Sentences with phrase «only those things employers»

Just about the only thing an employer won't see on your credit report is your credit score [source: Kane].

Though grades aren't the only thing an employer looks at, having good grades does make landing a job easier in many cases.

This is really the only thing employers care about.

The only thing an employer can ask to broach the subject is, «Have you ever been convicted of a crime?»

Sure your resume's brand sets the reader's first impression, but it's not the only thing employers check in the process.

Because your resume may be the only thing employers have when deciding whether or not to offer you a chance to interview, you need to make sure your resume is as strong as possible.

«The only thing the employer would need to do is do a payroll deduction,» he says.

Not exact matches

That's only if the company has at least one full - time employee eligible for a premium assistance tax credit or cost - sharing reduction created by the legislation - and analysts say that eligibility isn't an easy thing to judge, meaning all larger employers could face the responsibility come tax - time.

The only thing you can pray for, it's that your husband's employer decides to invest money for his green card.

surely the fact that Wenger has to get cheap tranafers like Kolasinac and greek guy with only kne big signing per window ahows the budget he has to play with Gazidis is the snake who keeps saying we will spend big and have huge budget to pass all the blame to Wenger who is loyal and wont say bad things about hias employers!

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

Don't include things such as «I like to read», only include information about yourself that can get employers talking.

Using 50 % VAT on luxury yachts to reduce the taxes paid by the manufacturer of luxury yachts and their employer would be no bad thing; redistribution isn't the only goal of the tax system, if it were we'd have no tax on tobacco.

In fact, by law, Roth IRAs and IRAs of any description can invest in many other things, but 401 (k) s and 403 (b) s and similar employer - sponsored plans are only allowed to invest in mutual funds, because their diversification and professional management keep risk to prospective retirees like us to a minimum.

The last thing you want is to tell a potential employer you were let go because business was slow, only to have the reference claim you didn't get along with the boss.

If you're lucky enough to have a 100 % employer - funded defined benefit plan, the only thing you have to worry about is the prospect of your employer going bust — but even then, the news isn't all bad, says Brian FitzGerald, an actuary with Capital G Consulting Inc. and co-author of The Pension Puzzle.

The only thing I've asked of my (Irish) employer is that they issue me with a 1099 - MISC form in time for tax season.

But of course, safety only goes so far — although your retirement funds are safe from the troublesome things your company, employer, plan manager, brokerage or fund company may possibly do, they are not safe from your own actions.

The nice thing about an IRA is you can create this type of account with any broker or investment firm and are not limited to the employer only sponsored plan options.

In fact, student loan repayment assistance benefits are only one in a series of things that employers could be doing if they want to ensure that their staff can adequately deal with the challenges of repaying their large loans.

«We want to be an employer of choice,» Wright - Manning adds, «so things like the award, they only serve as markers for us to say: «look, we are an awesome company, come and work for us».»

Bricks aren't the only thing the manufacturer supplies, however — as the largest employer in rural Wewoka, Oklahoma, they are also a key source of jobs for hundreds of local families.

Another thing, this is my super crazy radical idea that not only should firms and legal employers provide maternity leaves but paternity leaves.

In the former, the Labour Relations Act seeks to prevent the loss of bargaining rights where an employer tries to shut down a certified business only to open up a new business doing the same thing, but without adhering to the collective agreement.

In the FCA's view, the remedies available to adjudicators to reinstate employees and / or to order employers «to do any other like thing that it is equitable to require the employer to do in order to remedy or counteract any consequence of the dismissal» are over and above the old remedies available at common law, but do not support the theory that dismissals can only be with cause.

Your CV is the only thing a potential employer knows about you.

I know that potential employers search on your FB and other sites before hiring you, but I keep my FB private and try to only keep clean things on it for that reason.

An eye - tracking study conducted by TheLadders found that hiring leaders only look at a given job application for six seconds, and that means one thing — your resume format needs to make it quick and easy for employers to find the information that counts.

Not only is this the courteous thing to do, but it will also remind them that they can expect a call in the near future from your prospective employer.

At this moment in time, no one cares what you want — the only thing that matters is the value - pack you bring to the employer.

If you're using Facebook to interact with potential employers, ensure they only see things that fit your professional image.

about.me is a tool that helps you to do exactly that by, among other things, allowing you to offer prospective employers an interactive online experience when reviewing your job candidacy: Gives life to your application and resume without the need to fit all the reasons someone should hire you within a defined word or page limit Enables human resources professionals, recruiters, and others involved in the hiring decision the opportunity to assess not only who you are but also evaluate your creativity, attention to detail, and even work product such as writing samples (e.g., blogs or articles) Personalizes your resume / application by putting a face to a name and by presenting the narrative you want them to read.

Not only will you learn some new things, but you'll also show your ambition when submitting your resume to potential employers.

Your potential employer is really only curious about a few things... your job history, name, current position held and education.

When reviewing resumes, employers are only looking for one thing: whether the applicant is qualified to perform the functions of the open position.

For another thing, you can only have one LinkedIn profile, but you can (and should) have several resumes, customized for each of the employers you're targeting.

In most cases, the only thing you truly owe an employer is two weeks notice before leaving.

Your experiences in the field of marketing and your knowledge areas relevant and related to the industry are only two of the things that should be found by your prospective employer in your resume.

Family and friends do not hold much weight for employers since they are likely to only say positive things and aren't aware of your abilities in a work environment.

Although a resume and cover letter may include similar things, your cover letter is more personal and is a way not only to show the employer that you understand the organization but a way to show them that you also have the knowledge and skills to be successful when hired on as part of the team.

By telling this the employer will not only know how to have a knack of appreciating things of your previous organizations and employers but also will give a notion about how keen and aware you are about what you do.

The fist thing to know while building reporters resume is that many employers view your resume only for a 30 seconds, so make your resume precise, readable, clean and complete.

The most important thing one has to know is that professional references have to be included only if they are required by the employer.

Remember at the back of your mind that your resume at the end has to do only one thing, convince employer that you are an applicant worth to be interviewed for the opening.

«Give something from your background that demonstrates that (you) have attributes consistent with vigor and energy and creativity and initiative and insight — all those things that some employers think only younger workers have — that counters the stereotypes.»

The only thing you have to know is that employers aren't interested in what you sold and how often you did it.

For those seeking an executive position, it is important to not only list experience, but employers are going to want to know other things such as problem solving skills, hiring / firing skills, management style and education.

But this isn't the only thing potential employers want to see on your resume.

This shows two things: firstly, that you're suitable for the position, but secondly and equally importantly, that you can analyze employer needs and use your experience to showcase relevant qualities only.

«It's never a good idea to bash your old employer or throw your former boss under the bus because it just makes you look petty... Employers are looking for versatile and adaptive employees, so harping on the bad things at your prior company will only make you look like a Debbie Downer,» says Wendi Weiner, resume writer and career transition coach.