Two new polls released over the past two weeks, one from Education Next and one from PDK, shed light on public
opinion about education policy,
Not exact matches
The NASUWT has conducted an annual survey of teacher
opinion since 2011 which highlights the growing concerns of the teacher profession
about the impact of Coalition Government
education policy.
Lisa D. Chong Deputy Editor, Insights
Education: B.A., Cornell University; Ph.D., Yale University Areas of responsibility: General inquiries
about Insights section; perspectives in all biological sciences and biomedicine, social science, economics,
policy, history of science; editorials,
opinions E-Mail:
[email protected]
At the dynamic
Education Fast Forward 12 Debate on January 19, I spoke with Stefan Dercon (Chief Economist Department for International Development in London) and Andreas Schleicher (Special Advisor on
Education Policy OECD in Paris)
about their
opinions on the issues raised in the «Turning School Performance to Economic Success» discussion.
Paul Peterson interviews Robert Shapiro, an expert on public
opinion,
about how the partisan divide in
education policy is shifting, as issues of school quality and accountability have produced «conflicted liberals,» at the same time that the presidential election is creating «conflicted conservatives.»
Founded for students, by students, SFER aims to change public
opinion about what is happening — and what should be happening — in
education, and help to enact
policies that are built for lasting success.
Maureen Downey has written editorials and
opinion pieces
about local, state and federal
education policy since the 1990s.
In addition, he serves on a variety of boards, including as an executive editor of
Education Next, a journal of opinion and research about education policy; and he sits on the boards of Fidelis, inBloom, and the Silicon Scho
Education Next, a journal of
opinion and research
about education policy; and he sits on the boards of Fidelis, inBloom, and the Silicon Scho
education policy; and he sits on the boards of Fidelis, inBloom, and the Silicon Schools Fund.
JSET is a refereed professional journal that presents up - to - date information and
opinions about Issues, research,
policy, and practice related to the use of technology in the field of special
education.
At the HoosierEd blog (a neat one - stop shop for
education policy opinion from the Center of Excellence in Leadership of Learning in Indianapolis), White recently gave an example
about why he wants four of the targeted IPS schools taken off the takeover list, looking at one of the targeted schools, Broad Ripple Magnet High School:
In addition, he serves on a variety of boards, including as an Executive Editor of
Education Next, a journal of opinion and research about education policy; and he sits on the boards of Fidelis, inBloom, and the Silicon Scho
Education Next, a journal of
opinion and research
about education policy; and he sits on the boards of Fidelis, inBloom, and the Silicon Scho
education policy; and he sits on the boards of Fidelis, inBloom, and the Silicon Schools Fund.
Register for LILA now to hear Ravitch's provocative and unfiltered
opinions about the current state of
education reform and the
policy and communications challenges facing educators today.
2.10.2 Intellectual freedom includes: (a) the rights of all Staff to express
opinions about the operation of the University and higher
education policy more generally; (b) the rights of Staff to pursue critical open enquiry and to discuss freely, teach, assess, develop curricula, publish and research within the limits of their professional competence and professional standards; (c) the right to participate in public debates and express
opinions about issues and ideas related to their discipline area; (d) the right of all Staff to participate in professional and representative bodies and to engage in community service without fear of harassment, intimidation or unfair treatment; and (e) the right to express unpopular or controversial views, although this does not mean the right to vilify, harass or intimidate.
This report presents findings on the development of
policies and curricula, including the actors involved and challenges faced; how sexuality
education is taught in classrooms; students» experiences and preferences; support for implementation, including teacher training and school environment factors; sources of SRH information outside of the classroom; and general
opinions about such
education among key stakeholders.
This report presents findings on the development of
policies and curricula, including the actors involved and challenges faced; how sexuality
education is taught in classrooms; students» experiences and preferences; support for implementation, including teacher training and school environment factors; sexuality
education outside of the classroom; and general
opinions about sexuality
education among key stakeholders.
Informants were asked
about their views on current sexuality
education policy;
opinions about the design, structure, coverage and content of the program; experiences implementing sexuality
education in the school system, including how to better support it and challenges faced; perceived sources of support for or opposition to implementation at the national, district and school levels; and monitoring and evaluation frameworks in place.