Sentences with phrase «only thing in question»

Not exact matches

Not only did he score just 11 points, including none in the fourth quarter, but things got worse after the game when he had a confrontation with a fan and took a shot at a Cleveland radio host for only asking questions after the Cavs lose.

Steps to not only answer the question, but more importantly, master the process for success in achieving your «one thing» are covered.

The only thing worse than not asking your customers and prospects questions about their needs and desires is to fail to respond in a convincing, informative and timely manner to their questions and comments.

A culture that not only tolerates, but welcomes questioning and dissent may make things quite uncomfortable in the short term for the status quo, but in the long term, it's essential for any company, government, or system to thrive.

In a more perfect House of Commons, such a backbencher — and this is not to single Mr. Toet out, only to use him as a convenient example — would be in the House during Question Period to do two things: represent his constituents and hold the government to accounIn a more perfect House of Commons, such a backbencher — and this is not to single Mr. Toet out, only to use him as a convenient example — would be in the House during Question Period to do two things: represent his constituents and hold the government to accounin the House during Question Period to do two things: represent his constituents and hold the government to account.

Thomas thinks that it is the discipline of metaphysics that asks questions about the ultimate cause of existence of things, and, as he says, «not only does faith hold that there is creation, reason also demonstrates it» (In II Sent., dist.

Considering evidence and observation are the ways in which we learn things to be true in the real world, I find it ironical that for the ultimate truth we are to ask no questions, observe no evidence and make only an emotional connection.

My question wasn't that it would be surprising if we came in contact with an extraterrestrial race that had a religion of their own (it would only be slightly surprising given that I personally believe in order to jump to the next stage where we can travel the stars, we must get rid of the one thing that holds back sceintific progress: religion).

I am only an ordinary human being nor an Angel nor a Prophet... am only quoting what my Holy Book has told me that GOD the Only was the creator of every thing in the universe... But to ask me who created GOD to me is unsensable questionly an ordinary human being nor an Angel nor a Prophet... am only quoting what my Holy Book has told me that GOD the Only was the creator of every thing in the universe... But to ask me who created GOD to me is unsensable questionly quoting what my Holy Book has told me that GOD the Only was the creator of every thing in the universe... But to ask me who created GOD to me is unsensable questiOnly was the creator of every thing in the universe... But to ask me who created GOD to me is unsensable question..

Jesus is answering their question, and basically says that the only thing they need to «do» is believe in Jesus.

Not only does the pluralism in question characterize past and present construals of the Christian thing and their respective social and cultural locations; it also characterizes particular theological schools, the practices that constitute them, and their respective social and cultural locations.

Ok, so first off, I think in terms of proof, the only thing that would justify as proof to me would be direct contact with a «god being», but even then a lot of questioning and experimentation would be needed to rule out other possibilities.

The only thing he is interested in is the money he can make by saying things the uneducated will not question.

In The Brothers Karamazov, things happen around the Grand Inquisitor that answer his questions, but he can not see that because he wants only one form of answer — a severely reduced form that depends on reasoning alone, stripped of faith or emotion.

What the proposal does argue is this: Study of various subject matters in a theological school will be the indirect way to truer understanding of God only insofar as the subject matters are taken precisely as interconnected elements of the Christian thing, and that can be done concretely by studying them in light of questions about their place and role in the actual communal life of actual and deeply diverse Christian congregations.

In order to answer the questions that have emerged from this consideration of scholastic concepts relating to the efficient causality of finite things, we must assume two propositions which - can only be formulated here but not really proved.

Sister Mary Corita chose to answer these questions with the words of William Sloane Coffin: «Because we love the world, we pray now, O [God], for grace to quarrel with it, O Thou whose lover's quarrel with the world is the history of the world... Lord, grant us grace to quarrel with the worship of success and power... to quarrel with all that profanes and trivializes [people] and separates them... number us, we beseech Thee, in the ranks of those who went forth from this place longing only for those things for which Thou dost make us long, [those] for whom the complexity of the issues only served to renew their zeal to deal with them, [those] who alleviated pain by sharing it; and [those] who were always willing to risk something big for something good... O God, take our minds and think through them, take our lips and speak through them.

Both questions lead in the same direction, toward the possibility of a provisional and qualified answer: if the character of happening only once is held to belong to the truth and measure of all things in their very reality, then there is indeed an essence which more than any other satisfies this truth - criterion, and this is the pure essence of time: time taken in itself, or pure movement — movement irrespective of any possible differentiation into the different kinds of movement.

I remember being in some church meetings way back when the pastors told the congregation, suspiciously in the absence of the people in questions, why certain people left, only to find out that things were actually much different.

