Sentences with phrase «only whether this thing»

She must decide not only whether this thing inside her must live or die but what — or who — that thing is.

Not exact matches

Although experts have mixed opinions about whether you should check your emails first thing in the morning, Boomerang CEO and email productivity expert Alex Moore says he's found success by checking his messages only after he's completed a task.

Experts have mixed opinions on whether or not you should check your emails first thing in the morning, but Moore says he's found success by checking his messages only after he's finished a task on his to - do list.

Click Forensics helps you determine that, analyzing things like how much time visitors spend on your site (if it's only a second or so, the click likely is fake) and whether you get repeated click - throughs from specific Internet addresses.

Whether it's a new product or something as benign as a store layout, you don't have to look hard to find examples of (largely white) men at tech companies siloing themselves off to develop The Next Big Thing, only to discover a major, avoidable flaw after the fact.

Pressed by Tapper about Trump's repeated falsehoods, with the CNN anchor asking whether they distracted from what Conway said were «the many things that he says that are true that are making a difference in people's lives,» she said they served as distractions only «if they're covered.»

The only thing left was determining whether Welch, GE's (ge) acerbic chairman CEO, and Turner, cable's most enigmatic entrepreneur, could coexist and avoid getting in each other's way.

As for whether employees will hate you for a strict policy, consider this advice from George Cloutier, the founder and chief executive of American Management Services and author of Profits Aren't Everything, They're the Only Thing: «The concept that if you love your employees they'll perform is on the edge of insanity,» Cloutier told the New York Times.

If you have income from self - employment — whether from a side gig or from full - time freelancing or contracting work — filing your 2017 tax return isn't the only thing you're supposed to do by Tax Day.

whether or not that's broken link building, resource link building or simply link begging, it is the only thing where there is no exchange of import apart from the content itself

«There's only one thing that is relevant, and that is whether a U.S. investor bought in your sale.»

But all sorts of other things can have an impact on whether people complain, seemingly unrelated or only peripherally - related issues or events like Cambridge Analytica, concerns about privacy and so on.»

Twitter Video Ads Deliver Recall, Receptivity (Study) New research finds, among other things, «Twitter was the only platform where cognitive effort, or information processing, increased for video ads, on both desktop and mobile, and attention levels remained constant on Twitter whether users were watching organic or branded ad content,» adding that mobile recall was «significantly higher.»

Whether it is Al - Qaida or Economics, we can not understand either because since the 1930 the only thing we have been teaching in our schools is Keynesian Socialism.

Whether it's Google Photos silently editing and creating custom albums based on the photos you shoot, or at - a-glance notifications providing helpful updates on the weather, your commute, or other timely info, the pure Android Oreo 8.0 that you only get on Pixel devices is the closest thing we've seen to a smart OS.

The only thing people seem to care about is whether or not you're doing something with the Blockchain.

I feel I can comment on the effect of the naked pastor's blog on me, and whether pastors can and should say these things in general, but as for whether or not it beneficial for the church members of his church, surely it is only for them to say, and perhaps not online..?

If the choice between fanaticisms, whether secular or religious, is the only thing on offer, the prospects for democracy are dim and talk about civil war may not be alarmist.

A historian has no vested interest in whether or not such things are good or bad, only in judging the primary and secondary source materials to gain an understanding.

What do you think of people who act like whatever they believe is the only thing that could possibly be correct, whether they're religious or atheists?

And we are forced to witness to our conviction that not only human beings but also all things, especially all living things, are of worth both to themselves and to God regardless of whether they are of worth to human beings.

The only thing they care about is whether the church teaches eternal security or not.

The only thing that really matters is whether or not all that stuff about Jesus» death and resurrection is * true *.

Close contact with the living Spirit of the living God, whether it be by conventional religious approach or not, is the only thing that will reveal to us the lunatic topsy - turvydom of many of our current values.

If the sufferer talks to himself in private, asks himself which kind of life he leads, whether he truthfully wills only one thing: then he is not tempted to relate in detail what he himself knows best of all, he is not tempted to compare.

The talk asks you then, or you ask yourselves by means of the talk, whether you now live in such a way that you truthfully will only one thing.

We could then ask whether becoming as the fully actual is the only form of being or whether less concrete things are also forms of being.

In this way the ontological argument, by drawing out the presupposition of metaphysical understanding, indicates that the choice before us is between holding that there is a God and that «reality» makes sense in some metaphysical manner, whether or not we can ever grasp what that sense is, and holding that there is no God and that any apparent metaphysical understanding of reality can only be an illusion which does not significantly correspond to the ultimate nature of things — unless this «nihilism» be regarded as a kind of metaphysical understanding instead of its blank negation.

Besides, if you want to use NEED as the basis for determining whether anyone is ent ¡ tled to something, you're down to protecting only 5 things: food, air, water, a reasonable temperature range, and chocolate.

It doesn't matter whether the grass is blue and the sky is green, it doesn't matter if the only thing that existed in the universe was the Earth, the Sun and a giant space lizard, it doesn't matter whether the laws of nature are consistent or not, the god explanation is compatible with all of these situations.

When it comes to a job, any job, the only thing that should matter are whether or not the person being considered for the job is qualified and capable of doing the job.

The only thing that Jesus and the Emperor did not consider was that every government reform policy whether political, economic, social....

If only one can get it made manifest that all attempts at comprehending are self - contradictory, then the thing assumes the correct position, and then it becomes clear that it must be left to faith whether one will believe or not.

