Delfani warns that «in a world in which openness, flexibility and freedom from bureaucracies and cooperation are elements that belong to a capitalistic mode of organising labour and production, we must rethink any easy commitment to
open science as good per se.»
Not exact matches
As well as working with Opening Ceremony, Intel in March bought fitness bracelet maker Basis Science and it has teamed up with watch retailer Fossil Group to develop other wearable computing device
As well
as working with Opening Ceremony, Intel in March bought fitness bracelet maker Basis Science and it has teamed up with watch retailer Fossil Group to develop other wearable computing device
as working with
Opening Ceremony, Intel in March bought fitness bracelet maker Basis
Science and it has teamed up with watch retailer Fossil Group to develop other wearable computing devices.
«Ready Player One,» director Steven Spielberg's
science - fiction thriller about a grim world where people seek escape through virtual reality,
opened as the top film in North American theaters, delivering the first No. 1 debut this year for Warner Bros..
Liboiron uses her position
as the head of the Civic Laboratory for Environmental Action Research to advocate for
open science hardware and lead «a small but growing movement for people who make technology and instruments
open source,» something she describes
as «very much against the model that runs many universities around the world.»
As the first JLABS to
open outside the United States, JLABS @ Toronto joins a network of life
science facilities that are based throughout the United States in San Diego (flagship), San Francisco, South San Francisco, Boston and Houston.
However, Speth left
open the possibility of new investment in Britain such
as an electric battery and car plant if the conditions, including pilot testing and support from
science, were right.
«America's strengths include [the fact it is a] society that attracts talent from around the world and assimilates them comfortably
as Americans; and a language that is the equivalent of an
open system that is clearly the lingua franca of the leaders in
science, technology, invention, business, education, diplomacy and those who rise to the top of their own societies around the world.»
Ancient religions should welcome the political achievements of modernity while calling modernity to
open its windows and doors to a world of transcendent truth and love: ``... the great achievements of the modern age» the recognition and guarantee of freedom of conscience, of human rights, of the freedom of
science and hence of a free society» should be confirmed and developed while keeping reason and freedom
open to their transcendent foundation, so
as to ensure that these achievements are not undone....
A person of
science, such
as yourself should be
open to all possibilities, lest your theory be proven incorrect and you are left with nothing.
As described in my article on The Judeo - Christian Origin of
Science» [1], science is based on specific fundamental beliefs about the natural world, namely that matter is good, rational and contingent and open to the human mind, and that any discoveries that may be made should be shared
Science» [1],
science is based on specific fundamental beliefs about the natural world, namely that matter is good, rational and contingent and open to the human mind, and that any discoveries that may be made should be shared
science is based on specific fundamental beliefs about the natural world, namely that matter is good, rational and contingent and
open to the human mind, and that any discoveries that may be made should be shared freely.
That balance has changed considerably in the past few years,
as alternative avenues of stem - cell
science have
opened up and it increasingly seems like whatever therapeutic potential such cells may someday have could be explored and achieved without the destruction of embryos.
As inhabitants of the modern world, we are religious now perhaps to the extent of our desire to crack
open the coffin of materialism, and to give to reality a larger, freer definition than is allowed by the militant materialists of the corporate economy and their political servants, or by the mechanical paradigm of reductive
science.
One could turn to many artists for a precedent for a newly evangelised culture comprising imaginative activities that are
open to the transcendent, a culture that integrates human creativity in art, literature and
science with the call to holiness, to a life that acknowledges truth, goodness and beauty
as having their source in the divine.
2 This is to resolve the question that Hartshorne leaves
open — although,
as I have argued, some of his own statements imply the same resolution — namely, whether «existentialism or phenomenology may have something neither metaphysical nor quite within the scope of
science to contribute» (CSPM 296).
I believe that Wesley would have approved a counteroffensive against a good deal that we are asked to think and believe
as people
open to contemporary scholarship and
science.
