Not exact matches
For the
true claims of Jews and Christians are based on the
doctrine of revelation, which means that they are essentially the recipients of a message about the world, one given to them from the
only source who can see the world from the perspective of transcendence — sub specie divinitatis.
The factors of chief importance in the development of this theology were: (a) the Old Testament — and Judaism --(b) the tradition of religious thought in the Hellenistic world, (c) the earliest Christian experience of Christ and conviction about his person, mission, and nature — this soon became the tradition of the faith or the «
true doctrine» — and (d) the living, continuous, ongoing experience of Christ —
only in theory to be distinguished from the preceding — in worship, in preaching, in teaching, in open proclamation and confession, as the manifestation of the present Spiritual Christ within his church.
For him this
doctrine is not
only the fundamental discriminator whereby one discerns the «
true Christian» but also the universal teaching of the Christian church — at least prior to the rise of biblical criticism.
True development of doctrine can only be made on the basis of a faithful continuity of principle with what has already been defined, just as true theology can only be done in the spirit of loyal service of the magister
True development of
doctrine can
only be made on the basis of a faithful continuity of principle with what has already been defined, just as
true theology can only be done in the spirit of loyal service of the magister
true theology can
only be done in the spirit of loyal service of the magisterium.
This reality makes us aware that every narrow definition of Christian doctrinal certainty will finally have to be abandoned; every claim by any branch of the Christian church to be the
true church or the
only church will ultimately have to be sacrificed; every
doctrine of infallibility — whether of the papacy, or of the Scriptures, or of any sacred tradition, or of any individual experience — will inevitably have to be forgotten.
We must expect today, when we all know that a new era has begun in the history of human civilisation, that if the religion of Christ is
true, and is founded upon the
only claim which makes Christianity the hope of mankind - upon the Divinity personal and unambiguous of Jesus Christ - that we will find within the bosom of the Church's
doctrine all that we need to fire the world anew, and to restore all things in Christ.
I am convinced not
only that this is
true, but also that our attempts at stating an acceptable
doctrine of Christ have often failed largely because we have lost sight of this primacy.
In fact we would argue that
true development of
doctrine, including the social teaching of the Church, is
only possible on the basis of the orthodox doctrinal and spiritual principles.
In place of the
doctrine that
only an ordained priest could perform a sacrament and in particular effect the «miracle» of transubstantiation, Luther said that every baptised Christian was a
true priest.
The reality of past events is partially preserved as newly synthesized elements in later events but fully and infallibly in the never - failing memory of God.51 Hartshorne explains further that a denial of the full reality of the past would entail the conclusion that no
true statements could be made about the determinate character of past events («Lincoln was assassinated»), whereas acceptance of his
doctrine of the nonactuality of the future entails the falsity of all statements that ascribe completely determinate character to future events.52 «Maybe» is the
only correct mode of reference to the future.
true believer = loyalist to the christian
doctrine and to the christian church who's
only interest is in the preservation of the religious hierarchy.
While there is a
doctrine which holds there is no fraud when a party should have known the alleged misrepresentation wasn't
true, the court found that this
only applies if the party either received the information correcting the misrepresentation and ignored it or had some other indication that to not trust the statement.