Sentences with phrase «open court violates»

Not exact matches

His lawyers claimed in court papers on Friday that the adult film actress — who allegedly had an affair with him beginning in 2006 — has violated a confidentiality agreement at least 20 times, opening her up to damages of $ 20 million.

Acting Justice Robert B. Wiggins of State Supreme Court in Livingston County, in the Finger Lakes region, wrote that it was possible that the Republican majority in the State Senate had violated the state's open meetings law as it discussed whether to bring the marriage bill to a vote.

The Swiss Federal Tribunal goes, as did the European General Court in 2005 (EU General Court (formerly Court of the First Instance), 21st September 2005, case T - 315 / 01, Kadi v Council of the EU & Commission of the EC), in that direction, by holding open the door for not carrying out resolutions which violate ius cogens (BGE 2A.783 / 2006, para. 9.2.).

On July 1, 2014, in a final judgment that can not be appealed, the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) in the case of S.A.S v. France (application no. 43835 / 11), validated French Law no. 2010 - 1192, which prohibits concealment of one's face in all places open to the public in France and found that the law does not violate the applicant's rights under the European Convention on Human Rights.

Justice Antonin Scalia opened the Supreme Court's new term Tuesday by questioning whether a man deported to Mexico after a drug conviction would be «abstaining from tequila» for fear of violating his U.S. parole terms.The remark came as justices heard an immigration case involving a Texas man, Reymundo Toledo - Flores, who was deported in April after being convicted of illegally entering the United States.

Today the BC Court of Appeal released reasons for judgement finding it is an open ended question whether BC's Privacy Act allows an employer to be vicariously liable when an employee willfully violates the privacy of another.

A federal appeals court has ruled that Aereo's TV - anywhere service doesn't violate copyright law, opening the door for the startup to expand a service that lets consumers watch television on their mobile device for as low as $ 1 a day.

In layman's terms, this last point ensures that what is said during a collaborative divorce process remains private, and it could potentially open up someone who violates the privacy provisions of a collaborative divorce to contempt of court.