Sentences with phrase «ontologizes eschatology»

The Christian understanding of marriage rests upon a whole complex of other doctrines, from creation to Christology to anthropology to eschatology.
It is on the topic of eschatology that I most favorably incline these days to Tim LaHaye's overall perspective.
Borrowing a secular eschatology from the Progressive movement, the next few American presidents — Theodore Roosevelt, Taft, Wilson — gave themselves over to schemes to reform and moralize the world.
If anything, I'm trying to get a group of readers / people to explore eschatology who never would have touched the subject before.
Eschatology — the study of the second coming and the end times — became a hot Christian topic.
Or, rather, for the modern man and modern woman there is no explanation (though perhaps environmental pollution now replaces the atom bomb in the fully modern eschatology).
• We've had bad experiences in modern times with the immanent eschatologies of the people who wanted to build heaven on earth or reestablish Eden — with Marxists and all the rest, who demanded, in one way or another, that the ultimate purposes of humankind be achieved.
A sadly minimalized form of realized eschatology, one might observe.
Late - stage liberalism, which calls itself «progressive,» embodies a distinctive secularized soteriology and eschatology.
It is an adventurous work of theological speculation on creation «out of nothing,» the Church and her sacraments, and the meaning of eschatology, including an imaginatively orthodox (and Orthodox) treatment of whether all, including the evil angels, will at last be redeemed.
It was the first public evidence of the project that had gradually taken shape in my mind during the preceding years: to work out on the level of systematic theology the ancient Israelitic view of reality as a history of God's interaction with his creation, as I had internalized it from the exegesis of my teacher Gerhard von Rad, after I had discovered how to extend it to the New Testament by way of Jewish eschatology and its developments in Jesus» message and history.
In each chapter, DeYoung addresses the most noteworthy, and often most controversial, emergent theological viewpoints, hitting on such issues as scriptural authority, inaugurated eschatology, eternal damnation, and Jesus's death and resurrection.
When I began to understand that one should not set history and eschatology, nor (therefore) history and God, in opposition to one another, the general direction of my further thought was determined.
(Other issues were also at stake, especially a shift in eschatology in which premillennialism tended to erode the commitment to social reform and probably various sorts of social class sortings out, but the themes sketched above better represent the fundamentalist self - consciousness.)
The director of information technology at the college where I was about to lecture on eschatology added, «This has been frustrating for everyone.
God is Uncategorized Bible & Theology Topics: best books, Bible Study, book reviews, Books I'm Reading, end times, eschatology, Paul, Theology - General, Theology of Jesus, Theology of the End Times
For example, I still remember in one of my «Eschatology» classes (study of the End Times), three different students were interacting with the professor about what we were learning.
What's more, history itself teaches us that when times are bad, eschatology thrives.
One doesn't hear much eschatology in my mainline denomination these days because most of us have got it so good.
I've picked through theology and eschatology, pneumatology and ecclesiology.
The Kingdom came in the person of Jesus, but it does not fully come until he returns (hence the issue of the already / not yet tension of eschatology in the gospels).
The limitation of the work is the unduly one - sided understanding of the eschatology of Jesus as «realized eschatology».
But once one has come to see Jesus in his first - century context of Jewish eschatology, the basic antithesis tends to disappear.
Moltmann's essay on play is entitled «The First Liberated Men in Creation,» but his focus is not on creation but on eschatology.
Simply Jesus is not just about Jesus, but about the church, the Gospel, the Kingdom of God, Israel, history, government, social involvement, and eschatology.
If Jesus» eschatology seems intentionally to ignore time, this is only because it intentionally centres in his person.
In an article on Tillich's theological method, Jacob Taubes states that Tillich eschatologizes ontology and ontologizes eschatology.13 I submit, to the contrary, that this interpretation does not apply at all to Tillich's ontology as it is fully elaborated in his Systematic Theology.
In this section we will trace the development of Altizer's thought since the publication of his first book, Oriental Mysticism and Biblical Eschatology, in 1961.
No, I am raising questions about various doctrines within ecclesiology, eschatology, angelology, and a few others.
