I shall leave you to Muffdiver forum as clearly you think yours is
the only valid opinion on anything Arsenal.
Not exact matches
There are no
valid arguments in his statement
only opinion.
I agree with Bill Maher, but then again I'm a lifelong atheist... I have never believed for one minute that the god as portrayed in the bible or koran has any possibility of being real to everyone, otherwise that god would make itself obvious and not hide behind man made lies and cultural practices that self perpetuate thanks fo fear... otherwise there would not be several thousand man made religions trying to claim that god as their own... yes, it is an
opinion,
only valid to the
opinion holder and no one else... Bill, thanks for so strongly making that point, not that it makes any difference to god fearing people... they will hold on to their
opinion as strongly as they hold on to their shotgun, thinking that each provides them with some form of security... to intelligent people, neither is secure and neither leads to true freedom of the mind...
You have made a very
valid point that he has
only had a few good games and are beng consistent in your
opinion.
The
only valid thing you've said in this exchange (or at least stood by) is that it's
opinion season.
That's the beauty and curse of the Internet; if you
only gravitate to viewpoints that confirm your own, you will never understand or gain insight into the wealth of
opinions, many that might be
valid and perhaps even open your mind.
She also laments a trend on the left and right of shouting down those who hold contrary
opinions, and criticises the media for creating a culture whereby
only certain groups of people are seen as
valid to comment on issues from feminism, Brexit or religion.
If Good e-Reader thought
only my
opinion was
valid, the editor - in - chief would close the article to comments.
Maybe they're not to you, but that seems kinda selfish and egotistical to think
only your
opinion is
valid, don't you think?
It's a perfectly
valid point and one that tears my
opinion in half; on one hand I agree that a lack of urgency to the quests made it the whole thing feel a bit stupid, but on the other hand the lack of urgency made it so much easier for the play to simply wander off and become lost in the land of Cyrodill,
only emerging years later when somebody said something about a game called Skyrim.
Yes of course but the above points are still
valid (
only in my
opinion of course).
The SMC's emphasis on «expert
opinion», reflects the «values» recently evinced by Lewandowsky, that debate about the climate and criticism of his own work is
valid only when «addressed through proper channels» — it «should take place in the scientific literature».
So it is
ONLY as an
opinion that the «greenhouse platform» can present the «greenhouse effect» and that is not making such to be
valid science «Sam», nor is «
opinion» a validation of SCIENCE and never has
opinion been such.
All
opinions are
valid,
only some come from a more informed basis, and thus have a greater likelihood of coming closer to matching up with reality.
Be that as it may, and in the rather theoretical event of a supreme court not bound to go before the ECJ under 267 TFEU — whatever the reason — and choosing to ask the ECtHR for an advisory
opinion, it is clear that the subject matter of a
valid request could
only be an issue relating to the Convention and not to EU law, as the ECtHR has no competence to interpret EU law.
In my
opinion, anyone who wants to publish anything on Slaw, whether as a post or a comment, should do so
only after he or she has provided Simon with a
valid e-mail address, a short bio and a statement of the organization with which he or she is affiliated.
If you constantly feel smarter than, better than, or more sensitive than your significant other, you're not
only less likely see his or her
opinions as
valid, but, more important, you're far less willing to try to put yourself in his or her shoes to try to see a situation from his or her perspective.
Feeling smarter than, better than, or more sensitive than your significant other means you're not
only less likely see his or her
opinions as
valid, but, more important, you're far less willing to try to put yourself in his or her shoes to try to see a situation from his or her perspective.
An expert's
opinion is
only as
valid as the reasons for the
opinion.
Carolyn, this is really a legal question and since lawyers don't post on website message boards, you won't find a
valid answer here (
only opinions).