He has, to be sure, answered this question, not only in his Scripture but in the very constitution of our natures: to choose life, to be fruitful and multiply, and to walk in his ways, which means among other things to understand that life makes sense and that human fulfillment resides in resisting the ever - present temptation to return to tohu vavohu — the primordial chaos and void.

I am not sure why you told me the same thing is stated unless you only saw what you didn't like in my question and stopped reading.

Gil you have asked some very good questions why does bad things happen in the world i personally do nt know God did nt explain to Job either why he had to suffer.What i do know is that God desires that none of us should perish but that all would have eternal life in him through Jesus Christ.This world will one day pass away and the real world will be reborn so our focus as christians is on whats to come and being a witness in the here and now.Both good and bad happens to either the righteous or the sinner so what are we to make of that.What we do know is that God will set all things right at the appointed time the wicked will be judged and the righteous will be rewarded for there faith isnt that enough reason for us to believe.Free will is only a reality if we can choose between good and bad but our hearts are deceitfully wicked we naturally are inclined toward sin that is another reason whyt we need to be saved from ourselves so what are we to do.For me Christ died and rose again that is a fact witnessed by over 500 people that were alive at the time and was recorded by historians how many other religious leaders do you know that did that or did the miracles that Jesus did.As far as the bible is concerned much of the archelogical evidence has proven to be correct and many of prophetic words spoken many hundreds of years ago have come to pass including both the birth and the death of Jesus.Interested in what philosophy you are believing in if other than a faith in Jesus Christ so how does that philosophy give you the assurance that you are saved.Its really simple with christianity we just have to believe in Jesus Christ.brentnz

Since in other things I have said on this question I have expressly stressed the importance of existentialist philosophy, I would like to emphasize here that I certainly do not think of it as the only important resource.

The fourth sort of case would be a perceptually meaningful alternative to the third only if the «other things» were known independently to be inherently perceptible in the latter, yet all efforts to establish that knowledge - claim appear to be question - begging.

had to reply to your simplistic view of things... remember we are only human yet GOD is perfect, all powerful, all knowing and as humans we will never be able to see things from an omnipotent viewpoint such as GOD's... so remember bad things happen daily and it is GOD's will but who are we to question GOD allmighty when we only think in mindset of humans... do nt let ur foolish pride put a spotlight on ur ignorance...

Though some things in the book may strike the reader as unrealistic, the question in which it centers is not only searching, but basic to a true perspective.

The only thing that the Christian community has a problem with in defining our religion as Christian is a question of historicity.

Those of us Protestants whose heritage is relatively congregational may sometimes find ourselves thinking things would be better if only we had bishops to provide the sort of guidance that gives the church theological direction in a world that constantly raises new and difficult questions.

Mind you that wasn't the only thing you said in that particular thread that led me to the conclusion that attempting to have any real dialogue with you was pointless and I was already well on the way to that point from the countless encounters of you avoiding questions and offering nothing more to support your stance than «I'm right and you're wrong» or «read it again, it's clear».

To me the question of god is to big for man to know, we could never know if such a thing is true and the only real way to know is in death and faith, it is to me just to big for us to know.

@Joxer The obvious question, the elephant in the room, is why, if everything they say is true, is it, that the only thing to support it all is a questionable «shroud»?

and its unbelievably simple to make It is perfect for those mornings where sweetness is out of question and you need to get in something savory Feel free to go on instagram and post what you came up with with #thehealthyhabitblog, I'd love to see it < 3 You only need a few things to make this protein filled breakfast Ingredients: - Half Palm Size Firm Tofu -3 / 4 Cherry Tomatos - Handful Spinach -1 tbs Nutritional Yeast - Drop of...

Question: as the only thing holding me back are the oats and oat flour, do you think these might work with, maybe ground almonds and almond flour in its place??

One of those things I tried only once when I was very young and promptly turned my nose up at... until a post like this comes and makes me question if perhaps I've been too hasty in dismissing it...

The thing is I'm currently living in São Paulo brazil and I have a cook who only speaks Portuguese So my question is do you have your cook books published in Portuguese??

Cant say i didn't question eating the whole thing in one go — lucky they're rich enough to only have one or two!

I have always found Mr. Brown to be informative with regards to not only the origins of the food in question, but explains things in a fashion that even my «uncook», as my husband calls himself, feels able to make the day's highlighted food.

Now, ahead of the Japanese GP, the FIA has clarified that the thing that was against the rules is still against the rules, only now they're actually going to take action when people break it, which begs the question: if they weren't going to bother enforcing the rule, why did it exist in the first place?

