Sentences with phrase «open public proceedings»

Not exact matches

While areas are open to the public to watch proceedings or on guided tours, access is limited and controlled.

It is mandatory that such proceedings be held in private, not in public or open court as has unfortunately been done in this case.

The proceedings would be open to the public, Web - based, and available for submissions and testimony by interested parties.

However the proceedings end, it is all money that could have been better spent on keeping libraries open to the public.

To implement open selection, determine which areas of the shelter will be accessible to the public, allowing as much access as possible to animals in stray hold while protecting people from exposure to dangerous animals or those involved in legal proceedings.

The galleries will be open to the public as usual and visitors will be able to observe proceedings with Her Royal Highness» during her visit.

And all of the proceedings are in open court and documented by the submissions and court stenographer, to be judged by the public at large.

Representative Brad Miller (D - NC) called a for a motion to allow both film crews to remain and document the proceedings, which is open to the public, but this was denied by Republicans in the room.

These proceedings should be in the open and public, and the right to trial by jury preserved.

Arbitration proceedings are not open to the public.

Senior members of the judiciary were made aware of the conditions at the Don Jail and the fact that these proceedings held there were not open to the public.

In addition, court proceedings are open to the general public.

Moreover, despite the judicial system's wariness of digital media technologies, their integration into the courtroom is strongly supported on the basis of the «open court» principle — that venerated ideal within the English justice system that holds court proceedings must be open to the public and that publicity as to those proceedings must be unconstrained.

In addition the floor amendment specifies commission proceedings would be subject to the state's open meetings act / open to the public and prohibits closed or executive meetings except for sensitive financial or background check information.

Lord Atkinson recognized the privacy concerns which arise in divorce and matrimonial cases, but nevertheless re-affirmed the public interest in open court proceedings.

This interim guidance applies to court proceedings which are open to the public and to those parts of the proceedings which are not subject to reporting restrictions.

What, then, is the position of the defendant in these proceedings that are most often conducted in private chambers under Rule 23 (2) and not in open court on the public record?

A: People are generally unaware that the courtroom is public and open to the community or the press; anyone can sit in the courtroom during these proceedings.

On the issue of confidentiality, while the Court was mindful of the important reasons underlying the principle of open court, it felt that the privacy interests of the applicant (given the sensitive nature of the proceedings and the evidence) outweighed the interests of the public, and felt that the issuance of written reasons (with identities concealed) would satisfy any public need.

Administrative proceedings open to the public or any conversations that would likely be overheard or recorded are not considered «confidential» for the purposes of eavesdropping.

We are therefore pleased to have been given an opportunity to respond to the Singapore Ministry of Law's public consultation on opening up access to justice in arbitral proceedings within Singapore.

42, § 19 (1848)(providing [23] that pretrial proceedings should not be deemed an open court and that the public could therefore be excluded); Magistrates» Courts Act, 15 & 16 Geo.

Another case which has recently been settled without being resolved on the merits (Waldman v. Thompson Reuteurs Canada Ltd. — discussed in my blog post here) raised the issue of whether the open courts principle effectively creates an implied public licence to use any materials submitted to the courts as part of court proceedings.

When rules, decisions and proceedings by ethics enforcers are open to public view, there is less opportunity for them to abuse the system in their own interest.

Faster, more open and affordable access to court records and proceedings will help the public and the media be full witnesses to the administration of justice.»

(b) the salutary effects of the order, including the effects on the right of civil litigants to a fair trial, outweigh its deleterious effects, including the effects on the right to free expression which includes the public interest in open and accessible court proceedings (the «proportionality» branch).

According to the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure, information on patent reexamination proceedings are open to inspection by the general public.27 The most recent filing data includes both inter partes and ex parte reexamination proceedings through December 31, 2007.28

People are generally unaware that the courtroom is public and in many instances open to any member of the press or community who can sit in the courtroom during these proceedings.