Sentences with phrase «only woman teaching»

Not exact matches

Women are taught that their importance comes only through having a husband who holds the priesthood (which they have erroneously been denied) and having lots of children and not from obtaining their education as their career should «be solely in the home».

Sometimes, teaching about sexual purity instils only shame and fear in young women.

The social and moral teaching of the Church insists that just laws recognize the truth about marriage, that it is a relation that can only subsist between one man and one woman.

It is a fact that the Mormon religion teaches that women can only get into the highest level of heaven by being called from the grave by their husbands using their secret name.

Education... creationism would supplant evolution, all sciences that could possibly come in conflict with creationism would be forbidden, all children would be required to pray and be educated in fundamentalist Christianity, women teachers would not be permitted to teach males, girls only, etc..

Like me, many choose to live out what the Church has always taught about sex, namely that it is a good gift from God that is only for marriage between a woman and a man.

Gary: I think I agree with your point that «if 1 man and 1 woman was a normal teaching of Paul's» for all believers, then it follows that the text either means «this is only for the elders and higher positions» OR that the text was referring to some other situation, such as marrying a divorced woman.

What it tried to teach me when i was a kid, people of color were punished by god, women could only go to heaven if their husband invited them, there's alot to the mormon religion that has not been let out, makes one wonder.

Same goes for theologies that suggest the poor are poor because of their sins, that if only the sick had more faith or gave more money they would be healed, that the tsunami or the earthquake or the flood that devastated a community was clearly the result of God's wrath on its gay inhabitants, that we can stop rape by teaching women to cover up better, that sex before marriage makes a person «broken» and «unwanted.»

One thinks not only of the personnel that the Jesuits and other religious institutes devoted to teaching young men but also of the teaching congregations of religious women, such as the Ursulines, who educated young women in virtue and learning.

What you enemies of purity are missing is that the teaching of purity is for both men and women, and the teaching is only one part of the teaching of self - control.

Which is why I taught my son, to be respectful of the women in his life, and not to make intimate decisions or to look at women using only the «outter brain».

Scot McKnight was the first person to draw my attention to the fact that «anyone who thinks it is wrong for a woman to teach in a church can be consistent with that point of view only if they refuse to learn from women scholars» (The Blue Parakeet, p. 148).

That's because Piper and many in the fundamentalist neo-Reformed movement are working off of a perversion of the doctrine of total depravity that not only teaches that human beings are depraved — that is, that our humanity is marred by sin — but that this depravity renders the world's men, women, and children into valueless objects of god's wrath, worthy of nothing more than eternal torture, pain, violence, and abuse.

There is only one way it could not be, and that is if you decide that it teaches that nihilism is the truth, revealed here by the pointless failure of Davis's career, so that his having to obtain abortions for women he impregnated is just another absurd, annoying, and energy - sapping aspect of that, his irrational guilt instincts causing him to have to scrounge for money, and so that his learning that one of these abortions didn't occur is just another sort of misfortune, saddling him with sentiments that he will have no way to really act upon (it is unlikely the that the mother of the child wants to see him), and probably causing him to draw some kind of superstitious karmic connection between a random coincidence of having hit a cat that looks just like one he abandoned, and his driving by the town his child may be living in.

Hey Christian women, don't blame ME... I'm only stating what your bible teaches... that your basically chattel.

As Freud rightly taught, it takes only three parties — a man, a woman and a child — to create the conditions for enmity in the world, and the introduction of a fourth, as scripture tells us, raises Cain.

This creation order and its correlatives of headship and subjection appear in each passage [dealing with woman's ruling / teaching function in the church] just as they provide the one and only foundation for the role relationships in marriage.

Sara's passion for encouraging women to teach is matched only by her stubborn commitment to Christian unity.

After much study, prayer and thought I am convinced that the idea that only men are allowed to teach scripture, be a pastor, be an elder etc. etc. was a teaching that came about due to the status of women during a particular time and culture and continued because of the patriarchal system that most churches have continued to operate under.

