The only valid marriages are those which produce children.
Not exact matches
There initiative wanted to amend the law to say, «
Only marriage between a man and a woman is
valid in the District of Columbia.»
The film premiered in 2008 just before California voters were to vote on Proposition 8, the California ballot proposition stating that
only marriage between a man and a woman is
valid.
The objection that recontracting is «too legalistic» is
valid only if a couple has already achieved the kind of mutually acceptable level of fairness in the
marriage that lets their love flower fully.
Must all sacramentally
valid marriages resemble my friends», beginning
only after a few years of theological study, during a Mass set to music by Mozart?
A
marriage shall be considered
valid only if the wife is a virgin.
Fact: This is technically correct, albeit
only half the story: The
marriage was accepted as
valid but considered sinfully contracted, necessitating penance.
The
only god damn
valid comparison you made was our age limits for
marriage.
The controversial legislation, often called DOMA, defines
marriage for federal purposes as unions
only between a man and woman, and excludes same - sex unions, even those
valid under state law.
That to be
valid and recognized in this state, a
marriage shall exist
only between a man and a woman, regardless of any court decision to the contrary.
Proposition 22, which a majority of California voters supported in 2000, states that «
Only marriage between a man and a woman is
valid or recognized in California.»
These sections hold that
only marriages between a man and a woman are
valid and recognized in the state of California.
Under the Divorce Act there is
only one
valid reason for a Divorce and that is «
Marriage break down» It is necessary that at least one party prove that the marriage has broken down and can not be r
Marriage break down» It is necessary that at least one party prove that the
marriage has broken down and can not be r
marriage has broken down and can not be repaired.
Marital property in Florida is considered to be all assets and debts either spouse acquires during the
marriage, unless there is a
valid written agreement stating otherwise, regardless of whether the property or debt is
only in one spouse's name.
The argument here would be that this lack of capacity renders a
marriage voidable
only, with the upshot that it can
only be challenged by one of the parties and is
valid until successfully challenged by an annulment proceeding.
Once their
marriages are found
valid under Iowa law, common law spouses can
only end such relationships through divorce.