Sentences with phrase «only transfer the money»

If those two are only transfer money spent fine by mine.
If transferring money electronically, only transfer money to the product provider.

Not exact matches

That way, even if something does happen, your credit card credentials get leaked and you lose all the money on the card, you'll only lose what you transferred — you won't give the criminal access to your primary fund, and that's your safety net.
Laws regulating MLM typically 1) require that MLM companies explicitly permit their agents to cancel their agreements and to agree to repurchase inventories at not less than 90 percent of the original transfer price; 2) prohibit inducements under which the agent is told that he or she will earn a specific amount of money; 3) prohibit the purchase of a minimum inventory; and 4) prohibit operations under which agents are only paid for recruiting others.
Forde explains how money transfer is only one use of Bitcoin and the blockchain.
«In contrast, savings accounts typically only allow the account holder to take money out by electronic transfer, visiting the bank or using the bank's local ATM,» she added.
But perhaps our favorite story came from one buyer to whom bitcoin not only gave back time — the bitcoin payment cleared in one hour instead of the several days for a traditional bank transfer — but also enough money to buy a new sportscar.
these past 2 paychecks I think ive only spent once or twice (shopping) and it was for necessities, groceries, personal items etc. im seeing how much Im having to transfer over and seeing how low my balance gets on that holding account makes me nervous, also I know that there is no «EXTRA» money in there to just swipe my card or get cash out with!!!
BinaryTilt takes the safety of their clients» money very seriously which is why they strive to provide their traders with only trusted and safe methods for transferring funds online.
Also, the advantage of anonymity in PayPal would end soon and only users who are verified with the platform via credit card, bank account, or have an SSN link will be able to transfer money to other people.
You may have more ways to access your funds from a money market account (for example, through checks), while you may only have access to your savings account via an electronic transfer or ATM / debit card.
It gives you control over your money because you are the only one who is authorized to transfer from your wallet to another wallet.
A Dutch service where you can use iDEAL to make your payment offers more reliability and security than a foreign exchange where you can only deposit money through (international) bank transfers.
We have made our best efforts to ensure that we recommend only the best international money transfer services out there, both online and offline.
I thought it was noticeable that only 22 % of the Citigate survey panel thought there would be a dramatic increase in the use of digital currencies as payment or money transfer methods over the next five years.
Often, simple money transfer capabilities solve the challenges these business owners face when they're only able to move money physically, Wilhelm says.
On cryptocurrency exchanges you can buy Bitcoin only with other cryptocurrencies or fiat money through a wire transfer or a debit card.
It's fairly simple to find options that not only pay better interest rates than money market accounts, but offer more flexible access to your money through debit cards and electronic transfers.
3 Inflation in the current market - pogba - # 70000000 sterling - # 50000000 benteke - 32500000 these prices make ozil look like a bargain and finally after spending an excess of # 90000000 in the last two transfer windows he might be feeling that he has wasted so much money only to end up with nothing just a mere mickey mouse cup.
Arsenal aren't the biggest spenders so perhaps won't go higher than # 70m, but in truth Madrid should perhaps take the money and run for an injury - prone player low on confidence whose time at the club is surely up and whose value may only continue to tumble down in coming transfer windows.
Arsenal fans were quick to get on Wenger's case after the defeat and urged the 64 - year - old to spend some money in the transfer market, having only added Petr Cech to his squad this summer.
If your answer is YES, then the only problem here is the owner who has not sack Wenger because he obviously love what the man (Wenger) is doing for him... making money like we did this summer making a profit on transfers when other clubs were spending lots of money upgrading their teams.
Not only has Arsene Wenger finally had some decent money to spend in the transfer market following the Emirates stadium debt being paid off, but our big spending rivals Chelsea and Man City have had their wings clipped a bit by the Financial Fair Play rules that UEFA brought into action in 2009.
There is a never - ending stream of Arsenal transfer rumours about all our star players that only have one year left on their contracts, including Alexis, Ozil, the Ox and many others, so I think it's a good idea to look at where the money is going as to their possible futures.
Messing around when we finally have a bit of money to spend and only getting a couple free transfers in... Ozil was needed and a must after the Suarez mess!
What you must remember, though, is that agents make a lot of money when a transfer happens, so they are only too ready to plant a rumour here and there to see what will jump out of the woodwork, like Jack going to City for example.
staying Lacazette also staying only player that could become availible is Cavani due Di Maria transfer, others are not worth mentioning and probably Wenger wont consider them, so that gives us the reason why Lord Hariss said we have 200m, he was justifing Wenger, we have money but we cant sign players.
It strikes me that Wenger is obsessed with finding and developing another Tierry Henry so that he can sit back and bask in the glory of such a find, however football has changed and the method and talent aquisition skills he introduced are mainly the reason for this, the only thing that really talks in the transfer market now is money and Wenger just WONT spend.
I think only barca real or Bayern can tempt those players away from leicester, they would give at least a year to the club, but season after that they will move onto other club depending on their form next season.As for arsenal transfer i wouldn't want to listen to rumours as most of the times these rumours are just utter garbage.i want a certain rumour about Wolfsburg signing giroud to be true.Anyways if our idiotic manager has some sense left in him after an embarrassing season he should get a premium striker which the club needed for past 4 years.He need to put his ego aside and his old philosophy of waiting for players to develop.We need already established players in every department of our team.Penny pinching has cost us just pay the damn money get the players.I get the feeling next season is going to be harder and we have less chance of winning cause man city have had 2 seasons without premier league and guardiola is gonna bring more quality and hunger to that team.
Problem is he is also under third party ownership and Sporting is asking for silly money (as they only get a fraction of the transfer fee)-- over 30M for a highly potential but unproven in big league youngster Is anyone excited that we are getting Rabiot from Paris SG.
