It's just you and your loved ones, alive or dead, but only the closest people in your life.

It is time for the new / younger generation of LDS to wise - up, follow your instincts; study and live by the teachings of the Bible (only).

At the end of each episode we'd have a very cleverly written message that teaches a profound message like «Drugs take the life you want away» or «That factor is dullness only suitable to those who are dullards.»

Romney understands that you teach a man to fish he has abundant life, you give him a fish only, the one meal soon comes to an end.

To embrace only the teachings which one prefers, or those which are easiest to understand or integrate into one's life, is akin to pulling out the tapestry's threads and unraveling the whole.

It's a teaching technique to contrast those who live by the Spirit that transforms and those who try to live by a Law that only kills.

Only living persons are to be baptized, for just before Jesus ascension to heaven, he gave the command to his eleven faithful apostles: «Go therefore and make disciples of people of all the nations, baptizing them... teaching then to observe all the things I have commanded you.»

These questions define the subject matter of the study of divinity, and Christians have believed through the ages that these questions can be adequately answered only as each generation appropriates the teaching passed on by the original witnesses of God's self - revelation in the life, death, and resurrection of Christ.

it's insane how you know so little of your own religion and how you go against your Christs teaching with such arrogant and disdain towards atheist and other religions your nothing but a bigot and hatemonger your world is only black and white and you can't fathom how a country can have so many different people with different believes that don't match yours and can live peacefully without your christs.

Not only have the Jews survived as a people, but many are still observant, that is, they remain faithful to the covenant, as expressed in Deuteronomy: «And now, O Israel, give heed to the statutes and the ordinances which I teach you, and do them; that you may live, and go in and take possession of the land which the Lord, the God of your fathers, gives you.»

Since no one has yet to SEE an atom, the idea of the structure of the atom can only be inferred by experimental evidence — yet I see no Republican trying to stop teaching the structure of the atom in school — oh that's right, its because major corporations and industries rely on this science (pharm, weapons manufacturers etc etc) whereas the theory of evolution is merely think piece of scientists on how life on Earth changes over time.

In fact, Niebuhr taught that the egotism of the individual only becomes more powerful when collected into a group, to the extent that an individual's egotistical will - to - live takes on the more evil will - to - power, that is, coercion becomes the modus - operendi of the group.

After the service an an elderly man, who taught and lived Jesus - like as no one I'd ever seen previously, walked up to me and said, «I heard what he said, but it was only words».

Like me, many choose to live out what the Church has always taught about sex, namely that it is a good gift from God that is only for marriage between a woman and a man.

Only way to eliminate hindu Judaism, criminal secular ism to teach hindus criminals to live like civil human.

Without compromising the church's traditional teaching that sexual intercourse is appropriate only within the covenant relationship, pastors should be prepared to provide relevant and reliable information on this life - and - death matter.

There are only 2 - 3 verses in the New Testament that are used to teach this idea, but a study of the context indicates that either Spirit baptism is in view (not water baptism) or that the result of the water baptism is not eternal life, but something else entirely.

Noble to give a hindu self his medicine of terrorism Allah, to have peace, among criminal, Only way to hindu secular ism to teach hindus criminals to live like human.

This will not only help bring the Bible to life in your own reading of Scripture, but also if you are preparing to teach a Bible Study or preach a sermon.

Eve mirrors Adam's enfleshment and teaches him that his life's beatitude will lie in neither mere sensation nor in a false spiritualism, but only in the act of incarnate love.

They teach that while we are initially saved by faith alone, we are not really justified until we die, and only if you have lived a good life up to that time.

Living in low - income housing, teaching free literacy classes to refugees, setting up basketball camps for bored inner - city kids: all of it had a few costs for me personally, sure, but the holy buzz of pats on the back from friends and church people, and the feeling that I was the only person really getting what Jesus was saying — this more than made up for doing without.

Their lived experience of the effects of contraception, abortion, divorce, and infidelity on their generation has made them passionate about the need for our entire culture - not only Catholics - to embrace the challenge andauthentic freedom embodied in the fullness of the Church's teaching on marriage, family, and sexuality.

Fairy tales have always taught us a certain truth, that life has a set of rules that we didn't set up, and we will only be happy if we follow them (another big point of Chesterton's).

