Sentences with phrase «open court under»

Details, mostly he said - she said stuff, remain sketchy since the case has yet to be heard in open court under oath.

Not exact matches

And six months after the Democratic Party took control of both houses of Congress, the prison at Guantánamo Bay was still open and conducting drumhead courts martial of the prisoners held there; the CIA was still using «enhanced interrogation techniques» on prisoners in foreign jails; illegal intrusions into the privacy of American citizens continued unabated; and, more than fifty years after the CIA was founded, it continues to operate under, at best, the most perfunctory congressional oversight.

Shall the Missouri Constiitution be amended to define the term «person» to be from the beginning of biological development and grant such person constiitutional rights and access to courts under the equal protection, due process, and open courts provisions of the Missouri Constiitution?

The decision on Friday will open marriage legally in the remaining fourteen states, and will give new legal protection for those who got married under court rulings that actually could not be considered truly final until the Supreme Court itself had decided the constitutional quescourt rulings that actually could not be considered truly final until the Supreme Court itself had decided the constitutional quesCourt itself had decided the constitutional question.

In a statement, the DORH said: «State Attorney's Office in Osijek opened the investigation against Croatian citizen (1985) due to the existence of reasonable doubt that when giving testimony before the County Court in Osijek committed a crime against justice by giving false testimony under Article 305, paragraph 1 of the Criminal Code / 11.

Filed Under: Same Sex Parent, Trey Darnell Tagged With: adoption, gay adoption, gay parenting, gay parents, HRC, Human Rights Campaign, Johnson City Press, matt and trey adopt, open adoption, same - sex adoption, Supreme Court, The Next Family

Moreover, the court opened the door to 6 years of back pay for each those workers who have previously been paid under the 13 - hour rule.

He added that under Jonathan he wrote open letters and held private talks with the former president on corrupt governors in the country, noting that some of their cases were still pending in various courts.

Under a Supreme Court ruling on the ACA, states can open up Medicaid programs to cover many more low - income adults.

Under the terms of a court settlement reached with the aid of a nationally known desegregation researcher, the San Francisco Unified School District will open a currently unused facility to house the entire student body of a magnet middle school affected by the district's asbestos - cleanup program.

A state court averts the shutdown by ruling that the state is obligated under the California constitution to do whatever is necessary to keep the schools open.

But on the opening day of its new term, the high court let stand a federal appeals court ruling that said districts in most instances can not be held liable for so - called peer harassment under Title IX of...

A Florida law creating a state charter board was struck down in 2008 by a court in that state, but no schools had been opened under the Florida panel.

Mobile Modular designed and proposed a creative combination of modular buildings that could be strategically placed adjacent to the existing school building in an open field and on under - utilized tennis courts.

7) National: Hat tip to Diane Ravitch for pointing us to an article by Dave McKenna of Deadspin on the release, under court order, of emails written by outgoing Sacramento Mayor Kevin Johnson, «about his efforts to take control of the National Conference of Black Mayors, bankrupt it, and open a new organization that would promote charter schools.

(Calif.) In an effort to make charter school facilities ruled illegal in a recent court case compliant, state officials are recommending the unauthorized uses be allowed to temporarily remain open under a state waiver process.

As the bank started proceedings, it was set on the court calendar for hearing, assigned a case number which opens a record file under your name regardless of the out come, verdict or settlement prior to the hearing.

The court, just a few weeks before Tuymans opened a major show at David Zwirner London, rejected the defence's claim that the painting was a parody and therefore fell under fair use.

With its 2007 ruling in Massachusetts vs. EPA, the U.S. Supreme Court opened the door for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to regulate carbon dioxide emissions under the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments.

Under that court - ordered deadline, the Air Quality Board on Wednesday endorsed a revised plan for Rocky Mountain Power's 1970s - vintage Hunter and Huntington stations in Emery County and opened up a 30 - day public comment period.

Nearly three years after the US Supreme Court found that carbon dioxide could be defined as an air pollutant subject to regulation under the Clean Air Act, the US Environmental Protection Agency has completed a key prerequisite to opening the door to regulating emissions of six different greenhouse gases (CO2 being the primary one).

Opened in 1957, it was designed to be «more clinic, than court,» fostering a child - centred approach to youth justice that aims to address the underlying factors that lead young people to conflict with the law, including problems at home, poverty and under - housing, substance use and mental health issues.

[20]... Cross examination or discovery does not take place in open court (although it does take place under court supervision).

The defendant attempted to rely on the open court principle to demonstrate the right of non-parties to attend, which is enunciated subject to several exceptions under the Courts of Justice Act,

«Open - meeting laws have been upheld under the First Amendment by every court in the country that has ever considered the issue,» he said.

Under the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (Rule 11 (b)(1)-RRB-, a federal court may not accept a guilty plea without first addressing the defendant personally in open court.

Heartless bypass The ECtHR stated in its judgment that had the authority sought to evict the husband under the Housing Act 1985, s 84, it would have been open to him to ask the court to determine whether or not the wife had really left the home because of domestic violence and whether or not, in his personal circumstances, including his need to provide accommodation for his children during overnight visits several time a week, it was reasonable to grant a possession order.

Be that as it may, distress matters because a recent court case (Vidal Hall — v - Google) held that only distress rather than financial damage was needed to open up a claim against a data controller for compensation under the Data Protection Act (DPA) and for the time being this ruling stands.»