As well as the fans the English media can be brutal, especially with that sort of money and will expect you to hit the ground running, and more often than not we've witnessed the next big sensation command a hefty transfer fee only for him not to adjust to the rigours of the Premier league and their confidence to be damaged irreparably (exhibit A Lazar Markovic — or Falcao).
The only way that the news of the latest strong financial position that Arsenal Football Club find themselves in, for us fans at least, is if the Arsenal board decide to get really serious about spending money in the summer transfer window.
So Arsenal fans will be expecting that the boss not only spends some decent money in the transfer market, but that he does it on a defender and a defensive midfielder.
So to re-cap, if AFC change the board, get new ownership, change the business model, change the manager (or give him an updated training manual), reduce the ticket prices, don't sell any players who want to leave, only buy or sell players sanctioned by the fans, spend # 65 - 85M this window, stop negotiating on transfer fees but just hand over the money then we will win the PL and UCL on a regular basis and this particular supporter will be happy.
I read that Arsenal will only have # 100mil to spend unless they make sales and that money will be put towards more transfers.
All of Wenger's disastrous plans when it comes to transfers, both incoming and outgoing, are coming home to roost... why would anyone pay a significant fee for a player that was hardly used, is overpaid and has a spotty injury record; not to mention the fact that Wenger nickels & dimes everyone when it comes to transfers so it only makes sense that other teams would do likewise when dealing with us... the fact is I wouldn't be surprised if Wenger does this so that players won't be moved thereby giving him a ready - made excuse not to spend more money on transfers; there's a reason why the latest headlines regarding Arsenal transfers seem to suggest that we aren't bringing anyone in until some players are sold or moved elsewhere on loan... we know this club knows how to utilize press coverage to further their questionable agendas, it's the very reason why the Sanchez situation has become such a nightmare
To give Wenger his due he dealt with the disappointment of this blow to his Arsenal transfer plans very well and not only wished the Leicester forward good luck for the future but actually insisted that the decision to stick with the club that took him from non-league football and gave him the chance to make the most of his talent was worthy of great respect in this modern money driven era of the beautiful game.
Arsenal will continue to buy talented kids for the academy Wenger will never buy more than ONE big money transfer per year, and then only if it is a bargain If Wenger keeps us in the Top Four he will never be sacked
Arsene Wenger is the greatest at saving money we only buy new players if they cost less than two quid Arsene plays all the am's way out on the left wing because he has a socialist pay scale but pays himself 8 blo #dy mill May the fourth be with Arse all and the home of the free (transfer)
wenger has made the club profit this window i would have though as well all incomings have been covered out goings and other revenues coming in like c / l monies and squad releases wages being saved i bet we are in a + balance if we went through it properly we do nt know what the budget is so it could be worst there now way wenger has spend # 100 not even # 70 million transfers ospina = covered by the sales of miquel and monies made from cesc to chelsea so nothing really spend there debuchy = covered by the vela money chambers = covered by the vermalen sale # 11 million only goes up to # 16 if he does well in certain circumstances sanchez = covered by the c / l monies and no doubt what we are owed on previous player sales i.e cesc to barca and song monies still outstanding welbeck = covered by wages being freed up and the rest of outgoing transactions and previous player sales being owed so there we have most likely recoup most if not all of our transfer monies back and shafted and lied to puma and the emirates about spending there monies in sponsorship on tranfers and pocketing in» profit» aprox # 60 - 70 million of the transfer funds to boot wenger hang your head in shame
Somebody please tell our lovely prof that the game is up, that Anelka would not go for 500k in this current market, that when you spend money to strengthen a key position this season, you won't have to worry about it next season and only then can we ignore the transfer window.
so again I ask where the FACK is the money from the BT sports deal that has been feted as being the biggest deal for sports broadcasting ever??? I don not and CAN NOT believe that our running costs each season leave us with only around 35 to 40 million to spend on transfers each year??
The only way Wenger is going to spend on 3 quality players the team desperately needs right now, in next 10 days without worrying about His money, is if FIFA somehow bans the the club for next 2 no make it 3 transfer windows!
I hope I'm wrong but this could be the most damaging win when it comes to transfers... winning 1 game, after about 20 minutes of really good play, is of little consequence in the grand scheme of things... only those with the most selfish of intentions would suggest otherwise... the only reason we're even in this predicament, where were celebrating our first victory of 2018 against a bottom half squad who is managed by possibly the only individual more antiquated than our manager, is because of Wenger's ridiculous mishandling of his contract last year combined with his mishandling of the contracts of our top players this year; a fact that he himself admitted to... so before you get too excited about the possibilities of our current roster don't forget what has happened over the last several years and pray to the gods of football that real quality reinforcements like Auba are on the way, which could have happened years ago for less money and we might have been holding a trophy of some significance, or this brief respite will be followed by the usual mediocrity and stagnation
No surprise, typical amateur arsenal fans, getting their hopes up thinking wenger will finally spend some money, only to realise once the transfer window shuts that we were never in for anyone, just rumours created by the wenger team to keep fans» emotions in check and prevent unrest.When will people learn, Fool me once, you are the fool, fool me twice and am the fool
I can bet my money on us challenging for top four only and this tells me we are in four a ludicrous transfer market.
i think that the current policy is to increase cash reserves, so there is only the money available from the current year to spend on player transfers.
at arsenal we should have a set rule that all players that need replacing, i.e sangna r / b = bellerin not # 12 on debuchy (then we could have kept vermalen for 1 year and afforded chambers also) should be replaced by academy players only and the transfer money should only be used to make «additions only».
We did better transfer business last summer and spent more money with the only real flop being Xhaka.
Only an IDIOT will say Wenger is solely responsible for the transfers and he can get to spend all of his boss's money if he wants...
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z