Sentences with phrase «opinion about global warming»

... We've also participated in a pilot project to measure public opinion about the global warming issue and to see if a factual, science - based public information campaign can have an impact.

Hi my friends, I don't have a definite opinion about Global Warming.

Matthew C. Nisbet, Teresa Myers; The Polls — Trends: Twenty Years of Public Opinion about Global Warming, Public Opinion Quarterly, Volume 71, Issue 3, 1 January 2007, Pages 444 — 470, https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfm031

As I said in my reply to Wegman, ordinarily I would agree with him that science shouldn't be conducted through blogs, but in the case of climate science an opinion about global warming in general, or the validity of multiproxy reconstructions or climate models in particular seems to constitute for some a political viewpoint that must be either trumpeted from the rooftops or suppressed by any means possible regardless of its scientific merit.

«Nobody without a PhD in Radiative Physics is even entitled to have an opinion about Global Warming».

And if the rest of the nation missed the Limbaugh radio ad — assuming it did actually get broadcast time — there's no way on Earth that the campaign would have had any effect on people's opinion about global warming.

These maps offer valuable perspective on geographical differences in opinion about global warming in the United States relative to congressional district, county and state levels.

The portion of Americans with mixed opinions about global warming has declined from 49 percent in 2001 to 36 percent today, according to a Gallup poll released on Earth Day Tuesday.

The governor's office has repeatedly said that Michaels does not represent the state with his opinions about global warming.

For polls see e.g., Brett W. Pelham, «Awareness, opinions about global warming vary worldwide,» Gallup (2009), online here; Leiserowitz et al. (2010b) and other work by Leiserowitz's group; Council on Foreign Relations, «Public Opinion on Global Issues» (2011)(no longer available online); Bruce Stokes et al., «Global Concern about Climate Change, Broad Support for Limiting Emissions,» Pew Research Center, Nov. 5, 2015, online here.

professor's controversial views on global warming could be mistaken for the state's views... The governor's office has repeatedly said that Michaels does not represent the state with his opinions about global warming.»

I've met truckers in bars that have strong opinions about the global warming hoax too.

Not exact matches

I can have differences of opinion with my friends about health care or global warming or eschatology or women in church leadership without taking it personally or holding a grudge.

Most people have strong opinions about politics, religion, global warming, etc..

PEOPLE tend to have strong opinions about geoengineering — large - scale manipulation of the environment to counteract global warming.

Since 2008, Ed has served as Co-Principal Investigator (with Anthony Leiserowitz and Connie Roser - Renouf) of the Yale / George Mason University Climate Change in the American Mind audience research project, which tracks public opinion about climate change, including the Global Warming's Six Americas audience segments.

Then, I saw an opinion piece in The Wall Street Journal of January 27, 2012, by a group of sixteen scientists, entitled «No Need to Panic About Global Warming.»

Opinion polls for the past decade have consistently shown that the public would like to see something done about the global warming problem, along with many other environmental issues.

Fairbourne said he has talked «to a number of meteorologists who have similar opinions» as his, adding that he is concerned about «the extremism that is attached to the global warming.»

Public opinion polls indicate that concern about global warming has been going down, even as the evidence (giant forest fires, drought, floods, record setting hot days etc) becomes so ironclad that it's almost a joke.

Our letter that appeared in the February 14th issue of Science Magazine was motivated by our concerns about the widespread news reports, opinion pieces, and blog postings linking this winter's cold weather over the central and eastern U.S. to global warming.

I don't think that there is anything distinctive about the issues we face with regard to fringe opinions concerning global warming.

beliefs and attitudes about global warming public policy and climate change research on climate change and public opinion Yale Opinion Climate Maps Yale Project on Climate Change Communopinion Yale Opinion Climate Maps Yale Project on Climate Change CommunOpinion Climate Maps Yale Project on Climate Change Communication

But ultimately, the pope's views on climate science will do little to alter the opinions of Catholics about global warming.

The BBC make the link between the decline and global warming by asking the RSPB — which is about as «scientific» as asking someone from the oil industry for their opinion.

Your earlier point about the variability of opinions among skeptics of global warming is a good one.

Global warming believers need only to counter dry recitations of skeptic science material with assertions about the numbers of «IPCC scientists», declare this to be the settled consensus opinion, then claim there is leaked memo evidence proving skeptics are paid industry money to «reposition global warming as theory rather than fact» — hoodwink the public, in other Global warming believers need only to counter dry recitations of skeptic science material with assertions about the numbers of «IPCC scientists», declare this to be the settled consensus opinion, then claim there is leaked memo evidence proving skeptics are paid industry money to «reposition global warming as theory rather than fact» — hoodwink the public, in other global warming as theory rather than fact» — hoodwink the public, in other words.

A few years ago (in 2006, to be precise) I decided that I ought to learn something about this global warming business, about which I had at that time next to no knowledge and of course no opinion at all.

• Gore used opinions of government scientists whose work can not verified • The practice of rainmaking is more art than a science • The practice of stopping global warming is more politics than science • Making rain is local • Stopping warming is global • Rainmakers are positive blaming neither man nor nature for a lack of rain • Warm stoppers are negative blaming humanity for causing warming • Rainmakers do not get paid if they do not produce • Warm stoppers are paid to create alarm about warming

As I've pointed out in other essays, the notion that the whole world is anxious about global warming or climate change is an artefact of the way in which public opinion surveys construct their questions.

If that was not the case, then opinion polls would not be indicating that global warming / scary weather / melting ice would not be about dead last on the list of things that most people are concerned about.