You and everyone one else with your closed - minded, egotistical, racist, bigoted views disgust me to no end and make me fear for the future of our great country... the only thing that gives me hope is that someday, whether it be before God or some sort of act of Karma or whatever it may be, you will be judged.

And whether that be a powerful lawyer (if you can afford one), a body or institution or ultimately, God, a «higher power» or universal poetic justice — whatever you want to call it then the only thing that can be done is leave it to that power.

By the cross not only are all earthly peoples and kingdoms reconciled to God, but peace is made with God's most formidable enemies, the heavenly powers, the things «invisible whether thrones or dominions or rulers or powers» (Col. 1:16)!

There will be no questioning as to whether I have won men (quite on the contrary, it might well be asked whether I had any notion of having by my own efforts done the least thing toward winning them); no questioning as to whether, by the talk I have gained some earthly advantage (quite on the contrary, it might well be asked whether I had any notion of having myself done the least thing toward gaining it); no questioning about what results I have produced, or whether I may have produced no results at all, or whether loss and the sport that others made of me were the only results I have produced.

The only thing under consideration is whether they are abiding.

Only when things are truly up - front will we even be able to make an informed decision about whether the ministry is something we would want to engage in.

Whether a returned prodigal or a young man who had hitherto lacked one thing only, each rejoices in the experience which has brought him to this table, as he rejoices in the fellowship he now shares.

The change of properties does not affect this qualified eternity, or does so only when the thing little by little loses its essential attributes, hence when the change of attributes, whether they be essential or unessential, brings about an essential change in the thing and thus amounts to an essential change of its character.

The talk assumes, then, that you will the Good and asks you now, what kind of life you live, whether or not you truthfully will only one thing.

The line between «deserving poor» and «undeserving poor» is very, very hard to draw, and one of the things about poverty, whether one has work or not (some jobs pay so little that the people who do them are still well within the poverty trap), is that it is depressing, and actually saps the energy and nerve and vitality in ways that people like me, who have never been out of work and never been truly poor, can only appreciate by being with and ministering to people who are genuinely and chronically poor.

If you want to be truelly free, give up those things and embrace your fellow man whether he / she is gay or not, for only then will you start to reach enlightenment.

Whether one looks at a Church of South India congregation in the «Harijan Wadi» of a village in Chittoor District of Andhra Pradesh, or at a New Life Pentecostal congregation in the suburbs of Mumbai, whether one looks at a Syrian Orthodox community in Chungom, Kottayam, or at a Mizo Presbyterian Church in Mission Veng in Aizwal, whether one looks at the worshipers at the Indian mass celebrated at the National Biblical Catechetical and Liturgical Centre in Bangalore, or at a newly set up Baptist congregation among former estate workers in the Andaman and Nicobar islands, one thing that would strike even the most impartial observer is the reality of hybridity, hybridity which manifests itself not only in things external, but very often in terms of attitudes, thought - processes and historical self - understanding within the overall identity disWhether one looks at a Church of South India congregation in the «Harijan Wadi» of a village in Chittoor District of Andhra Pradesh, or at a New Life Pentecostal congregation in the suburbs of Mumbai, whether one looks at a Syrian Orthodox community in Chungom, Kottayam, or at a Mizo Presbyterian Church in Mission Veng in Aizwal, whether one looks at the worshipers at the Indian mass celebrated at the National Biblical Catechetical and Liturgical Centre in Bangalore, or at a newly set up Baptist congregation among former estate workers in the Andaman and Nicobar islands, one thing that would strike even the most impartial observer is the reality of hybridity, hybridity which manifests itself not only in things external, but very often in terms of attitudes, thought - processes and historical self - understanding within the overall identity diswhether one looks at a Syrian Orthodox community in Chungom, Kottayam, or at a Mizo Presbyterian Church in Mission Veng in Aizwal, whether one looks at the worshipers at the Indian mass celebrated at the National Biblical Catechetical and Liturgical Centre in Bangalore, or at a newly set up Baptist congregation among former estate workers in the Andaman and Nicobar islands, one thing that would strike even the most impartial observer is the reality of hybridity, hybridity which manifests itself not only in things external, but very often in terms of attitudes, thought - processes and historical self - understanding within the overall identity diswhether one looks at the worshipers at the Indian mass celebrated at the National Biblical Catechetical and Liturgical Centre in Bangalore, or at a newly set up Baptist congregation among former estate workers in the Andaman and Nicobar islands, one thing that would strike even the most impartial observer is the reality of hybridity, hybridity which manifests itself not only in things external, but very often in terms of attitudes, thought - processes and historical self - understanding within the overall identity discourse.

Things that are real work whether or not you believe in them; placebos only work if you trick your brain in advance toward thinking they will work.

On the other hand I hold that the technical expression so many philosophers have used as though it were self - explanatory and unambiguous — «the absolute» — is viciously ambiguous and that the more nearly self - explanatory term «independent» is safer, provided one makes explicit what the entity so described is independent of, whether everything else or only some other things, and according to what principle the distinctions are made.

The only real thing that separates «Christianity» from any other religion or spiritual belief, is not whether we incorporate Easter Bunnies, goblins, ghouls, monsters, Santa, or tiny elves into our celebrations, but rather, that our faith is not found in our ability to «save» ourselves but in Christ who died for all, so that all could enter into unbroken friendship with Him.

Most fanatics... whether they are religious, political or whatever they feel the need to grasp to give them some form of identi ty and * only * that one thing are quite rare.

Only one thing can cause us great sorrow and unceasing pain, and that is whether the theme of the Church does anything more than disclose the deceitfulness of men.