Sentences with phrase «only way we talk»

I met a great guy and this is the only way we talk.

Not exact matches

«This is the only entrepreneurship book I have come across that talks honestly about the incredible challenges that entrepreneurs face when running a business, and not just about facing the difficult decisions, but about the way running a company affects you mentally.

And I think the subject that I would talk about mostly is a level of compassion and empathy that we need to try to recognize that the only way our society and the promise of America and the American dream can continue to exist is to ensure the fact that those people who were at the lower end have the same opportunity that people have with the right ZIP code in America.

With no direct sales force and no money to advertise, «it was the only cost - effective way for us to talk to our customers.»

Watch the press talk about cryptocurrencies and you might believe that there was only one digital coin and only one way to invest.

The only other candidate to even utter the phrase «income inequality» was Gov. John Kasich, who talked about changing the ways in which education dollars are allocated.

You might be scheduled for only a 30 - minute talk or panel, but you have an opportunity to squeeze way more of a return on the investment of yourtime onstage.

«One of the most effective ways we are able to add comfort and trust to the customer's experience is by constantly talking to our customers — not only before and after a purchase is made, but after the delivery is made as well,» Norman says.

The only way to make sure that your team is working together at an optimal level is to make sure that you talk both formally and informally with your team.

The only way to go in front of an audience and to present in a way that isn't simply miming is to practice again and again, pretending (if need be) that you're talking to a room full of your closest friends.

Before his talk, Berger told me over coffee that he's not so sure about the of - the - moment advertising strategies often positioned as the only way business owners — especially small - business owners — can expand their brand and engage consumers.

When we talk about productivity, we often think of ways to seclude ourselves in our bedroom or office, alone, in the dark, with only the light of our laptop to keep us illuminated.

Golf is not only a great way to spend a day networking and talking shop; it's also an investment of four to five hours of your time.

Canned audible warnings may not be the only way Google's self - driving ride will «talk» with pedestrians.

They spend all their time talking the talk, growth hacking their way to a status of credibility, only to end up with a glossy «brand» with absolutely no substance.

The only difference is that the Feds have begun to refine their talking points in such a way as not to cause a stir, as happened almost a year ago at a New America Foundation conference on cybersecurity, in which Alex Stamos, Facebook's security chief (then Yahoo's chief information security officer), went toe to toe with the admiral.

To his surprise, they talk on the phone for over an hour, and Fralic not only walks away with a comprehensive download on the industry, but a thesis on networking he's adhered to ever since: The best way to be highly influential is to be human to everyone you meet.

By the way, talking with KWFinder support team a couple of days ago, they told me that they do not rely only on Google's data, but on different sources.

Guy Smith: That's been one of my observations, because I've been in the marketing trades within side of technology and there's always this divide between sales and marketing because the salespeople, in my opinion, my humble opinion, tend to be quarterly driven and whatever the lost sale that they last had is today's emergency and I have a feeling that that's one of the ways that feature creep gets into products is the salespeople talking about the sale they just lost and if we only had that feature, and then that knocks the entire development organization off course for the features that actually serve a broader market.

Energy and Capital editor Christian DeHaemer yells at the government, discusses how student debt is getting out of hand and talks about how the government only growing and never shrinking could be a way for investors to profit from their negligence.

Professor Woo, President of the newly established Jeffrey Cheah Institute on Southeast Asia, talks about the watershed moment in the country's recent economic history and argues for a bi-partisan consensus around «an inclusive national development» plan as the only way forward.

The book is about what I believe is the only way to get rich in the stock market through three core ideas and some of the same stock market basics we talk about on the blog.

The young women in my classes only very rarely think or at least talk that way.

You're looking at it from a «disbelief» perspective talking about atheists coming onto the comments section, but that's not really the only way to look at it.

If I think of answered prayer as a message telegraphed direct to my heart, if I have no sense of the breadth of God, the ways in which God talks to me, then I have only a rudimentary sense of prayer, for, as Gadamer shows, God is talking to me all the time and I don't seem to know it.

In many ways fathers are better now than in the rest of history, but it's only recently that fathers have begun to behave in the ways you talk about.

If only I felt that this was truly the way God was, not the fire and brimestone God that the bible talks about.

To sum up, the only real Unpardonable sin is taking the mark of the beast, and from the way you talk, you make it sound like people from non-christian religions should be pestered day and night with «BELIEVE IN GOD OR BURN IN HELL!»

The shock of that realisation was tangible and he finished at that point even though he was only part way through his talk.

The sentiment behind the interview and its fallout is as clear as it is absurd: It matters not how a professing Christian loves, or how much fruit of the spirit is exhibited in his or her life; the only way to determine whether someone is a «real Christian» is to sit around a coffee table and talk about theology.

The talk asks you then, or you ask yourselves by means of the talk, whether you now live in such a way that you truthfully will only one thing.

When Jesus said «I am the only way to God», he was talking in much broader terms.

All verses like this and Matthew 5:28 (where Jesus talks about adultery in a similarly harsh manner, are meant to do is point us straight to verses of Paul's such as Romans 3:23 and Ephesians 2:8 - 9: it's the evidence Jesus provides that, no matter what, even if we never murder a single person or in any way commit adultery, we're nothing without Him... and, oh, yeah, it's the meter that shows us who we are and why we need Him, and only Him (John 14:6), to get to heaven.

