And certainly 40 years of
open fossil fuel burning seems like no minor matter.
Not exact matches
Footnote * It's worth noting that Peter Raven was one of dozens of signatories to a 2014 «
open letter to environmentalists on nuclear energy» endorsing this statement: «the full gamut of electricity - generation sources — including nuclear power — must be deployed to replace the
burning of
fossil fuels, if we are to have any chance of mitigating severe climate change.»
However, if one considers the enormous increase of reactive nitrogen in our biosphere, due to the use of synthesized fertilizer and the
burning of
fossil fuels, its impact is not part of the analysis, even tough this increase shows up in the eutrophication (nutrient enrichment) of
open waters all over the world, resulting in excess algae, in some areas causing large algae blooms (as where they are going to hold the sailing regattas during the Olympics), red tides and dead zone, as the 8000 square mile dead zone in the Gulf of Mexico.
Mitigation is also achieved in organic agriculture through the avoidance of
open biomass
burning, and the avoidance of synthetic fertilizers, the production of which causes emissions from
fossil fuel use.
Holding oil companies liable for producing
fossil fuels would also
open up cities to liability for building roads and facilitating travel with vehicles that
burn those
fuels.
Leasing
opens the door for oil and gas drilling and fracking, and more
fossil fuel burning.
When the United States and Australia broke the promises they made at the 1997 Kyoto conference by declining subsequently to ratify the protocol they were refusing to discipline themselves and were keeping
open their futures, the option to
burn as much
fossil fuel as they liked.
Observational evidence suggests that some organic aerosol compounds from
fossil fuels are relatively weakly absorbing but do absorb solar radiation at some ultraviolet and visible wavelengths (e.g., Bond et al., 1999; Jacobson, 1999; Bond, 2001) although organic aerosol from high - temperature combustion such as
fossil fuel burning (Dubovik et al., 1998; Kirchstetter et al., 2004) appears less absorbing than from low - temperature combustion such as
open biomass
burning.