Though the champions of «environmental justice» may not realize the Pandora's Box that they have
opened, the shift in the ecology movement from a focus on
science to radical egalitarianism should come
as no surprise.
Make sure you do not put all your belief in
Science, for this is so far beyond that and hopefully your eyes will
open, and if they do not, we,
as Christians are sad for you, more sad for you than the Pastor who stands before death's door and will not renounce Jesus
as Lord.
Given Whitehead's general principle of reciprocity (of the interconnectedness of all things) we are more than justified in concluding that nature possesses structures analogous to those which we find present in mind (though the exact nature of those structures must remain
open to particular investigation, that is, they must be discovered through specialized modes of inquiry such
as those of the special
sciences).
Modern
science is incorporated in an illumination of Jesus» lineage at the
opening of Matthew: a Jewish menorah serves
as Jesus» family tree, with his ancestors» names written in Hebrew and English.
He never considered his own word
as in any way final, but
open to modification by further developments in the
sciences.
«What Cini regards
as dangerous is the fact that the Pope may try to
open a dialogue between faith and reason, to re-establish a connection between the Judeo - Christian and the Greek tradition, and that
science and faith may not be separated by an impenetrable wall».
I think it is sad that, in the 21st Century, most major newspapers still carry astrology columns and that the Bronze Age mythology of Adam and Eve is still seen
as true by about 40 % of the country, but things are changing slowly,
as the inevitable forces of
science and reason pry
open even the most firmly closed of creationist minds.
The corporate economic entities are most «creative and efficient» and, therefore, most powerful, controlling modern
science and technology
as well
as information and communication in the global market and seeking to knock down all cultural, national or political barriers in order to
open high ways for their market plays.
Benedict XVI described religion
as «a fundamental ingredient for dialogue in which faith is
open to
science and
science to faith.
It is fundamental to any adequate understanding of Ricoeur to note that his phenomenology is so constructed
as to be
open to the «signs» generated by «counter-disciplines,» and indeed to read the meaning of human existence «on» a world full of such expressions generated by the natural and social
sciences,
as well
as in the history of culture.
Just
as the world of poetic texts
opens its way across the ruins of the intraworldly objects of everyday existence and of
science, so too the new being projected by the biblical text
opens its way across the world of ordinary experience and in spite of the closed nature of that experience.
As for
science and Richard Hawkins and all the rest like this, no issue, ALL comments
open.
While some cultural leaders (such
as John Dewey and Sidney Hook) were saying that the
open - minded attitudes of liberal, secular
science were the only was to build a civilization free from prejudice and irrational intolerance, many other prominent spokesmen were saying that Christianity and the Judeo - Christian tradition could provide the best basis for a truly tolerant and liberal civilization.
One can in this general way regard the implicate order
as a further development of what is already present in Spinoza,
as well
as in Heraclitus, Cusano, Leibniz, Whitehead and others, a development that is capable of making full contact with modern
science, and yet
opens up a way to assimilate common experience and general philosophical reflections on this experience, to give a single, whole, unfragmented world view.
When the astronomical revolution of the sixteenth century — in which the Italian philosophers of the Renaissance played a far more important role than historians of
science admit — removed the universal cosmic clock, there were two alternative ways
open to physics and philosophy of nature: either to retain the relational theory of time and to hold with Bruno (Bruno 1879, p. 144) that «there are
as many times
as there are the stars» (tot tempora quot astra), since there is no body possessing a privileged rotation motion, and the only body which allegedly had it — the sphere of the fixed stars — has been swept away; or to save the unity and homogeneity of time by separating it from any particular motion — and this is what Newton did, anticipated in this respect by Isaac Barrow and, in particular, Gassendi.
Why not acknowledge
science's clear expertise in scientific matters and quietly -LRB-»cause when you
open our mouth you leave no doubt about your intelligence) continue to cling to what's left of your myths for
as long
as you can?
