There are a number of ways to canvass
opinion about climate change issues.
Not exact matches
When I talk to people
about climate change (and the one time that I gave a talk on
climate change at a physics colloquium), I always like to emphasize the fact that I am a PhD physicist who has spent considerable time reading up on the
issue, including many of the actual papers in the peer - reviewed journals, but even with that background I still am not arrogant enough to believe that this qualifies me to have a truly independent
opinion on the subject.
MC: That might be the cause, but on the other hand you look at public
opinion polls
about issues that are of concern to the American public, and
climate change just isn't near the top of those lists, and maybe they made a calculated decision that a more sellable approach would be to focus on energy independence and self - sufficiency, because that's something that people have already bought.
On an
issue like
climate change, LaRouchites represent the extreme fringe of rightwing
opinion, taking the usual conspiracy theories
about grantgrubbing scientists and environmentalist plans for world government into utterly paranoid territory.
Some of the gaps in Chapter 3 on ethical
issues raised by
climate change policy - making include: (1) ethics of decision - making in the face of scientific uncertainty, (2) whether action or non-action of other nations affects a nation's responsibility for
climate change, (3) how to spend limited funds on
climate change adaptation, (4) when politicians may rely on their own uninformed
opinion about climate change science, and (5) who is responsible to for
climate refugees and what are their responsibilities.
The fact is, most people really don't know what the actual
climate change issue is, let alone know a lot of detailed, accurate information
about it, so all these strong «
opinions» — most at odds with the the assertions of the scientists in directly related fields who professionally study this
issue — is another indicator that bias and desire and an enormous host of misinformation drives perception on this
issue.
I have also noted that the message strategy employed in An Inconvenient Truth likely appeals to a base of those already concerned
about climate change and that Gore's visibility on the
issue and political efforts likely have unintended negative consequences relative to public
opinion.
Part of the challenge in creating the incentives for policymakers to take action on
climate change and to address the
issue in a serious way is to accurately communicate
about the nature of public
opinion.
Regarding Nisbet and getting around skeptics, his closing line is «Part of the challenge in creating the incentives for policymakers to take action on
climate change and to address the
issue in a serious way is to accurately communicate
about the nature of public
opinion.»
For polls see e.g., Brett W. Pelham, «Awareness,
opinions about global warming vary worldwide,» Gallup (2009), online here; Leiserowitz et al. (2010b) and other work by Leiserowitz's group; Council on Foreign Relations, «Public
Opinion on Global
Issues» (2011)(no longer available online); Bruce Stokes et al., «Global Concern
about Climate Change, Broad Support for Limiting Emissions,» Pew Research Center, Nov. 5, 2015, online here.
I don't mind scientists having an
opinion about what to do
about climate change issues, e.g., sequestration, nuclear, wind, solar etc..
In this case, your unsupported generalization that «the electorate could not care less»
about climate change was rebutted with actual
opinion polls showing that significant majorities of «the electorate» do, in fact, care a good deal, and consider the
issue a priority for the President and the Congress, and support policies to regulate GHG emissions and to hold fossil fuel corporations responsible for the full costs of their products.
However you feel
about climate change, I think we can all agree there should be a vigorous debate on the
issue, what to do
about it, and without criminalizing people who may have a different
opinion.