Missionary position is
the only true position.
The position of the agnostic is
the only true position.
Not exact matches
But that $ 2 billion in long
positions only partly tells the story, because in
true hedge - fund style, Weschler shorts stocks (
positions that do not have to be reported in 13Fs) and also borrows money to leverage the fund's capital.
In order for VOW operators to be in the
position to offer the kind of Commission savings, that have been promoted by the Competition Bureau within their pleadings — and why would they want to unless it was absolutely necessary — would it also not hold
true that in a industry such as organized real estate that is grossly oversaturated with members that VOW's would not
only have to hurt some existing competitors, but would need to accomplish this to an extent where the figurative wall will rise up and thus represent a literal «barrier to entrance» into the real estate industry?
It captures the way I feel when a church (in an effort to hold onto
only «
true» Christians) doubles down on their theological
positions and shows others the door.
The claim above that
only the FLDS group has taken such a
position is not
true.
Actually Saraswati, you abandoned your original
position that America is a «two party system which
only legislation is likely to change» and supported everything I said, which is that legislation is not required, and the number of parties is not designed into the system, and it's not likely to happen because people here prefer to abandon their
true beliefs in favor of a lesser evil that might win.
I fully understand your vehemence to my
position but my
only real philosophical goal in this life is to believe what is
true.
This is, however,
only true of his book and of the
position he there advocates.
While it is
true that none of the Apostles needed a formal education for their
position, we can not say they were not educated by Jesus and others; even Paul not
only was educated in the worldly and in religious sense, but he taught «school» every day for two years in Ephesus after being rejected by the synagogue.
True religion, Roman Catholicism, is reasonable, it is rational and in fact it is the
only reasonable
position to take.
In college, I was assured that
only the first option was biblical, and that universalists themselves were most likely destined to hell along with the Buddhists, and Muslims, and Hindus, as their
position was far too unorthodox to make them «
true believers.»
Only in the future where being is firmly possessed can there be a
true assertion, an assertion in the indicative mood.18 Because the future has the indicative statement, it is in a
position to judge the truth of the present, and not the other way around, as the linguistic analysts seem to have presupposed.
Only then shall we be in a
position to judge whether or not it is
true.
For Whitehead explicitly states in the
only review of another's book he ever made: «I think that the formalist
position adopted in that chapter [Introduction to Universal Algebra], whilst it has the merit of recognizing an important problem, does not give the
true solution...» (SPTC5: 239).
Since this is the case, it should not be surprising that men generally tend to absolutize their own
position as the
only true one, or at least as the one superior to all others.
Granted that psychicalism as a metaphysical
position does indeed imply that at least some psychical concepts are truly analogical in their application to God, it is just as clear that psychicalism itself can be established as
true only if at least some psychical terms are known to express theological analogies.
If any of our psychical concepts really is a
true analogy, in that it applies primarily to God and
only secondarily to ourselves, at least with respect to what is meant by it, if not with respect to how it means, we, at any rate, neither are nor ever could be in the
position of knowing it to be so.
It's
true, for me, that speaking and writing helps me not
only articulate my own
position but understand it better.
For 14 percent of all voters abortion was a priority; that was
true for 17 percent of Bush voters and
only 12 percent of Gore voters, indicating once again that a pro-life
position is an election plus.
One thing we can all agree on is: no matter what the
position — Jesus did allow choice as this was the
ONLY true way to Him and the Kingdom of God.
Very
true, playing Ramsey on the wing is an obvious sign that hes gone back 2 playing people ou of
position to accommodate certain players.Playing Rambo on the wing is
only a syptom of the real problem, which is Wenger himself
He started 14 games as a
true freshman after learning not
only to play CB in Nick Saban's extensive, pattern - matching playbook, but also the more complicated nickel
position.
GK seems the
only position that mught be
true.
This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self,
only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of
position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying
position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide
positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have
only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one
true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of
position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so
only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back
position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits
Without a
true post on the team 6 - 8 Tydus Verhoeven of Manteca had to play the
position and he gave Wilson a tussle and blocked two of his shots and four overall, but being out of his normal
position limited his offensive touches and he
only had eight point with seven rebounds although he was 4 - of - 5 from the field.
ozil's form will
only get worse if wenger continues to play him out of
position, it's sad but
true.
I will say it again Coquelin is the
only true DM arsenal has, Chambers can be converted into a DM also, which i feel would be his most suited
position, Xhaka is not really a DM but more a deep lying playmaker with some defensive qualities, cazorla also has that trait, Ramsay, Iwobi and wilshere are actually want to be number 10s, who are considered box to box midfielders but both lack the defensive discilpline, Elneny is our
only box to box midfielder who is very disciplined and Ozil our number 10 who although provides a lot of assist does not provide a goal treat.