I would not eqbt to see that match... sure walcott can take the place of alexis when the second has been more important for us in 3 years than the first in 10 years... im not ok with alexis attitude yesterday but u do nt know if that was because he was sustituted... maybe he was not ok with his performance or he want mire goals, and thats ok for me, that attituted u will never see in theo because he born here under wenger and he is ok with his wages that he do nt deserve and being 4th... im ok with alexis attitud in boros game, because a draw was not enought for arsenal, and im ok with him when he ask for the salary he does diserve... for me he is one of the best in the epl, maybe the best, and without any question who makes things happen in our team... he deserves 200 or 250k a week more than any in our team, even moseur wenger... ozil deserve 180k only because he is going up with his performances and have show more attitud than ever... ur famous theo deserve 80k or go and play at west ham

General question: How are the ways some players, managers, plays, careers, futures and other portions of Tiger baseball being questioned or denigrated on occasion, through articles and comments on this blog, in line with only quietly say nice things about people when they make a mistake?

I don't think its worthwhile changing keeper, Ospina has barely had a season in the league and the only thing people seem to be questioning is his height, because it damn sure isn't those clean sheets or saves he has been making recently.

There is no real answer to the question you have posed because this club has once again hedged their bets on doing the bare minimum then hoping for the best... if they were serious about changing the stagnant culture that has permeated the club since our move from the Highbury, we would have immediately released and / or moved several players in the early days of the window... this would have demonstrated to the fans that they were serious about addressing our obvious inadequacies... likewise this would have forced them to bring in replacements because they couldn't have used the lame excuse Wenger is presently spewing about having too many players... we functionally have the same amount of players as we did when the window first opened but he didn't say jack about it then... he simply waited until the inevitable happened then pulled out his excuse Rolodex, closed his eyes and randomly drew the «too many players» card... the more he opens his mouth, the more I understand his «god» complex when it relates to all things Arsenal... what other manager could continually do the same dumb shit, not address obvious concerns for years, speak to the fans in such a condescending manner, face enormous criticism from many of his former star players and be the architect of so many failed player signings yet be one of the highest paid managers with the longest tenure in Europe... maybe Kroenke is colourblind and instead of seeing all the red flags he can only see the GREEN ones ($ $ $)

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

It's the fans that keep sacrificing because this team can't get their head out of their own ass... please give me some examples when a top club ever let their best player leave for free at the end of a season... Wenger needs to go to PSG and get some money and talent for Sanchez so that we can end this nonsense once and for all... then he needs to publicly apologize for the way in which they handled the whole situation... if they allow Sanchez to go for free there is no way this club, under the tutelage of Kroenke and Wenger, will ever layout the necessary coin to replace such a talented player, especially considering that Wenger will be a lame - duck manager once again in the final year of his contract and we know how well that went last year... open your eyes people, Wenger has spoken publicly about how he hopes that the next manager can take this club to the next level... WHAT?!?... he then went on to speak about leaving them in the perfect position to be successful, which is one of the reasons why several pundits felt Wenger would leave after last season based on the financials and the fact that so many players had only one year left on their respective contracts... who says this shit??? If you believe you're leaving things in the best possible shape for your potential successor to achieve greatness it raises a couple of serious questions: Why can't you take things to the next level if everything is as great as you say?

if the question is «if the nation could do only one thing, fix school food, or fix food in the home to prevent child hood obesity, which would it be» that would be a tough question.

One thing I didn't mention in my original response, but which informed everything I wrote, was the part in the initial question about how S and her husband are always fighting and how even when A and Nikki were in her town for a visit S still only wanted to stay home and watch her daughter play.

We are not just talking about baby issues right now it's all about mom and so if you have any questions like that, reach out to us and the cool thing we do is we not only try to get those questions answered but we include your question and the expert's answer in a future episode.

Also bear in mind that 11 months is one of those bumpy times in feeding (the other one I seem to get tons of questions about is 20 months, and that's all about control) when kids sometimes just seem to stop eating solids for some reason (lots of times it seems like they only want to eat things they can self - feed, which doesn't work too well if they don't have many teeth yet).

The fact is, we have become so conditioned to believe that the usual method of beginning our infants with runny rice cereal, gradually progressing through smooth then lumpier purees, in defined quantities and on a defined schedule, keeping flavours bland and simple — is the right and indeed the only way to do things, that we don't even think about even questioning why this is the way we do it.

Please, either answer (please do, right now I've only one answer that addresses the question and even that then veers off into territory I said to avoid) or comment in a way that is helpful for answering the question, right now the ratio in the comments of that kind of thing is low.