Not exact matches
Utah ranks last in the nation in
per - pupil
spending, and Innovations gets the same relative pittance as Salt Lake City's conventional high schools: $ 3,100
per student for
operating costs and $ 3,200 for facilities - related costs.
Most of the private schools at which
students used the CSF scholarships
operate with less than half as much
per - pupil
spending as the public schools.
When they do so, schools are more responsive to their demands and they also
operate more efficiently — delivering higher
student performance
per dollar
spent.
Most of the private schools at which
students used the scholarships
operate with less than half as much
per - pupil
spending as the public schools.
And the district had been
operating under state control since 1995 and receiving court - ordered state aid that pushed its
per student spending to beyond $ 20,000 a year.
Total annual public education
operating expenditures in Texas approximate $ 7,000
per student and aggregate
spending increased by 43 % over the five years ended in 2002, more than twice the sum of enrollment growth and inflation over the same period.
Based on analyses produced by the Benchmark Educational Resource Group, annual public education
operating expenses in Texas approximate $ 7,000
per student, and total
spending increased by over 40 % over the past five years, more than twice the sum of enrollment growth and inflation during that period.
Philadelphia falls in the middle,
spending about $ 13,000
per student to
operate schools, compared with about $ 23,000
per child in Lower Merion, according to state data.
On average, charter schools in Colorado
spend $ 660
per student from designated
per - pupil
operating revenue on facilities costs.
For a district qualifying under this paragraph whose charter school tuition payments exceed 9
per cent of the school district's net school
spending, the board shall only approve an application for the establishment of a commonwealth charter school if an applicant, or a provider with which an applicant proposes to contract, has a record of
operating at least 1 school or similar program that demonstrates academic success and organizational viability and serves
student populations similar to those the proposed school seeks to serve, from the following categories of
students, those: (i) eligible for free lunch; (ii) eligible for reduced price lunch; (iii) that require special education; (iv) limited English - proficient of similar language proficiency level as measured by the Massachusetts English Proficiency Assessment examination; (v) sub-proficient, which shall mean
students who have scored in the «needs improvement», «warning» or «failing» categories on the mathematics or English language arts exams of the Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System for 2 of the past 3 years or as defined by the department using a similar measurement; (vi) who are designated as at risk of dropping out of school based on predictors determined by the department; (vii) who have dropped out of school; or (viii) other at - risk
students who should be targeted to eliminate achievement gaps among different groups of
students.