Atheist Voters can
only vote based on their own personal bias.
This may seem obvious, but I'm not voting for any of the users in this tournament, I'm
only voting based on the characters and which one could legitimately beat the other in a fight.
Not exact matches
As the Financial Times (whose writer also testified) reported, a diamond - registration blockchain exec noted that the system was «garbage in, garbage out,» and a researcher designing blockchain -
based voting systems said the technology would
only be useful for recording final results, rather than validating individual
votes.
Zuckerberg said Thursday that «voters make decisions
based on their lived experience,» continuing, «Part of what I think is going on here is people are trying to understand results of the election, but I do think that there is a certain profound lack of empathy in asserting that the
only reason that some of them are
voting the way they did is because they saw some fake news.
Only a moron would
vote for or not
vote for a President
based on one issue.
How is something considered to be actual fact if it is
only based on scholarly opinion or even by scholarly majority
vote?
Apparently, we
only vote our conscience if we
vote based on what you think.
I'll bet he chooses Rubio and loses because Rubio
only represents a fraction of the Hispanic
vote, the Caribbean
based Hispanics (and maybe
only the Cuban part of that as well).
Although many outside the US are drawing conclusions about Americans
based on our presidential candidates, they might be surprised to learn that
only 14 per cent of eligible voters chose either Clinton or Trump during the primary elections, (where both parties
vote to nominate a candidate to represent them in the general election) and less than 30 per cent of eligible Americans
voted at all.
How would you like it if W h i t e voters
only voted for a person's color?I saw a talk show interview the other night.One of the top B l a c k leaders said that he
voted for Obama
based on his color and asked others to do the same.How crazy is that?
And those two things should not be the
only basis of a
vote.
Basing your
vote on who is going to over-turn Roe v. Wade, or make marriage for one man / one woman «
only» etc...
Does it follow that model citizens should leave their religious convictions at home (where they are relatively harmless), and
base their
votes and arguments concerning public questions on secular considerations
only?
You must not be paying attention to not
only how people will be
voting, but / and even more importantly the people (especially the hyper - religious) that are running for and getting
voted into office are with zealotry... attempting, and in some cases passing laws that are
based on their «religious beliefs.»
He
only agrees when it is time to get
votes from the TP
base and he is using them good.
If the members of the Southern Baptist Convention truly believe that
only those who place personal faith in Jesus Christ will be saved and that no concessions to this belief should be made on the
basis of its troubling moral implications, then for consistency's sake, they must also
vote to condemn the teaching of the age of accountability.
Still, even in Florida, Trump
only garnered 19 percent of
votes from those who chose their candidate
based on «shared values.»
In fact, it might be the
only way I can get more than the teabagger
vote and pull in anything from Obama's liberal
base.»
I will
vote only for those individuals who
base their beliefs on what is good for the greater benefit of mankind without the fear of being stricken down because I don't follow some religious teaching.
The Constitutional Court
voted 9 — 0 to reverse the regulations, saying they violated Indonesia's 1945 constitution, which simultaneously declares the country «
based upon the belief in the One and
Only God» and «guarantees all persons the freedom of worship each according to his / her own religion and belief.»
«Noting the fact that the Sexual Orientation Regulations are being
voted on in the House of Commons today,» said the Cardinal, «I again express our concern at their impact, not
only on adoption services, but on cooperation between faith -
based voluntary agencies and public authorities in public funded services....
MY DESCRIPTIONS ARE
ONLY FOR EFFECT, and you should
vote on how bad YOU feel each problem is, not
based on my description of it.
Not
only is she a woman and a strong fund - raiser, but she also represents a motivated ethnic
voting base, which could be crucial in this first - ever June primary.
Theoretically speaking, there are mechanisms that prevent someone from
voting twice (you are
only allocated to
vote to one polling place
based on your residence address, and that polling place has a name list where you sign off that you
voted).
The woman will
only get the
votes of those naive enough to think they can change the system, and those who are sexist enough to cast their
vote based on sex instead of issues.
Have you seen the size of the Conservative Majority on England There is increasingly
only one answer to this its sad but we need an English Parliament and it can
vote on the
basis its decides suits it.
