Sentences with phrase «open court where»

Although here I admit their impact may be minimal since most litigator - bullies become obsequious and demonstrate faux - respect for opposing counsel in open court where a judge is presiding.

Not exact matches

A clause in the nondisclosure agreement requires that disputes be mediated in private arbitration, where proceedings are confidential, rather than in open court.

According to the lawsuit, filed in the San Francisco Superior Court, Spanish - speaking employees would go to places where they know immigrants would be, like construction sites and a 7 - Eleven, and would take them to a branch, have them open up a new account and would often pay the person $ 10 for opening the account.

Such crime if it took place any where in our Islamic lands and was caught for the crime... he will be torn to pieces there and then with out trial since trials are supposed for those who are suspected and not proven guilty... but as a case that is as plain they should have condemned him to worst death with out any need for court trials... But by being soft on the issue and giving ear to such junk you open doors for those copycats whom seek fame... That is only fair and secure..

After a day where sweltering temperatures caused one player to faint and another to vomit on the court, Andy Murray criticized the Australian Open's «extreme heat policy,» voicing concern over the safety of players exposed to 108 - degree heat Tuesday in Melbourne.

He is a marvel in the open court, where he looks like a runaway train with that combination of size and speed.

I do not think he is corrupt (at the moment) but from my point of view it certainly looks like bias.Also I doubt he would want to take the point many people are making (that he cheated) into a court and open what would be a very public discussion.Irrespective of the result the ramifications of such a case would be far reaching indeed and would maybe result in a fair system where footballers and not referees affect the outcome of football matches.

After college Cris continued to play open tournaments in northern california... He took a seven year break while doing realestate financing but has returned to the courts where he has started playing open tennis again.

«Now, taxpayers affected by the Supreme Court decision may amend any previously filed estate tax return where the statute of limitations to apply for a refund remains open,» said Commissioner of Taxation and Finance Thomas H. Mattox.

Beisel, 48, showed more fire in the belly, describing in emotional terms in his opening remarks how much it meant to him to be a judge in a court where he has worked for most of his adult life.

Set in the Dakota Territory of 1879, where survival is already a challenge, Petty brings a starkly unglamorized sensibility to life and mortality on the Dakota prairie: it opens with a boy come a courting to a farmgirl only to discover a massacre and what appears to be the abduction of the girl.

Jeff Nichols» Loving, which chronicles the couple behind the landmark 1967 Supreme Court Case Loving v. Virginia, begins its theatrical run via Focus Features today, just a day after an opening night screening at the Virginia Film Festival, the state where Mildred and Richard Loving were thrust to the forefront of the civil rights movement.

They are still in court with no end in sight anytime soon, but have opened Google eBooks where they only sell publisher approved ebooks.

Finally, enough students actually attended court, opening the eyes» of enough judges where they are now seeing that there's a national epidemic of illegal collection activity on private student loan debt.

The family room also opens onto the small but private court yard where you can sit and have breakfast or perhaps a glass of wine in the evening.

Take Fido to tennis camp this summer at Topnotch Resort, where the new «Serve, Fetch, Love» package opens its courts in Stowe, Vermont, to its four - legged gusts.

Building has lift / elevator * GYM / POOL ACCESS: Request Tariff (Adults only) to access the centre where you can relax and enjoy a solarium, two swimming pools - one indoor and one outdoor - a spa / beauty center for aesthetic and therapeutic treatments, fitness classes, an open air paddle court and two squash courts.

Over e-mail last year, after news broke that a developer retaliated against YouTuber Jim Sterling after his negative review with a DMCA takedown of it, Sterling told Kotaku that «In order to fight a counter-claim, they would have to pursue it in court... So far nobody's done that, as it's the point in the process where a developer actually opens itself up to any form of consequence — if they fail, the YouTuber can then take them to court and seek damages.

Billed as a soft opening, Punjab's first - ever international contemporary arts festival launched on 3 March, with performances staged in the courtyard of the Ran - Baas and before the magnificent Darbar Hall, where the Raj had held court, and which still flourishes gilded plaster mouldings, walls inlaid with mirrored glass and 14 crystal, status - symbol, F&C Osler chandeliers.

