Not exact matches
Within program expenses, major transfers to persons were up $ 1.1 billion, primarily due to higher old age security payments, reflecting an increase in the number
of recipients and higher inflation, as benefits are indexed to quarterly changes in the consumer price index, major transfers to other
levels of government were up $ 0.6 billion, reflecting legislative increases; while direct program expenses declined
by $ 0.2 billion, as lower «other transfer» payments more than offset increases in departmental / agency
operating costs.
You can note that Blackberry's previous
operating system, Blackberry OS 7.1 was approved
by the US and UK
governments for varying
levels of restricted data.
Note that while a travel protection plan, including travel insurance plan, is not required
by Adventure Life, some
government and some
of our third - party suppliers who
operate in remote areas such as the polar regions or safari parks may require proof
of emergency medical benefits and emergency evacuation coverage at certain
levels before you travel.
According to the Alberta Wilderness Association, «Alberta's existing project -
level operating guidelines are woefully inadequate to address cumulative impacts
of industry's footprint, and have been recognized as such
by the Alberta
government and industry via Alberta Caribou Committee work.
A 1996 report
by top military personnel in the U.S., «Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025» to evidentiary details (like governmental spraying schedules, chemical orders, correct nomenclature used in airline
operating manuals, and calls for geoengineering
by economists) to support its notion
of «heavy involvement
of governments at the top
level in climate control projects.»
We say this because the division
of powers part
of the judgement (commencing at para 98) is full
of all sorts
of references to two
levels of government (see e.g. para 141) and similar comments about «interlocking federal and provincial schemes» that make it abundantly clear that this Court has given no thought to the space within which indigenous laws may
operate within the modern constitutional order (for recognition that the law making authority
of aboriginal peoples pre-dated the Crown's acquisition
of sovereignty, was not extinguished
by that acquisition
of sovereignty and was not impaired
by the division
of legislative powers between the federal and provincial
governments in 1982 see Campbell v British Columbia (2000), 189 DLR (4th) 333 (BCSC) and Justice Deschamps in Beckman v Little Salmon / Carmacks First Nation, [2010] 3 SCR 103 at para 97).