As governments, courts, and legal research institutions enable access and reuse of legal datasets under open licenses, new informational challenges arise: How can this information be appropriately linked to leverage interoperability and avoid data silos?

To file materials under seal with the court requires the court's approval and may require that the parties address the balance between the principle of an open courts and the harm from the public disclosure of the confidential information.

Are there other examples where an attorney prosecuted under the crime - fraud exception to attorney - client privilege was required to reveal his or her client list in open court?

The proposed amendment provides expressly that proceedings under V.R.C.P. 43.1 are an exception to the existing requirement that «testimony... shall be taken orally in open court» unless otherwise provided by specific rules.

On July 1, 2014, in a final judgment that can not be appealed, the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) in the case of S.A.S v. France (application no. 43835 / 11), validated French Law no. 2010 - 1192, which prohibits concealment of one's face in all places open to the public in France and found that the law does not violate the applicant's rights under the European Convention on Human Rights.

First, that the material under discussion here (which he expands to include court records) is intentionally public and generally accessible in an open and democratic society.

The German court sought advice on the precise conditions under which an ISS provider could benefit from this liability exemption and also whether an operator of an open wireless network (such as Mc Fadden) would qualify as an ISS provider in the first place.

I take from this that the Court of Appeal for Ontario is generally open to allowing the greater use of electronic documents within appeals, provided practices with respect to the use of electronic documents develop carefully, and — where the practice is a marked changed from the norm — under the vigilant eye of the court so that fairness and the proper hearing of an appeal are assCourt of Appeal for Ontario is generally open to allowing the greater use of electronic documents within appeals, provided practices with respect to the use of electronic documents develop carefully, and — where the practice is a marked changed from the norm — under the vigilant eye of the court so that fairness and the proper hearing of an appeal are asscourt so that fairness and the proper hearing of an appeal are assured.

Almost a century ago in Scott v. Scott, [1913] A.C. 417, the House of Lords gave strong effect to the open court rule in the context of a matter arising under the Divorce Act.

Just when most magistrates» legal advisers had cracked the question of what type of proceedings are child support proceedings in their court (they are not «family proceedings» because they are not listed in MCA 1980 s 65 (1) among those statutes which do give rise to «family proceedings»); just when the more alert had resolved that they are therefore civil proceedings, heard in open court and by the procedure set out in MCA 1980, s 53 and under the appropriate non-family procedural rules; along comes s 111A (5).

That kind of argument can be successful only if it challenges the General Court's findings of fact in paragraph 170 of the judgment under appeal, to the effect that «[t] he «last interested person» in the transparent and open tendering procedure in this case was candidate 4.

Accordingly, in the light of the facts of the present case, and having held in paragraphs 170 and 171 of the judgment under appeal, that the successful bid did not originate from a candidate who had participated autonomously in the tendering procedure from the beginning of that procedure, the General Court was correct in holding, in paragraph 174 of that judgment, that the requirement of an open and transparent procedure had not been observed (C - 127 / 16 P, paras 66 - 69, references omitted).

What, then, is the position of the defendant in these proceedings that are most often conducted in private chambers under Rule 23 (2) and not in open court on the public record?

However, the Court left open the issue of whether New Hampshire may be an inconvenient forum under RSA 458 - A: 18.

The case highlights a growing trend for the courts to enforce open justice in two significant ways, both which rely heavily on protections guaranteed under human rights law.

Skansen, a tiny contracting company with 30 people working in an open plan office no bigger than a court room, was dragged to the quarter deck of Southwark Crown Court and duly put on trial before a jury on a charge of failure to prevent bribery under section 7 of the Bribery Act, the first contested trial of this offence since the Act came into force in the summer of court room, was dragged to the quarter deck of Southwark Crown Court and duly put on trial before a jury on a charge of failure to prevent bribery under section 7 of the Bribery Act, the first contested trial of this offence since the Act came into force in the summer of Court and duly put on trial before a jury on a charge of failure to prevent bribery under section 7 of the Bribery Act, the first contested trial of this offence since the Act came into force in the summer of 2011.

Therefore, as they are permissible under New York law, it was open to the court to sanction the agreement, which it did.

They argue that it is not open to this court to infer that Tsilhqot» in overrules such previous cases such as Derrickson v Derrickson, 1986 CanLII 56 (SCC), [1986] 1 SCR 285, which expressly held that the right of possession for land held under a reserve is at the core of s. 91 (24) and triggers interjurisdictional immunity.

«The offences cognizable by military commissions may thus be classed as follows: (1) Crimes and statutory offences cognizable by State or U.S. courts, and which would properly be tried by such courts if open and acting; (2) Violations of the laws and usages of war cognizable by military tribunals only; (3) Breaches of military orders or regulations for which offenders are not legally triable by court - martial under the Articles of War.»

The Supreme Court of Canada opened the door in 2010 for plaintiffs to seek damages from the government based on breaches of their rights under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms («the Charter «-RRB-.

By a majority, the court held that while there have plainly been difficulties, «the state of the evidence does not justify an across - the - board conclusion that the scheme is of itself so unfair as to lie outside the range of lawful choices open to the Lord Chancellor and the LAA» in the administration of exceptional funding under section 10 of LASPO.

The Oregon court began by noting that under the state's recreational use statute, a landowner who opens up his land for the recreational use of the general public is not generally liable for injuries sustained by the public.