Later scenes are set on 57th Street in Manhattan (where she opens a gallery), on stage in the Yiddish theater and as a flamenco dancer, and a wild» round - the - world trip with a four - month stay in Burma (where she becomes the court painter).

Pickstone has a solo exhibition opening at the New Art Centre at Roche Court on 6 April 2013 where she will show a number of paintings from her series depicting famous female authors in a fictional parkland, inspired by Regent's Park and the writers associated with it.

Gallery central has shifted to the South End's SoWa District, where developer GTI Properties has courted art galleries and boutiques with lower rents, easier parking, a pedestrian thoroughfare, and a popular monthly First Friday communal opening reception.

A landmark trial opens today in Baltimore's Federal District Court, where Waterkeeper Alliance has filed suit against Perdue Farms, and a pair of the company's farmer contractors, Alan and Kristin Hudson, for polluting the Chesapeake Bay

The fight went all the way to Israel's Supreme Court, where the legal basis for removing the signs was provided by a 40 year old law originally intended «to place a limit on abandoning open spaces to ugliness, so that the fields and hills will not be stained as well with objects foreign to them» according to Israeli author and former legislator S. Yizhar.

Whether it's an adult child living in another state that has to open a probate in their parent's estate or a non-local small business being sued in local court, there are plenty of instances where a non-local client is looking for a local attorney.

Outgoing AALS president Paul Marcus of the William & Mary Law School organized the opening plenary on access to justice where he was joined by Cara Drinan of Catholic University of America's Columbus School of Law, Associate Justice S. Bernard Goodwyn of the Virginia Supreme Court, veteran legal aid attorney and former executive director of Bay Area Legal Aid Alex Gulotta, and Legal Services Corporation vice chair and former Harvard Law School dean Martha Minow.

Where appropriate, it is also open to the court to require counsel to adduce evidence as to the allocation of responsibilities and fees within a consortium (i.e. between the constituent firms).

Are there other examples where an attorney prosecuted under the crime - fraud exception to attorney - client privilege was required to reveal his or her client list in open court?

In her new book, Privacy in Context, and in her presentation at the 2010 Princeton Open Government Workshop, Nissenbaum defines the right to privacy as the right to what she calls «contextual integrity,» meaning the use or «flow» of information consistent with the norm for information transfer applicable in the particular context — such as home, school, workplace, court, etc. — where the information was first transferred.

Moreover, let's imagine the scenario where a partner has to announce in open court (or in a filing with the court) the aggregate amount that his law firm donated.

The Court of Appeal thereby left open the possibility, albeit a potentially unlikely one, of relief being refused even where the breach in question was insignificant.

I take from this that the Court of Appeal for Ontario is generally open to allowing the greater use of electronic documents within appeals, provided practices with respect to the use of electronic documents develop carefully, and — where the practice is a marked changed from the norm — under the vigilant eye of the court so that fairness and the proper hearing of an appeal are assCourt of Appeal for Ontario is generally open to allowing the greater use of electronic documents within appeals, provided practices with respect to the use of electronic documents develop carefully, and — where the practice is a marked changed from the norm — under the vigilant eye of the court so that fairness and the proper hearing of an appeal are asscourt so that fairness and the proper hearing of an appeal are assured.

26 The Report of the Attorney General's Advisory Committee on Charge Screening, Disclosure and Resolution Discussions (the Martin Committee Report)(1993), at p. 369 (in a passage approved in R. v. Rajaeefard (1996), 27 O.R. (3d) 323 (C.A.) at 330 - 1), observed: Consequently, in the interest of encouraging the parties to fully explore their case at a pre-hearing conference without prejudice to their right to subsequently litigate fully all unresolved issues in open court, it is the Committee's view that the parties should, where either one thinks it appropriate, be able to insist on a trial before a different judge.

As Justice McIsaac quoted, the Committee's rationale for this recommendation insists... in the interests of encouraging the parties to fully explore their case at a pre-hearing conference without prejudice to their right to subsequently litigate fully all unresolved issues in open court, it is the Committee's view that the parties should, where either one thinks it appropriate, be able to insist on a trial before a different judge.