The present volume is really a collection of studies, and it might easily have grown to twice its size if other topics had been included: for example the miracle stories — I should have liked to examine Alan Richardson's new book on The Miracle - Stories of the Gospels (1942)-- or a fuller study of the so - called messianic consciousness of Jesus, the theory of interim ethics, the relation of eschatology and ethics in Jesus» teachings — see Professor Amos N. Wilder's book on the subject, Eschatology and Ethics in the Teaching of Jesus (1939)-- the influence of the Old Testament upon the earliest interpretation of the life of Jesus — see Professor David E. Adams» new book, Man of God (1941), and Professor E. W. K. Mould's The World - View of Jesus (1941)-- or sonic of the topics treated in the new volume of essays presented to Professor William Jackson Lowstuter, New Testament Studies (1942), edited by Professor Edwin Prince Booth.
As in other cases, Rowan Williams is characteristic: his theology is deeply informed by Luther, Schleiermacher, Barth, Rahner, von Balthasar, Bonhoeffer and other continental Europeans, besides theologies from other parts of the world, and his recent book On Christian Theology covers theological method, biblical hermeneutics, creation, sin, Jesus Christ, incarnation, church, sacraments, ethics and eschatology, with the Trinity as the integrator.
But some scholars, such as Schweitzer, have argued that Jesus had a much more immanent eschatology.
Jürgen Moltmann, The Theology of Hope: On the Ground and the Implications of a Christian Eschatology, trans.
This is not to say that Bornkamm has moved to the position of «realized eschatology» (91); rather he sees (with Bultmann) the tension between future and present as inherent in the involvement of the imperative in the indicative, i.e. inherent in the historical understanding of the self.
Hence eschatology is a sickness, a sickness in both a Freudian and a Nietzschean sense, for it arises from what clearly appears to be an infantile or resentful attempt to abolish reality.
Hans Conzelmann has united these various lines of development into a unified view of Jesus» eschatology and his person, in which christology replaces chronology as the basic meaning of Jesus» message: the kingdom which Jesus proclaims is future, but the «interim» is of no positive significance to him.
All discussions of the teaching of Jesus, of the Kingdom of God or of New Testament eschatology include an interpretation of this saying.
In other words, Christian eschatology must be painted like creation in «the colors of aesthetic categories.»
Professor Bultmann agreed with Dr. Albert Schweitzer (cf.. The Quest of the Historical Jesus) that eschatology was an essential part of the teaching of Jesus, but he differed from Dr. Schweitzer in his conviction that the ethical teaching of Jesus is inseparable from his eschatology: both are based on the certainty that man is not sufficient unto himself but is under the sovereignty of God.
Thus his eschatology involves an «indirect» christology: «If the kingdom is so near that it casts this shadow, then the «observer» no longer has it before him, in the sense that he could still observe it from a certain distance; rather is he at that instant fully claimed.
(See «The Eschatology of the Second Century,» American Journal of Theology, 21:193 - 211.).
Christian eschatology and Incarnation now are seen to mean a total affirmation of the world, a total identification of the sacred with historical reality.
God is Uncategorized Bible & Theology Topics: 666, end times, eschatology, mark of the beast, Theology of the End Times
«my doctrines of ecclesiology, eschatology, angelology, and a few others are being undermined by the weight of exegesis.»
Christian eschatology, he answers, has a similar playful focus, i.e., it must be viewed as «totally without purpose, as a hymn of praise for unending joy, as an ever varying round dance of the redeemed in the trinitarian fullness of God, and as the complete harmony of soul and body.»
As Taubes says, Tillich «eschatologizes ontology» and «ontologizes eschatology» in the light of man's present situation: «His entire system rotates around the one eschatological problem: man's self - estrangement in his being and his reconciliation in the «new being.»»
(I have attempted to examine this view in an earlier article,» «Realized» Eschatology,» Christendom, 6:82 - 95.
Furthermore, he recognized that although Biblical eschatology resembled Oriental mysticism in its negation of the given reality, it was a different sort of negation, which somehow also affirmed the forward movement of time and history.
To affirm, for example, that the essential elements of Christianity in the first century were only those items which believers of that day have in common with the «liberal» theologian of the twentieth century, is to eliminate as unessential to first - century believers their realistic eschatology, their belief in demons and angels, their vivid supernaturalism, their sacramentalism, their notion of the miraculous content of religious experience, and various other features of similar importance.
Eschatology and / or the Second Advent deals not only with last things, but with ultimate things.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z