Such prose and poetry not only represent what women wrote but also teach us an imaginative process of reconstructing women's lives, the church, and the very nature of reflection as aimed toward the future.

Here we have only One Verse that says Women are not allowed to have Authority or Teach.

If we lay aside our opinions, biases, views, mindsets... etc and honestly and objectively look at what the Bible says and teaches then we can only conclude that women are not to be pastors, preachers, or teachers over men.

They teach and believe that a woman can not ascend to the highest kingdom and meet God unless she is married to a man and that man, endowed with a «priesthood» calling is her only way to God.

Examples are teaching from the pulpit, teaching Sunday School classes, teaching at Bible conferences, Bible colleges & on the radio, TV or internet (which is by far the greatest way that Woman preachers reach not only women but other men as well).

There is nothing in the scriptures against a woman witnessing and winning souls and even discussing the scriptures with men i.e. Aquilla and Pracilla discussing and explaining scripture to Apollos but when it comes to the official gathering of believers for service when men are present only a man can teach and only he can pastor.

They taught False teachings...» god is a women, sacrifice men, force men to part take in orgies, and force some men to become eunuchs, and Only Women could have Authority in their Temple and reliwomen, sacrifice men, force men to part take in orgies, and force some men to become eunuchs, and Only Women could have Authority in their Temple and reliWomen could have Authority in their Temple and religion.

I'm wondering why you say that women should only teach women and children?

He is the holy One, and the only Savior, and Redeemer as taught in Isaiah 49:26, and in Leviticus it specifically says that a man should not lie with another man as with a woman, as plain as that, and none of this has changed, but in the last days many will.

I am reminded of Scot McKnight's observation in The Blue Parakeet that «anyone who thinks it is wrong for a woman to teach in church can be consistent with that point of view only if they refuse to read and learn from women scholars.

«I pray for them every Monday from a list that is divided in two: Those who continue to seek to be faithful to the Bible's teaching that the only right context for sexual intercourse is in a marriage between a man and a woman and those who have moved away from that view.

For instance, even though the Church teaches that only Christ should be worshiped, that Christ is God and Mary is a creature, and that Christ is the only Savior, you can still find some old Catholic women who grew up thinking that Mary is alongside Jesus, perhaps in some kind of equal partnership.

When we teach women that men can't control themselves, we communicate that abuse is not only inevitable but acceptable.

I don't think it's so much about the levites being paid for their service it's about us doing what's right toward Pastors that must feed and tend to the flock of GOD if GOD has called them.JESUS even said in luke 10:7 that the laborers are worthy of their wages.In luke 8 1 - 4 it's says even JESUS HIMSELF recieved financial support from the women who ministered to him with their possessions.Now most people today would say he should have been ashamed of taking money from those poor women but JESUS accepted their support and they was blessed for sowing onto the LORD»S work.1 Corinthains 9:1 - 15 says dint muzzle the ox while it tread out the grain was GOD talking about oxes no he was talking about those who labor in the ministry.Who goes to war at their own expense.Or who goes to war but pay for their clothes, guns, etc.No one because the goverment if that country provide these things because of the soilders service.Who plants a vineyard and don't eat from it.Who tends a flock and don't drink the milk of it.I think it's just spiritual sense to support a pastor that's teaching you the word, casting out devils, laying hands and healing is manifesting in people lived, going to hospitails, prisons, and house calls to pray for the sick and shut in, going to graduations and funnerals, praying and fasting for himself and the flock.I think a person who think a pastor shouldn't be paid for their service either don't know they need to be paid and need to be taught or they are demonic in their thinking and either hate GOD, PASTORS, AND GOD»S PEOPLE.Why do nt you hear people saying anything against the dope dealers, strip clubs, dope houses, liquor stores, etc.It's only when people give into the LORD»S work that evil minded or misinformed people have a problem with it.No sir we don't have to use the old testament to show that we should support out pastors.You don't use the law, love tells me to support the pastor.Under the new testament LOVE is the greatest of all.Love for GOD and man.If GOD asked for 10 percent under the law to support the levites who didn't have all the responsibilities of Pastor today.Church rent, gas for vans of thd church, insurance fir the church and church vehicles, feeding and clothing the poor, light, gas, and water bill, mantience on the church or vehicles, not to mention the Pastor own house, cars, children, insurance, etc.If would be foolish for one to think that a pastor should take care if his house and GODS HOUSE without people supporting the work of the KINGDOM OF GOD.If we love GOD we are going to support HIS KINGDOM and HIS PASTOR.If under the law GOD asked for 10 percent how much should we give under the LOVE COVENANT?Example I love my wife and if I had 300 dollars I would surley give her more that 10 percent which would be 30 dollars because I love her.The law says you must give LOVE says I chose to give because I love GOD and man.Again we don't have to use the law just love and spiritual sense because hate and a carnal senses will not understand.Now I have given you scriptures please do the same when you respond not your opinion.Please respond right away I await your answer.GOD BLESS.

