India and China are the only countries with nuclear weapons and an official «No First Use» policy in place that states they will
only use their nuclear weapons as a retaliatory action.
Not exact matches
Only the ingnorant would encourage the
use of
nuclear weapons.
Remember Martin, we are still the
only country to ever
use a
nuclear weapon not once but I do believe twice.
Behind this statement is a conviction that nor
only the
use but also the development and manufacture of
nuclear weapons is contrary to the gospel of Jesus Christ.
Not
only did they become the first and
only nation to
use nuclear weapons against another, they did it twice.
Eighty - one per cent would like to see a step - up in arms - control negotiations with the Soviets, though
only 46 per cent regard the
use of
nuclear weapons as «always morally wrong.»
The army and navy in all honesty we did not know he held a 3rd dan black belt in sho rea, he had been trained in air born and air assault and
nuclear weapons and their security on trident submarines so when somebody attacked him or
use a
weapon to intimidate him he considered
only one option, deadly force had just been authorized.
Here it's important to note that Russia always had the view that there was no evidence that Iran's
nuclear program was
used for a
weapons program so there were no legal grounds for adopting a chapter 7 UNSC resolution for which the requirement is not
only that there must be a problem but that this problem must put international peace and security at risk.
After all, they are the
only nation to
use a
nuclear weapon in war.
Up until recently Israel was the
only country with
nuclear weapons, and they have
only ever
used them passively, such as when they coerced the U.S. to intervene diplomatically in 1973.
Indeed every other country which possesses
nuclear weapons use exactly the same argument (deterrence) to maintain their right to possesses
nuclear weapons, so why is
only North Korea criticized?.
Proponents of a ban argue that, not
only would the
use of
nuclear weapons contravene the spirit of the general principles of the laws of war, the humanitarian and environmental consequences of
nuclear war would not be contained by national borders.
Korea likely sees us for the hypocrites we are, thus, doesn't want to be told by the
only people in the history of the world to ever
use nuclear weapons, what to do with theirs.
Having
nuclear weapons doesn't mean that you should
use them, having them
only means that rational states most likely won't
use them against you.
«That the Parliament looks critically at the results of a new poll on support for
nuclear weapons in Scotland commissioned by Lord Ashcroft; believes that the result stating that 51 % of Scots want the Trident nuclear deterrent to be replaced is misguidedly being used to suggest that a majority of Scots support keeping nuclear weapons in Scotland; understands that the results of this poll were intended to challenge the findings of a recent poll commissioned by the Scottish Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament that showed a decisive 75 % majority of the Scottish public is against both the cost and the reasoning behind the UK Government's intention to keep all of its nuclear weapons stationed in Scotland; understands that, while Lord Ashcroft conducted the poll to supposedly show that «more than half of Scots are in favour of nuclear weapons», the poll showed that only 37 % of Scots believe so in principle, compared with 48 % who do not; questions the integrity of a poll that, it understands, was privately paid for by a wealthy Tory backer; considers that Lord Ashcroft is spinning the results, and believes that he should stop doing so and accept what it considers the fact proven time and again that Scots want rid of nuclear weapons.
nuclear weapons in Scotland commissioned by Lord Ashcroft; believes that the result stating that 51 % of Scots want the Trident
nuclear deterrent to be replaced is misguidedly being used to suggest that a majority of Scots support keeping nuclear weapons in Scotland; understands that the results of this poll were intended to challenge the findings of a recent poll commissioned by the Scottish Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament that showed a decisive 75 % majority of the Scottish public is against both the cost and the reasoning behind the UK Government's intention to keep all of its nuclear weapons stationed in Scotland; understands that, while Lord Ashcroft conducted the poll to supposedly show that «more than half of Scots are in favour of nuclear weapons», the poll showed that only 37 % of Scots believe so in principle, compared with 48 % who do not; questions the integrity of a poll that, it understands, was privately paid for by a wealthy Tory backer; considers that Lord Ashcroft is spinning the results, and believes that he should stop doing so and accept what it considers the fact proven time and again that Scots want rid of nuclear weapons.
nuclear deterrent to be replaced is misguidedly being
used to suggest that a majority of Scots support keeping
nuclear weapons in Scotland; understands that the results of this poll were intended to challenge the findings of a recent poll commissioned by the Scottish Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament that showed a decisive 75 % majority of the Scottish public is against both the cost and the reasoning behind the UK Government's intention to keep all of its nuclear weapons stationed in Scotland; understands that, while Lord Ashcroft conducted the poll to supposedly show that «more than half of Scots are in favour of nuclear weapons», the poll showed that only 37 % of Scots believe so in principle, compared with 48 % who do not; questions the integrity of a poll that, it understands, was privately paid for by a wealthy Tory backer; considers that Lord Ashcroft is spinning the results, and believes that he should stop doing so and accept what it considers the fact proven time and again that Scots want rid of nuclear weapons.