The basis of your belief system appears to be that, you will go to a place of eternal fire and torture, unless you accept that 2000 years ago god sent a piece of himself to Earth in human form (Jesus) knowing in advance that this Jesus would live, be crucified, died, then come alive again, then ascend to heaven to rejoin himself, and that this was the only way that humans could be cleansed of the evil that is inherent in them because a rib woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat an apple.

In this way, theology can talk about God while its form of discourse shows that God is known only as he gives himself to be known by faith.

Jeremy since we are talking about satan casting out satan heres a question for you.Have you ever wondered why Jesus helps satan at times or at least it appears that way.Mat 8:28 - 34 Why would he do that in the case of the demonic man the demons requested that Jesus cast them them into the pigs which he allowed it seems that not only did he help satan to have his way in destroying the pigs but destroyed the livelihood of the people in that area.You could argue at least it saved one man but is it acceptable to save one life but affect the lives of many?

It's a paradox that comes from trying to describe God in objective terms — which is the only way we can talk about anything.

Agnostics (regardless of whether they lean towards being religious or irreligious) are the only ones HUMBLE enough to admit that there is NO WAY OF KNOWING ANYTHING about an invisible man in the sky whom no one has ever talked to, heard from or seen... EVER!

You seem to have highlighted particular sins as though some are worse than others all sin leads to death not just the big ones because we all are sinners.All have gone astray none are righteous.I believe the worst sin is pride idolatry is the first commandment we set ourselves as Gods.Regardless of what the sin is, our hearts are condemned by our pride.It wasnt the sin of homosexuality or sexual deviance that destroyed sodom.It was there pride and it is one of our biggest stumbling blocks in our christian walk or it certainly was for me.We look at the story of the adulterous woman and we think adultery is a terrible crime but the story is for our benefit to show that we all are sinners that Jesus does nt condemn us but came to save us.And when Jesus says go and sin no more he was not only talking to the woman but everyone else that was around judging her for her sin its a universal message that we all need to see that we all are condemned because of our sin that Jesus came to save us and that we turn from our sin and follow him.Because he is the way the truth and the life.brentnz

First, my statement of the primary way in which theology should be empirical only talked about being adequate to all the facts of experience.

This tone of interpersonal encounter, this person - to - person mode, is the only really objective way to talk about what Jesus was talking about, for it was that personal talk that he was talking, and walking.

There are four affirmations about Jesus Christ that historically have been stressed in Christian faith: (1) Jesus is truly human, bone of our bone and flesh of our flesh, living a human life under the same human conditions any one of us faces — thus Christology, statement of the significance of Jesus, must start «from below,» as many contemporary theologians are insisting; (2) Jesus is that one in whom God energizes in a supreme degree, with a decisive intensity; in traditional language he has been styled «the Incarnate Word of God»; (3) for our sake, to secure human wholeness of life as it moves onward toward fulfillment, Jesus not only lived among us but also was crucified for us — this is the point of talk about atonement wrought in and by him; (4) death was not the end for him, so it is not as if he never existed at all; in some way he triumphed over death, or was given victory over it, so that now and forever he is a reality in the life of God and effective among humankind.

Barring that much talked about Newtplosion, the only way to keep the Newtsurge from turning into a Newtsami is to keep the race from becoming, immediately, a two person contest.

But on the other hand, when in talking about sin one talks only of such sins, it is so easily forgotten that in a way it may be all right, humanly speaking, with respect to all such things up to a certain point, and yet the whole life may be sin, the well - known kind of sin: glittering vices, willfulness, which either spiritlessly or impudently continues to be or wills to be unaware in what an infinitely deeper sense a human self is morally under obligation to God with respect to every most secret wish and thought, with respect to quickness in comprehending and readiness to follow every hint of God as to what His will is for this self.

Why do you talk about only what he didn't menage to do, or what was wrong in his pontificate?Yes, I agree there were many things that could have been resolved in better way, but he was only a human and as everybody could make mistakes.To me what is important in his pontificate is that he was a first pope who «opened «the church to people, who travelled a lot, met with people, went to synagogue, did much to abolish communism.Sure, he wasn't ideal, but for me the best pope so far.

«It can't be the only way of talking about faith.»

«WE HAVE THE VICTORY» For those struggling with thoughts of unforgiveness and attacks on the mind especially deceiving thoughts and doubts these are from satan in the word they are called fiery darts we are to quench those darts by faith so we need to read the word and believe that Gods word is true.We also have the victory over these thoughts because when we accept Jesus the holy spirit dwells within us so satan does nt have authority over us he can not rule what belongs to God he can only deceive.We can not defeat the enemy in our strength we need the holy spirit when we try and overcome him in our strength we struggle especially with our thoughs and in the area of sin.If you are having evil thoughts or doubts commit your way unto the Lord and let him fight your battle.Tell the enemy he has no authority over you that you are under the covering of Jesus Christ and when you have doubts memorise verses on faith ie greater is he that is in me than he that is in the world.The holy spirit is just like Jesus talk to him be friends with him he helps us to live like Christ and gives us the power to do it.We are overcomers more than conquerers through Christ who strengthens us.brentnz

Our study has shown, in addition, that not only do the New Testament writers show some diversity in the way in which they talk about the resurrection of Jesus, but they are not all equally dependent upon the use of the idiom for the proclamation of the Christian message.

But for Alcibiades it is senseless to speak of love - in - general: the only way to talk meaningfully about love is to celebrate the particular person whom one loves, and in his case that is Socrates.

In this video, we're only talking about $ 0.50, but I sometimes look at the millions of dollars our government and our churches spend on helping the rich in various ways, and I wonder what would happens if we used that money to help the poor and the homeless.