Scientists are people, they are flawed, and I'm pretty sure God did not provide us with the mental ability to fully understand how he pulled everything off, but either way, In General
science spends it's time trying to figure out how God did it... not why... you want to know why... I propose to you,
as you suggested I
open another book and learn, i propose you
open a Bible and learn why God Created you.
History and
science have simply
opened the way to a much more complex truth concerning who we are and what we are
as humans.
Examples of this sort, taken from well - established
sciences, may serve
as practicing ground for biology and the higher - rung domains in which the shaping of the appropriate simples is still an
open problem.
«This limits where we can ship fruit, but
as the current
science has proven canker can not be spread from packed fruit, our marketing avenues have begun to
open up again,» Rodgers says.
Collaborating
as home - brewers since 1995, Pete and Ben Wiens
opened Wiens Brewing Company in 2012; in the years between Pete earned a degree in fermentation
science at U.C. Davis, and a dozen years of professional, brewery production experience.
In 2012 the Government precluded all future Free Schools (i.e. those not already
open) from teaching pseudoscience
as science and required them to teach evolution,
as well
as requiring them to promote British values.
As with all online platforms, interact and engage with your readers through your work and the
open questions in your area of
science.
The National Museum of Emerging
Science and Innovation, also known
as Miraikan,
opened in 2001.
She currently implements a landmark
science cooperation agreement between AAAS and the Cuban Academy of Sciences, develops the Center's global science diplomacy education and capacity building initiatives, leads a research project analyzing science - policy connections around the world, and serves as an associate editor of the open - access policy journal Science & Dip
science cooperation agreement between AAAS and the Cuban Academy of Sciences, develops the Center's global
science diplomacy education and capacity building initiatives, leads a research project analyzing science - policy connections around the world, and serves as an associate editor of the open - access policy journal Science & Dip
science diplomacy education and capacity building initiatives, leads a research project analyzing
science - policy connections around the world, and serves as an associate editor of the open - access policy journal Science & Dip
science - policy connections around the world, and serves
as an associate editor of the
open - access policy journal
Science & Dip
Science & Diplomacy.
I would be able to relocate for the right job and would also consider working overseas.I'm not interested in scientific publishing or journalism, but I am
open to wider suggestions
as I am feeling quite disillusioned about research and
science in general following my recent experiences.What can a 35 - year - old academic do outside of
science and technology?Jeff
But
as Michael Nielsen advocates, there should be a way to acknowledge contributors to crowdsourcing and
open science projects, otherwise there are no incentives to take part in them.
Back in 2007, when the ERC
opened its first call, Boivin saw it
as an ideal opportunity to bring together the natural
sciences and humanities to study the past.
We do not cover developments of interest only to specialists, such
as new animal models of a disease or the
opening of new
science research centres.
Instead, retaining the claws probably helps northern true seals catch a larger meal than they could with the stiff, slippery fins of other pinnipeds such
as sea lions and fur seals, Hocking and his colleagues report April 18 in Royal Society
Open Science.
New opportunities for early career scientists to work at the interface of computer
science and other scientific disciplines are expected to
open up in Europe in the coming years
as Microsoft plans to invest big money in European
science.
It wasn't official, of course, but the big idea kept popping up:
Science as a whole should consider adopting the ideals of «Web 2.0,» becoming more like the community process behind Wikipedia or the
open - source operating system Linux.
Such successes have
opened our eyes to new ways of funding
science, such
as the Experiment crowdfunding platform (experiment.com).
The technology, to appear
as the cover article in the March 20 print issue of
Science, allows ready - to - use products to be made 25 to 100 times faster than other methods and creates previously unachievable geometries that
open opportunities for innovation not only in health care and medicine, but also in other major industries such
as automotive and aviation.
To be successful, she argues, the young scientist must: 1) be aware of the geography of the journey, 2) be
open to
as many options
as possible so that course changes can be made with minimal pain, 3) practice solid «people» and presentation skills (oral and written)
as often
as possible, and 4) be committed to the endeavor of hard work that is successful
science.