Sentences with phrase «open climate sceptics»

There is a strong minority of open climate sceptics in the Conservative party, Yeo told Leo Hickman, editor of Carbon Brief.

I think the articles of open climate sceptics like Joe reduces the credibility of WA Business News as a paper.

Not exact matches

I've been discussing climate change with lots of people at campaign stalls recently, and it has opened my eyes as to how far this «balanced» climate sceptic reporting is shaping the thinking of even those people who are concerned and want to see some action («I am aware that flying might make climate change worse, but I'll still do it because the warming may just be part of a natural cycle — I would stop if I was more certain»; «I am worried, but I have also heard that it is just water vapour which makes us warmer, so we just don't kow if this CO2 thing is true, everybody seems to have a different agenda» etc.).

Some of the more vocal of the establishment climate researchers have fallen into a mode of open denigration of climate sceptics («deniers» is the offensive popular terminology of the day).

Also, perhaps a more open - ended question would be what does he think the average sceptic MEANS when they say «I am sceptical about AGW, or CAGW, or the consensus position on climate sensitivity, or IPCC statements, or the possibility of mitigation...»

The unnamed scientist concluded: «Actually it is harmful as it opens the door for oversimplified claims of «errors» and worse from the climate sceptics media side.»

Setting aside the issue of who is right in the debate, some of the more vocal of the establishment climate researchers have fallen into a mode of open denigration of climate sceptics («deniers» is the offensive popular terminology of the day).

Tom Nelson is an important account for us climate sceptics and not having it damages Twitter's credibility as a platform for free speech, and for an open exchange of views.

The feeling seems to be that the climate science community behaved badly to these sceptics, the climate science community is promising to be more open to critics rather that block them out, so the «sceptics» mentioned in the emails must be allowed to give their side of the argument.