Because Labour could, potentially, win if the previously Labour but now non-voters can be persuaded to start turning out and
voting Labour again, but
only if the non-
voting support
base is fairly large, and without that sort of analysis over larger areas it's hard to judge — it's definitely partially true in my ward, Labour had disappeared electorally years ago, but won the seat in 2012, despite most other parties getting similar
votes to normal (and our support mostly going to an Independent we were tacitly backing).
If the electorate are supposed to be a part of the election process surely they can
only vote on the
basis of the promises made by politicians, (or are they supposed to be psychic and see into the future?)
Voting for a candidate «no matter what» is hard to quantify but a good proxy is to compare though distinguish between «swing» voters, who might potentially
vote for either candidate, and «
base» voters, who would
only vote for one.
«But if several Democrats end up on the ballot in a general election it can
only help the incumbent Republican who will definitely get out his
base vote in what still amounts to a Republican town.»
That tally showed Perez
only 13 1/2
votes ahead of Ellison (DNC delegates
based overseas get
only half a
vote).
Based on Matt Doheny's real - world business experience, one member of the board changed his
vote to Doheny, but wanted it clarified it was
only by the slightest of margins.
most Labour voters didn't
vote on the
basis of Brexit -
only around a fifth of surveyed Labour voters named Brexit as their most important election issue
The Republicans have a problem in that without throwing a bone to their own
base upstate that regards Skelos
only a step or two behind Cuomo on the «personification of evil» scale, they risk that
base vote staying home in close races next year or, even worse, primaries against the senators who
voted for Flanagan last week.
Note that both polls are
based on
only those certain to
vote.
But the GOP benefits from an active
base, as 77 percent of Republicans state they are absolutely certain to
vote on Election Day, while
only 61 percent of Democrats say the same, a telling spread of sixteen points.
ALBANY — New Yorkers have overwhelmingly defeated a ballot question asking whether the state should hold a constitutional convention, with
only 19 percent
voting yes,
based on results from nearly half the state's election districts.
The lower rate will not do much good for Milwaukee when offered to companies moving from, for example, a neighboring county, said Milwaukee Alderman Robert Donovan, who on Wednesday
voted in favor of the plan
based only on company water use and job creation.
Labour and the Conservatives, supported by the London -
based media, have long behaved as if they were the
only players that counted, even though their share of the
vote has declined since 1974 (despite a few spikes upwards in the 1980s) and now stands roughly at 65 %.
The instant - runoff
voting for the House upsets the apple cart if and
only if one of the major parties fails to be broad -
based enough to siphon off third party policies in a given electorate (i.e. a majority party swaps places with a minority party).
12:30 - I'm woken
only by the extraordinary sycophancy of a Labour MP, whose question to Brown - loosely
based on bus services - is whether it would be wise for a person to
vote Labour «at every available opportunity».
--RRB-
Basing the number of electors on the number of Federal Representatives plus two Senators for each state prevents the dreaded one - man - one -
vote which despite the just sound of it,
only works in small, homogenous populations.
Secondly, party proportionality is
only one criterion, and there are at least three that need to be considered when judging a
voting system — the level of local representation, the
basis of the system and how open it is to individual accountability and independents, and national outcomes.
Electoral data is
based on three indices: the percentage of
votes cast for the big two (the
only parties ever to form government - let's ignore 2010 for now), turnout, and voter registration levels.
Whether Britain
votes In or Out, the gap between the Labour leadership and the party's traditional, working class
base is
only getting bigger.
Not
only does this give electors a few extra days to consider their options
based on the first result, it ensures that they are not forced into making a «saccharine» second choice (which AV would force them to do), before they know whether or not their first preference candidate will get over 50 % of the
vote.
South Australian state elections have boundaries strategically redrawn before each election with a fairness aim
based on the prior election TPP
vote, the
only state to do so.
Still, Mr. Sanders can win if the primary electorate expands from its normal, narrow
base: if new voters, young people and those who normally
only vote in a presidential general show up at the polls.
Good Piece, However i think your wrong, the liberals will pull out once the AV is defeated and allow a minority goverment to continue on a
vote by
vote basis and start the campaign to repair themselfes ahead of the next general election,
only to find themselfes in the same position again, except this time it will end up a lib — lab pact.
The
only rare exception is when there is a revolt on the government benches which is backed by the opposition, and even then when the government lost a
vote on that
basis last year on the EU budget, it still ostentatiously dismissed the
vote as merely «advisory».