Sentences with phrase «only via radiation»
14), addresses the mechanisms of atmospheric heat transfer not only via radiation but also by convection, which is not mentioned once in the IPCC's scientific reports (Ref.
http://www.climatescience.org.nz/ Not exact matches
To answer Hart's question: The evaporation rate of black holes via Hawking radiation is very slow, and our PBHs have a significant abundance only in a range of around one solar mass.
Fanged frogs present an even more exciting challenge, he says, because their diversification likely was influenced not only by the dynamic tectonics of Sulawesi, but also by adaptive radiation via ecological diversification.
We have successfully established modified mouse tail and hind limb lymphedema models via only surgical techniques without radiation, which have characteristics of chronic secondary lymphedema.
As far as I know, if the only physical mechanism under consideration is the radiative cooling of the planet's surface (which was heated by shortwave solar radiation and reradiated at longer wavelengths in the infrared) via radiative transport, additional gas of any kind can only result in a higher equilibrium temperature.
The only way heat can escape to space is via radiation because space is a void and therefore heat can not be transmitted by convection or conduction.
Thermal energy or heat is only transferred to solids and liquids via radiation.
If the upper troposphere cools only by radiation (with probably some convection across the tropopause), but the surface transfers energy to the upper troposphere via radiation, convection, and evapotranspiration, why would the concurrent CO2 - induced warming be uniform?
Only now heat can leave the black body via conduction and convection as well as radiation, so I don't want to say the black body reaches radiation - rate - equilibrium, rather it reaches energy - rate - equilibrium.
Energy (ie warmer water) can convect upwards all it likes but it can only leave * through the skin via evaporation or radiation which (I believe) is the limiting factor.
(For the earth system as a whole, the only way it can lose heat is via radiation, although heat can be transferred between different parts of the system, e.g., surface to atmosphere by convection and evaporation / condensation.)
Hence, the easiest way to figure out what is going to happen to the surface temperature is actually to look at the energy budget at the top of the atmosphere (where we know the only energy transfers are via radiation) and then to incorporate convection and latent heat transfer essentially through understanding the constraints that they set on the lapse rate.
... you say that most of the energy leaving the system via IR emission (from CO2 in your example) is sourced from insolation, which would mean that only a small portion of the escaping CO2 radiation energy originates from earth's IR.
BPL (84) you say that most of the energy leaving the system via IR emission (from CO2 in your example) is sourced from insolation, which would mean that only a small portion of the escaping CO2 radiation energy originates from earth's IR.
Doc, you then remind me: -LSB-[«I should add also that while convection is important within the atmosphere, the only way that Earth as a whole can lose heat is via radiation.
Radiative equilibrium implies that temperatures have reached equilibrium via exchange of radiation only.
The only part that is in question is my step 2, where, I suppose, you could conclude that all the heat tranfer is via conduction, with absolutely no radiation and therefore a blank video recording.
In terms of climate it means that the energy coming into the earth - system is not only the solar radiation that «everyone» quotes, but also via light itself in the magnetic field, as well as via the polar Birkeland currents, and much like the stellar circuit proposed by Alven as reported in Parker, E. N., 2000, Physics Today, June issue p. 28, where the earth replaces the stellar object and the currents dropped down in density to dark current mode.