Living in the midst of a culture of death, the only teaching that these witnesses of the Third Millennium find «relevant» isdynamic fidelity to the Magisterium of the Catholic Church.

Teachings about the Trinity, the Incarnation, and so forth that have not only been grounded in large portions of Scripture but have also been accepted by the vast majority of Christians in history — those we can pretty much give our lives to.

Ironically, the only reason I am «Free Grace» today is because I was willing to consider exegetical evidence for a view that was contrary to what I had held and been taught my entire life.

But the concept of the personal and personal values can be taught only where they can also be caught in community life where one can «speak the truth in love» and learn and assimilate it in that process.

When we apply this position to Diem's original criticism of Käsemann, that the latter presented Jesus as only teaching general truths rather than the kerygma, it becomes clear that Diem has overlooked the crucial point: Käsemann went beyond the view that Jesus taught God's fatherhood and man's freedom, to the assertion that «God has drawn near man in grace and requirement,» and Jesus «brought and lived the freedom of the children of God».

Not only did the exigencies of the life of the first Christians, with the problems they had to face, occasion the handing on of the tales and the teaching, and to a large degree determine how the tales and the teaching were to be communicated.

It reflects the theology of those who thought of Jesus exclusively in apocalyptic terms, and were prepared not only to go through the tradition and substitute «the Son of Man» for his simple «I,» but also to insert appropriate quotations or paraphrases of their favorite apocalyptic texts in order to give his life its appropriate setting — as they assumed — and his teaching its proper interpretation.

The factors of chief importance in the development of this theology were: (a) the Old Testament — and Judaism --(b) the tradition of religious thought in the Hellenistic world, (c) the earliest Christian experience of Christ and conviction about his person, mission, and nature — this soon became the tradition of the faith or the «true doctrine» — and (d) the living, continuous, ongoing experience of Christ — only in theory to be distinguished from the preceding — in worship, in preaching, in teaching, in open proclamation and confession, as the manifestation of the present Spiritual Christ within his church.

It has inspired me to reconnect to the life and teachings of Jesus, as opposed to only focusing on his death.

Americans are only concerned with Muslims who believe in Muhammad, how he lived his life, and what he taught in Qur «an.

They live every day of their lives in fear, in poverty, have only been taught that if the «just believe» they will go to heaven and be with Jesus — a deliberate distraction away from Jesus» real teachings.

They are not only practices of teaching and learning, but also practices of raising funds and maintaining the school's resources; not only practices of governing various aspects of the school's common life, but also practices of various kinds of research; practices not only of assessing students and when they should be deemed to have completed their courses of study, but also of assessing faculty and judging when they should be promoted and when terminated; and so on.

The resolution called on the council to reaffirm the doctrine and «continue to require our credentialed ministers to not only have the aforementioned Pentecostal experience in their own lives, but [to] actively preach and teach this...

Which is why I taught my son, to be respectful of the women in his life, and not to make intimate decisions or to look at women using only the «outter brain».

Only to be repeated in this day in age by brainwashed followers of a church that has never even taught a real sermon in their lives.

Or was it only an event in the lives of the disciples — a change in their outlook as they came to realize through further reflection upon their dead and buried Teacher, that his influence still lived on, that his teaching had been true, that his life must be their example and his character a pattern for themselves to follow, that although he was dead he must still be revered in their memory as their Lord whose spirit could still be recreated in themselves in so far as they dedicated themselves to the aim of following in his footsteps?

So, it is Christ his life, example, character and teaching who is our guide and our primary lens, not only for biblical interpretation but for doing life.

And not only when we compare it with the setting of the life of Stone Age men, but also when we measure it by the framework within which the Church itself lived in those earlier times which constituted the classical periods of the Church's life and teaching.

The sometimes almost desperate conservatives must be taught to understand, not only theoretically but instinctively and in their spiritual life, that the Church does not exist outside time and history; that she is indeed founded on the grace of Christ, but is nevertheless a very human institution burdened by history.

The Church for them is not only the sacramental intermediary of grace and the teaching authority for the true statement of the hidden mysteries of God, but also has a pastoral power by which it can contribute quite considerably to determining the concrete action of its members in the tangible and sober reality of everyday life.