Underwhelming signing if
true but I would feel relieved... but that's
only because this means we have a striker
position covered with enough money to splash on defending
positions.
Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better
position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a
position - by -
position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have
only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the
only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that
position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are
only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some
true quality at the striker
position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could
only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've
only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that
only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...
OX and Gnarby are the
only two i think can reach the Hazard level and surpass it, once they remain fit and injury free, wilshere is a different style of player, with a different set of skills, i think his
true position is right behind the striker, but that area is fast becoming congested.
This success clearly went to his arrogant, way past it head and he has failed every time since, when trying to convert players and
only succeeded in playing then out of their natural comfort zone and
true position, thus demoralising and regressing them as players.
Personal feelings about Rooney and his woeful form aside, the
only way for the skipper to get back to any kind of
true form is by getting minutes on the field, improving his fitness and being in
position to put chances away when given the opportunity to do so.
The long answer is that, it is
true that the National Operating Committee on Standards for Athletic Equipment (NOCSAE) initially decided in July 2013 that modification of helmets with third - party after - market add - ons, such as impact sensors installed inside a helmet or to its exterior, would be viewed as voiding the helmet manufacturer's certification, and that the certification could
only be regained if the helmet was retested by the manufacturer with the add - on, NOCSAE later issued a press release clarifying that
position: Instead of automatically voiding the certification, NOCSAE decided it would leave it up to helmet manufacturers to decide whether a particular third - party add - on affixed to the helmet, such as a impact sensor, voided its certification of compliance with NOCSAE's standard, and now allows companies which make add - on products for football helmets to make their own certification of compliance with the NOCSAE standards on a helmet model, as long as the certification is done according to NOCSAE standards, and as long as the manufacturer assumes responsibility (in other words, potential legal liability) for the helmet / add - on combination.
True torticollis is present when not
only does your baby keep their head in the same
position, but they can't move their head out of it and you can't stretch it there either.
Things are circulated there as truth — «You
only have one
position you can labor in at the hospital,» «You can't make noise at the hospital,» «At the hospital they'll try to force drugs on you that will hurt your baby» — that aren't
true, and so many women who choose home birth think they are making a choice that will give them more «control,» when really they'd have all those same options at the hospital (multiple labor
positions, noise or no noise, no drugs if they want) and MORE.
This doesn't mention proper
positioning, doesn't talk about most carriers (
only mentions 3 types, and doesn't even give you
true information), and leaves out important safety info (while giving you irrelevant info meant to scare).
The consensus is that not
only is Cuomo returning to his liberal roots after two years of austerity proposals, but he's
positioning himself as a
true - blue Democrat should he run for president in 2016.
According to the Greens, the broadcast
positions them as «the
only true alternative to the establishment parties, who offer more of the same childish Punch and Judy politics».
«And so when I heard that Edward Mahama had gone to accept the
position, I said it was not
true because Edward Mahama will resort to the party before he can take such a decision
only for me to wake up this morning for media houses to be playing his voice saying that he has confirmed.
Apologies, the
true position was set out by Sir George Young earlier: «Although all hon. Members will be entitled to vote in the ballot for each Chair,
only members of the party specified in the motion will be eligible to stand as candidates for that post.»
«This is typically
only true in mid-career to more experienced
positions,» he says.
And it's
true that although women hold roughly 34 % of all faculty
positions now (up from 23 % in 1975), they have managed to capture
only 19 % of the full professorships (up from 10 %).
At the very least, this seems like another report supporting the
position that a
true rejuvenation treatement must be comprehensive (i.e. the SENS approach, which Michael reiterated here); using a single type of treatmen will
only delay or stabilise.
Since few results on anything represent the absolute «truth» and few real scientists would say «
only these results are the 100 %
true ones» I suspect that everyone in any
position of responsibility has to be selective to a certain degree in deciding which results to base policy on.
however, the reverse is not
true if you have the strength to do a high kick you must also have the flexibility to do it as you could have
only built the strength by being in that extreme
position.
In addition to driving higher usage than Wi - Fi -
only tablets, cellular - enabled tablets also help
position the segment as
true mobile solutions rather than stay - at - home devices.»
Finding our «Monkey Rock» Winery and Vineyard that also boasts a wonderful
position, magnificent views and that
only 10 minutes from Denmark is almost too good to be
true!
There is a wide variety of honest skeptics in the middle ranges, and that, so long as they are
true skeptics (and
only they know if they are or not), they all have the characteristic of
only provisionally accepting their
position, and therefore are still honestly open to new data that might alter their
position, and in fact, seek it out.
BTW there is no 178.8 year cycle, the cycle
only holds
true for the last few hundred years, but there is a 4628 year cycle where the outer planets return very closely to their original
positions.