Here's tonight's official
open discussion thread for the January 30, 2018, edition of WWE Smackdown Live.
Not exact matches
Although the
thread was
opened over a year ago, the
discussion lit up again and the subject remains interesting.
This kind of
thread is important because it is freeing, it shines light, it makes that which is already public (court cases, conferences, etc.) into a really
open discussion that really does matter.
I am not a theologian and do not assume to know the mind of God nor am I a man of any particularly extensive education so I do not claim that I have the answer at all I just notice that this
thread did not get much attention and so thought that I might take it upon myself to
open it up for further
discussion for those interested I will check back periodically to continue the
discussion.
With all due respect admin we've had this
discussion over and over let's either leave
threads open longer of choose different topics
There's no preview for the Chelsea game tonight — I'm still on holiday in Sweden and enjoying a little break from writing — so I'm just
opening up a
thread for comment and
discussion on the game.
The last
thread seems to have very little
discussion about polls and lots of partisan argument, so I thought it time for an
open thread.
But in the mean time, here's a new
thread for
open discussion of climate science and related matters not discussed in other recent
threads.
And speaking of phantom
threads (I'm so sorry), I don't think we should end this
discussion without acknowledging this film's overt connection to the 1940 Alfred Hitchcock film Rebecca, which Anderson has been
open about.
All
discussion threads are
open indefinitely, so feel free to join in, contribute, share links to cool things you find etc whenever.
The term «DRM» has so often been brought up as a so - called «remedy» for the «P» word, I thought perhaps the
thread was
open to full
discussion.
In this
thread from the Canadian Money Forum, there was a very interesting
discussion about the importance of considering the size and / or stability of a discount broker when
opening an account.
# 519 Thomas said fwiw, I am intentionally avoiding UV and posting this type of info here on FR only — new class of
open thread for
discussions of climate solutions, mitigation and adaptation.
This is a new class of
open thread for
discussions of climate solutions, mitigation and adaptation.
This is mid-month
open -
thread for all
discussions, except those related to Diogenes» comments.
[Dec. 11, 1:21 p.m. Updated The comment
thread on this post is to become an
open discussion of developments in basic climate science, as described in a new piece aimed at keeping other
discussions here on target.]
First
open thread of 2012, so perhaps some
discussion of the highlights and lowlights of 2011 are in order?
So given that I have spent about 40 minutes on this blog post, I am leaving this topic
open as a
discussion thread, and not contributing much myself.
The purpose is to stimulate
discussion on energy issues, and community members should feel free to turn these into
open thread energy
discussions.
The
Open thread is the place for
discussion.
Here's another
open thread for general
discussion.
If anyone can point to a substantive detailed
discussion of this, I'd appreciate a comment on the current
open thread.
I do not mind
open - ended
discussions of this type, but this
thread is surely not the place for them.
As there's a serious
discussion going on here I'll have a go at responding re logical positivism in me simple fashion anon on «
Open Thread.»
«
Open» — all comers, beginner questions welcome «Pro» — no beginner commentary (perhaps a «side»
thread can be created for peanut gallery
discussions)
Here's another
open thread for general
discussion (I'll try and
open these more frequently from now on, say every month or two).
I also participated in a
discussion on this on the
Open Thread, and especially Bob Tisdale's WUWT response to it, which got wrong what many skeptics here are getting wrong.
But in the mean time, here's a new
thread for
open discussion of climate science and related matters not discussed in other recent
threads.
I do not want to
open old wounds in this
thread, but in order to explain what I mean I will have to risk that by explaining them it may lead to a diversion into
discussion of their merits.
Time for a new
open thread, since apparently the previous one is now loading a little slowly... I'll close the old one to comments, so please continue
discussion here.
This
thread is the «Fukushima philosophical
discussion open thread».
Here's an
open thread for various climate science related
discussions, to prevent more off - topic clutter everywhere else.
We are going to try and ensure that there is always an
open thread for off - topic questions and
discussions.
***** the previous responses to this have been moved to
open thread, continue the
discussion over there if you want to
(Adjustments to) satellite measurements and
discussions about what is worse, global warming or mitigation, are for the
open thread.
Judith no doubt will have seen this post by Tony Brown and it is likely that she will
open this for
discussion under a different
thread.
Reddit users explain in this
discussion thread that it's technically enough to
open a YouTube video in Safari and then lock the phone to have the content run in the background.