nuclear weapons in Scotland; understands that the results of this poll were intended to challenge the findings of a recent poll commissioned by the Scottish Campaign for
Nuclear Disarmament that showed a decisive 75 % majority of the Scottish public is against both the cost and the reasoning behind the UK Government's intention to keep all of its nuclear weapons stationed in Scotland; understands that, while Lord Ashcroft conducted the poll to supposedly show that «more than half of Scots are in favour of nuclear weapons», the poll showed that only 37 % of Scots believe so in principle, compared with 48 % who do not; questions the integrity of a poll that, it understands, was privately paid for by a wealthy Tory backer; considers that Lord Ashcroft is spinning the results, and believes that he should stop doing so and accept what it considers the fact proven time and again that Scots want rid of nuclear weapons.
Nuclear Disarmament that showed a decisive 75 % majority of the Scottish public is against both the cost and the reasoning behind the UK Government's intention to keep all of its
nuclear weapons stationed in Scotland; understands that, while Lord Ashcroft conducted the poll to supposedly show that «more than half of Scots are in favour of nuclear weapons», the poll showed that only 37 % of Scots believe so in principle, compared with 48 % who do not; questions the integrity of a poll that, it understands, was privately paid for by a wealthy Tory backer; considers that Lord Ashcroft is spinning the results, and believes that he should stop doing so and accept what it considers the fact proven time and again that Scots want rid of nuclear weapons.
nuclear weapons stationed in Scotland; understands that, while Lord Ashcroft conducted the poll to supposedly show that «more than half of Scots are in favour of
nuclear weapons», the poll showed that only 37 % of Scots believe so in principle, compared with 48 % who do not; questions the integrity of a poll that, it understands, was privately paid for by a wealthy Tory backer; considers that Lord Ashcroft is spinning the results, and believes that he should stop doing so and accept what it considers the fact proven time and again that Scots want rid of nuclear weapons.
nuclear weapons», the poll showed that
only 37 % of Scots believe so in principle, compared with 48 % who do not; questions the integrity of a poll that, it understands, was privately paid for by a wealthy Tory backer; considers that Lord Ashcroft is spinning the results, and believes that he should stop doing so and accept what it considers the fact proven time and again that Scots want rid of
nuclear weapons.
nuclear weapons.»
According to the Doomsday Clock timeline, the
only time we were closer to the
use of
nuclear weapons was in 1953:
Even if Britain were to come under
nuclear attack itself,
only 55 % would support
using nuclear weapons in response.
And in a chapter on the radioactive elements carried in
nuclear fallout, there's Pig 311, a sow that survived a
nuclear test blast
only to be
used as propaganda for the
weapons» supposed safety.
The former
nuclear weapons facility at Savannah River, Ga. — also part of the Manhattan Project — has been successfully vitrifying
weapons waste for years, but
only one fuel separation process was
used there.
But under the NNPA, U.S. action can be triggered
only by concerns that U.S. - origin spent fuel may be
used for
nuclear weapons production, or may be vulnerable to theft or terrorism.
Even though federal laws limit the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) to be
used only for defense transuranic (plutonium - contaminated) waste from
nuclear weapons, the Department of Energy (DOE) proposed actions to expand WIPP to three additional missions in 2012 - 2013.
While I totally agree with you on why Japan is fearful of N. Korea it should be noted that the U.S. is the
only country to date to have actually
used a
nuclear bomb as a
weapon on another country... so far.
The environmental threat from the
use of
nuclear weapons is still with us, and the
only way to prevent this from occurring is to get rid of the
weapons.
Plenty of countries are content to patronize a government that not
only brutally tramples basic human rights, degrades women and persecutes gays, but also
uses the currency it collects from oil sales to build
nuclear weapons so it can threaten... Continue Reading»
The letter states that autonomous
weapons have been describes as «the third revolution in warfare, after gunpowder and
nuclear arms» and argues it would
only be a matter of time before they fall into the hands of terrorists, dictators and warlords who may
use them for ethnic cleansing and to control their populace.
Yet, the range of scenarios potentially triggering such a first
use of
nuclear weapons by the US is indicative of a foreseeable possibility to
use force not
only in response but also in anticipation.