Maria, I admire that you allow
open comments here and I'm sure you expect silly non-constructive hateful ones like the one from anon.
Not exact matches
While I've got a new
comment open, though,
here's my thoughts on the Roth debate: It's generally good to diversify your funds as much as possible, tax-wise; nobody can say with absolute certainty what the tax system will look like numerous years from now (although the smart money says that it'll probably be even more complex than our current system).
Seeing that Julie has made it clear in multiple
comments here that she is entirely willing to
open the books for anyone who cares to challenge her version of events, we're left with only one conclusion.
Here is an
opening comment that I shared a few minutes ago.
If god wants to
comment on Chic fil - A I'm sure he can
comment anytime he can find an
open mike, like Graham
here.
The least negative
comment I would make
here about «
open» sexuality is that while it may be compatible with a large range of other social goods like justice and friendship, it is not clearly conducive to those broader social values.
Nothing in this article is hateful, racist or evil in any way shape or form, however 99 % of the
comments on
here are exactly that which the
open - minded and enlightened are supposedly against.
I think that sometimes the intent behind the
comments posted
here by non-believers is to try to crack
open the smallest hole in this «reality», to let the believers know — or at least start to consider the possibility — that there is more outside of their reality.
The
comments are
open here, and you can always hit us up on Twitter @CNNBelief.
I found it interesting that you used the words in your
comment that people on
here should «grow up», and then indicate that there is no
open discussion of the problems on
here but that you are obviously then openly discussing them elsewhere in an unbiased way that looks at the discussion from different angles and accepts different viewpoints.
For now,
here's part of a recent conversation I had with Jessalynn in which she explained why she's such an unabashed
open adoption supporter and how she deals with negative
comments by other birthmothers.
I'm concerned about
opening up a debate about whether the Ba'athist Party is * really Ba'athist (similar to all the
comments we see
here about whether the Socialist Party is really socialist, Libertarian Party really libertarian, etc.).
I won't
comment here on the party board decision to top - list incumbent MEPs, apart from to say that as someone selected twice in
open hustings I am the last person to complain about the party membership having the final say.
Xref — some discussion of paper (with links to more at SKS (Schmittner
comment), Planet3.0 interview, Tamino's
Open Thead)
here at Tamino's (link)
Just to go over real quick how this works... Meet
here every First Saturday of each month Make sure to visit each co-hosts -LCB- Deborah, Coco -RCB- Tweet the #UltimateCoffeeDate Share with fellow bloggers Link up you «coffee related» post Take a few moments over the weekend to visit all or as many of the bloggers possible Take time to leave a
comment Use the Ultimate Coffee Date badge somewhere on your post The link is
open all weekend, so you have plenty of time to enjoy ♥ If we were having coffee, I would share with you that our oldest son is leaving in two weeks for... Read More...
Haneke's films often involve an element of puzzle - solving, of piecing together the necessary information from the smallest of clues, and so it proves
here, as the film
opens with a secretly - filmed Snapchat sequence (including disparaging
comments) of a woman getting ready for bed that will only reveal its true significance later on.
You may have noticed a vigorous debate
here in the columns and
comment sections of the NewsJunkie, as well as the Mirror over proposals to
open up more charter schools in Connecticut.
Open communication helps us become a better dealership which is why our staff
here at Suburban Chrysler Dodge Jeep Ram of Ann Arbor welcome all kinds of
comments and criticism to let us know what ways we need to improve or what is working for you.
Here is the list: Quick Keys (For Mac users: substitute the command key for the control key) CTRL + N = New (document / project) CTRL + A = Select All CTRL + C = Copy CTRL + V = Paste CTRL + Z = Undo CTRL + Y = Redo CTRL + S = Save CTRL + O =
Open Alignment CTRL + L = Left Alignment CTRL + R = Right Alignment CTRL + E = Center Alignment CTRL + J = Justified Alignment Highlight Text and: CTRL + [= Make text smaller CTRL +] = Make text larger CTRL + K = Insert Hyperlink If you have any questions, then please leave them in the
comment section below, and I'll get back to you as soon as possible.
That site does not allow me to
comment on their false allegations, is not
open about who is behind it, and has not update any of their accusations with my response that can be found
here.
iv) Davys & Goodbodys — see
comments / links
here: https://wexboy.wordpress.com/2014/08/24/ntr-plc-wind-of-change/ You may have to
open an account, but ideally your current broker can simply deal with them on your behalf — I'd check this out sooner rather than later, as some brokers make it easy for a client to do something new / different, while others seem to relish making things impossible..!?
On a different note, reading
comments here, i am tempted to
open Questrade (sp) account for my RESP... with all the risk that comes with it.
I saw «several sites» forward and
comment on one single thread posted
here on Reddit, wherein someone claiming to work for a marketing company had gone into MS and supposedly saw MS employees with Reddit
open on their computers.
Mr. Schwabe
comments: «The work presented
here shows how deeply I am affected by the light and color of our surroundings: the water, the woods and the
open fields and all that nature's beauty has to offer those of us lucky enough to live on Long Island's East End.