The open - handedness of the way in which this guidance was debated and then given by Keehan J contrasts markedly from the genesis of the guidance given by Mr Justice Mostyn in UL v BK (Freezing Orders: Safeguards: Standard Examples)[2013] UKHC 1735 (Fam), [2013] All ER (D) 277 (Jun)(on Imerman documents), and by Pauffley J in Re NL (above) where she and the president roasted the practices of the Reading Magistrates» Court.

In the two - track approach to the European human rights project, where the Luxembourg Court is also proactive in providing guidance, the Strasbourg Court in 2013 in M.E v Sweden is being asked by the interveners [42] to apply the guidance of the UK Supreme Court, [43] and the UK Upper Tribunal, [44] in engaging with the risk group (those who are open), and how they are identified («not being straight enough, including straight individuals, due to non-compliance with a heteronormative stereotype in the eyes of the potential persecutor»), independent of whether an individual is «voluntarily discrete», where such discretion is due to a well - founded fear of persecution.

From a legal aspect, in the case of John Burridge v Air Work Ltd (2004) the court addressed the responsibility of cyclists, as well as drivers in the situation where a car door, or minibus door in this specific case, is opened into the path of a cyclist.

See, for example, Ediger v. Johnston, 2011 BCCA 253 at para. 84: «where both parties have led expert evidence on the issues of causation, it is not open to this court to apply the «common sense» reasoning urged in Snell».

Francis George Solicitor - Advocate deals with all elements of Family Law from the opening consultations to contesting matters in the Courts where required.

Seyfarth Synopsis: The U.S. Supreme Court's decline of a Seventh Circuit appellate decision solidifies that where an employee is medically unable to return to work within a very short time period following a leave of absence, the employer has no additional federal legal obligation to provide additional leave, or hold the employee's job open.

During trial, where a victim testifies in court, all of the victim's depositions answers can be used against the victim in open court.

The courts have an inherent jurisdiction to determine how the principle of open justice should be applied [27]- [37] and can permit the identity of a party or witness to be withheld from public disclosure where necessary in the interests of justice [38 - 41].

The Court was careful to leave the door open by stating that there may be some cases where the Code may apply to partnerships, but that such a finding would only be justified in a situation where the powers, rights and protections normally associated with a partnership were greatly diminished.

However, it is in open contradiction with the following finding of the CJEU in the same Judgment: «[c] lear and sufficient consumer information is important where the trader wishes to ensure that consumers can identify a prize and assess its nature» (para 53) and, therefore «[l] ike every other item of information provided by a trader to a consumer, information on the substance of the prize must be examined and assessed by the national courts in the light of recitals 18 and 19 in the preamble to the -LCB- Dir 2005 / 29 / EC], and of Article 5 (2)(b) of the directive.

AB 9375 Allows cities to keep City Courts open in the evening where court administrators determine that the court should schedule night sessions.

SB 1269 Requires any meeting of Supreme Court justices where voting for a candidate for the office of attorney general and reporter occurs to be subject to the open meetings law.

The team has also been involved in a number of important «open justice» challenges to facilitate press reporting of the courts, including leading a group of five media organisations in successfully challenging an arrangement where the former head of the Financial Services Authority would otherwise have given evidence in private in the Lloyds Bank shareholder litigation.

However, given that the Tribunal has accepted (and distinguished) the High Court judgment in Devenish (that the award of exemplary damages is excluded where a regulatory fine has been imposed), the Cardiff Bus judgment is by no means opening the floodgates of massive punitive damages awards in this area.

The Court seems to leave the door open for situations where the trial court believes that there is a bona fide desire to wait for an expected clarification in the law, but it would seem to be a risky bet for a defendant if its actions could just as well be perceived as done for strategic benCourt seems to leave the door open for situations where the trial court believes that there is a bona fide desire to wait for an expected clarification in the law, but it would seem to be a risky bet for a defendant if its actions could just as well be perceived as done for strategic bencourt believes that there is a bona fide desire to wait for an expected clarification in the law, but it would seem to be a risky bet for a defendant if its actions could just as well be perceived as done for strategic benefit.

The Aboriginal right to trade is still very much open to judicial recognition regardless of the finding in R. v Mitchell where the Supreme Court of Canada found that the claimed Aboriginal right (to cross-border trade) never came into existence.