It's not just some forms of Islam that make women wear burkas; Christianity has a history of many types of modesty teachings aimed at women: no makeup, you can only wear dresses, no two - piece bathing suits, skirts must match a prescribed length and so on.

«Taught from their infancy that beauty is woman's sceptre, the mind shapes itself to the body, and, roaming round its gilt cage, only seeks to adorn its prison.»

But they are only to be expected, since belief that a woman can indeed be «in Persona Christi» necessitates a Christology falling short of Chalcedonian catholicity (that Jesus Christ is both fully human and fully divine), and thus a general departure from the teaching of the Councils of Nicaea and Constantinople as expressed in the Creed.

Studying for his doctorate at Cambridge, he began to appreciate the scholarship of his female professors, concluding that «anyone who thinks it is wrong for a woman to teach in a church can be consistent with that point of view only if they refuse to read and learn from women scholars.»

I'm not sure if you studied how to make pho broth or if you had a family member teach you, but when I was researching pho (only a handful of blogs), you were the only one who roasted / charred the veggies — outside of an Vietnamese woman telling her story and listing her recipe ALSO roasting her veggies.

His favorite course this semester is a Thursday - only corporate finance lab, taught to a group of about 20 by a very pretty young woman who wears blue jeans in class and «just happens to be a terrific lecturer.

And it taught you to value women solely by a specific set of physical criteria that not only ignores who she is, but ignores what you yourself have to offer in this area.

We want the kids to see us as «same» and we think it teaches them not only respect and structure and security, but also the inherent belief that men and women are equally capable of love, discipline and hard work.

My husband, Steve, had a family friend who was due around the same time I was, putting us in the awkward spot of being constantly compared to each other in every way, shape, and form (especially shape and form - this woman had gained only twenty pounds during her entire pregnancy and had taught aerobics up until her due date; I had packed on more than thirty - five pounds and sat on my couch writing and napping for most of the nine months).

A wise wise woman on - line told me when our daughter was only a few weeks old that breastfeeding is Mama's first discipline she teaches her child.

I am not so religious as I once was, but the only explaination I can fathom why such tragedies are «allowed» is to serve as a teaching tool to warn other women from making the same mistakes.

Lamaze: Lamaze classes teach women that birth is normal, and focus not only on the birth process, but on informed decision - making, relaxation techniques, and optimal positioning for birth, as well.

Having another credential available to teach skills for supporting breastfeeding only serves to help us reach more women, and their babies with evidence - based, quality support.

A women and equalities select committee report from 18 months ago accused the government of being «misleading» in its claim that SRE is compulsory when it's only the biology aspects that have to be taught.

Many black women suffer from low self - confidence, have gaps in their knowledge from attending schools where science wasn't taught well or are influenced by stereotypes such as «only men do hard sciences» or «people of colour are not as smart».

But at that time people assumed that teaching was the only appropriate mathematical career for a woman and that a deaf person could never become a teacher.