2015 «Atsushi Kaga at Jack Hanley Gallery», New York Art Tours, July Mason, Shana Beth, «Atsushi Kaga at Jack Hanely, New York», International Arts and Culture, July «New York: Atsushi Kaga, «I am
here with you»
opens», New York Events, June «Friend of the Devil», The Lookout, Art in America, April 2014 Sansom, Anna, «Up in Armory: The Art Fair Unzipped», Damn ° 44 magazine, March Yasuhara, Shayna, «Armory Art Fair Highlights — Top 5», The Paint Pens Collective, March «2014 Armory Show», NYC Aesthetic, March Sutton, Benjamin, «Humorous Artworks Ease Fairtigue at 2014 Armory Show», artnet news, March 2013 O'Dwyer, Rebecca, «Happily Skipping Backwards (2013 — 1978)», mother's annual 2013 «Rabbiting on», CARA Magazine, December Abbott, Rosa, «Atsushi Kaga, Happily Skipping Backwards», Totally Dublin, December 2012 Blount, Mai, «The Sign of the Broken Sword», mother's annual 2012 Servin, James, «Rising Stars», Sea of Desire, Art Basel Miami Beach, December Chayka, Kyle, «A Mother - Son «Nerd Bag» Sweatshop @ Art Basel Miami Beach», Hyperallergic, Dec Cohen, David, «The Mother of All Invention», artcritical, December Battista, Kathy, «The highlights from Miami Art Week», Phaidon, December «Art Basel Miami Beach 2012 Preview: Part 5», Gallerist NY, December Cembalest, Robin, «Snapshots from Miami», ARTnews, December Duhon, Peter & Zwimpfer, Nathalie, «Art Basel Miami Beach 2012», Art
Comments, December Halperin, Julie & Corbett, Rachel, «Art Basel Miami Beach Sees Strong Lower - Market Buys, With Notable Standouts», Blouin Artinfo, December Mason, Shana Beth, «Miami Nice?
I'd also (in a way) strongly second Steve Mosher's preference that we respect Gavin and Michael's plea «to
open the discussion
here to all of the authors to give their thoughts...» Only the authors should post
comments (at least initially, and for some time after that), and the peanut gallery should watch.
[Dec. 11, 1:21 p.m. Updated The
comment thread on this post is to become an
open discussion of developments in basic climate science, as described in a new piece aimed at keeping other discussions
here on target.]
Off and on I've invited Dot Earth readers to
open discussions on books exploring core issues discussed on this blog, and
here's the latest, from Anna Haynes, a blogger and longtime Dot Earth
comment contributor.
Keep in mind that my
comments here are not about headlines, but about the cornerstone statements in a scientific paper, which are akin to the
opening paragraphs of a news story.
Courtney... I believe Aruda's
comments that
opened this thread pretty much sum up the inability of anyone
here to objectively look at the science of climate change.
I believe Aruda's
comments that
opened this thread pretty much sum up the inability of anyone
here to objectively look at the science of climate change.»»
My whole reason for starting to post
here was the fact that you
opened this whole thread with
comments suggesting that Universities are Orwellian.
You gained the stamp of approval of our host
here (as being «
open minded» because of your guest post and previous
comments), yet you are greeted with rather the opposite of
open mindedness from most of the denizens.
I am sure this analysis
here will now in response be mangled as well (and my
comments taken out of context, misrepresented, or me insulted), because, as usual, for most commenters, the goal is to refute Climate Change science and conclusions under the self deluded guise of «objective,
open minded analysis.»
«Unfortunately for this option, we have recently learned (through the kind intervention of Nielsen - Gammon
here), that, even in the case of
open review
comments, ethical standards within the climate science community forbid speculation on the identity of Reviewer # 2»
In the generally undirected spirit of the movement,
here is an
open thread for your
comments, predictions and so on.
Also for what it's worth, there are a number of
open - minded and knowledgeable individuals who host and regularly
comment here, who are willing to cordially engage in substantive conversations, and provide insights into some very technical and confusing areas.
But if, as I suspect, its simply a smokescreen by Realclimate to pop up
here, throw out a «the science is settled — come and see at Realclimate»
comment and then disappear without making any argument in
open forum then I think Venter has a point.
It doesn't mean «
open to all to
comment» because this post, and the replies to it, are a prime example of what happens when you
open discussion to a pile of ignorant bozos — you get mess, not knowledge [my apologies to the one ror two people
here who do know what they're talking about; I don't include them in my contempt, of course].
Brandon
commented on Judith's blog that he wrote his
opening message
here, because this issue is not significant for the climate discussion.
Time for a new
open thread, since apparently the previous one is now loading a little slowly... I'll close the old one to
comments, so please continue discussion
here.
Bob's
open to
comments here.
I'm definitely not an immigration lawyer and I won't even attempt to
comment here on whether or not the can of worms RBC has
opened up with iGate is legal, ethical, or good business practice.
I searched the SLAW archives for the phrase «
open access,» and Simon's two posts
here and
here (attracting no
comments) were the only results.
He's
open to
comments here on May It Please The Court — and has some great ones already.
A summary of the event with
comments and links to reactions was published by Peter Suber in his SPARC
Open Access Newsletter on Jan. 2, and,
here is a preprint of an article on the news, which is to appear in an upcoming Information Today.
But we're a
open - minded bunch
here at Android Central, so if you're jumping ship (or even just picking up an iPhone as a secondary device), we want you to hit the
comments and share your thoughts.
Craig Berke, your noted
comment here on REM regarding
open houses, brought to my attention a very old article I wrote several years ago, regarding the dangers and pitfalls of
opens, information that might be useful to REM readers and new agents; of course my writing is just «my opinion,» and opinions of others may be very different.
I am so pleased to read the
comments here and see that I am not the only one who thinks the
open concept idea is less than great.