The people of Earth need fresh water and we all need to be more concerned about having more of it, even it takes more energy to make it or having to listen to the fearmongering of Leftist opinion - makers like Obama and Kerry who claim respectively that, «no challenge — poses a greater threat to future generations than climate change,» and, that global warming is, «perhaps the world's most fearsome weapon of mass destruction.»

There seems to be so many contentious and contrary «opinions» about Global Warming due to CO2, how about injecting a little science, math, and logic into the argument.

There's also a graph on p. 40 showing divided opinion about whether individuals can make a difference to global warming, so the disagreement between Milan & Emily seems to reflect a broader split in public opinion.

The Bayesian approach is being used to confirm a controversial preconception — i.e., personal opinions derived from supposed experts — about the causes of global warming.

In their study, more than 1,500 randomly selected Americans were asked about their political worldviews and their opinions about how dangerous global warming and nuclear power are.

Amongst researchers who have actually considered climate change, there is actually a significant range of opinions about man - made global warming theory.

Snyder's opinions about the dangers posed by Climate Change place him among the strident fringe of the Global Warming faithful.

Rutan is one of 16 scientists who appended their signatures to a Wall Street Journal opinion piece titled «No Need to Panic About Global Warming.»

The fateful page was in a routine public opinion poll and proposal for a related campaign of the type that EEI regularly commissioned, this year on public attitudes about global warming.

To point out just a couple of things: — oceans warming slower (or cooling slower) than lands on long - time trends is absolutely normal, because water is more difficult both to warm or to cool (I mean, we require both a bigger heat flow and more time); at the contrary, I see as a non-sense theory (made by some serrist, but don't know who) that oceans are storing up heat, and that suddenly they will release such heat as a positive feedback: or the water warms than no heat can be considered ad «stored» (we have no phase change inside oceans, so no latent heat) or oceans begin to release heat but in the same time they have to cool (because they are losing heat); so, I don't feel strange that in last years land temperatures for some series (NCDC and GISS) can be heating up while oceans are slightly cooling, but I feel strange that they are heating up so much to reverse global trend from slightly negative / stable to slightly positive; but, in the end, all this is not an evidence that lands» warming is led by UHI (but, this effect, I would not exclude it from having a small part in temperature trends for some regional area, but just small); both because, as writtend, it is normal to have waters warming slower than lands, and because lands» temperatures are often measured in a not so precise way (despite they continue to give us a global uncertainity in TT values which is barely the instrumental's one)-- but, to point out, HadCRU and MSU of last years (I mean always 2002 - 2006) follow much better waters» temperatures trend; — metropolis and larger cities temperature trends actually show an increase in UHI effect, but I think the sites are few, and the covered area is very small worldwide, so the global effect is very poor (but it still can be sensible for regional effects); but I would not run out a small warming trend for airport measurements due mainly to three things: increasing jet planes traffic, enlarging airports (then more buildings and more asphalt — if you follow motor sports, or simply live in a town / city, you will know how easy they get very warmer than air during day, and how much it can slow night - time cooling) and overall having airports nearer to cities (if not becoming an area inside the city after some decade of hurban growth, e.g. Milan - Linate); — I found no point about UHI in towns and villages; you will tell me they are not large cities; but, in comparison with 20-40-60 years ago when they were «countryside», many small towns and villages have become part of larger hurban areas (at least in Europe and Asia) so examining just larger cities would not be enough in my opinion to get a full view of UHI effect (still remembering that it has a small global effect: we can say many matters are due to UHI instead of GW, maybe even that a small part of measured GW is due to UHI, and that GW measurements are not so precise to make us able to make good analisyses and predictions, but not that GW is due to UHI).

You may have heard a lot about global warming by now and may have formed your own opinion on this subject.

These events seem to have become a Rorschach test of underlying opinions about the reality of global warming.

The debate about anthropogenic global warming (AGW), in my opinion, is mostly silly.

There is an opinion piece in the Sydney Morning Herald in which Paul Sheehan is impressed by Ian Plimer's new book which suggests that we don't have to worry about global warming.

Its supplemental online interview of the late IPCC scientist Dr Stephen Schneider quoted his opinion about the Global Climate Coalition as being «a coalition of liars and spin doctors to reposition the debate onto the issue of uncertainty, way beyond [what] the scientific community agreed with» (he probably meant to say it was the Western Fuels Association, out to «reposition global warming as theory rather than fact», an error I note at item 17 Global Climate Coalition as being «a coalition of liars and spin doctors to reposition the debate onto the issue of uncertainty, way beyond [what] the scientific community agreed with» (he probably meant to say it was the Western Fuels Association, out to «reposition global warming as theory rather than fact», an error I note at item 17 global warming as theory rather than fact», an error I note at item 17 here).

A new opinion piece in the Wall Street Journal attacks the 97 % scientific consensus on man - made global warming while completely missing the point on what scientists are actually saying about climate change.

May 1989 Gallup poll, worries on various issues: 35 % Great deal about global warming, 28 % Fair amount, 18 % Only a little, 12 % Not at all, 7 % No opinion.

Academic studies find that the single biggest impact on changes in public opinion regarding global warming is what Republican officeholders are saying about it.

A large majority of people in New York believe that global warming is happening because of human activities, and more than two - thirds think that parts of the city will even have to be abandoned over the next 50 years because of rising sea levels, according to survey results released this morning by Columbia and Yale Universities, which called the research the first comprehensive study of opinions from residents of the five boroughs about global warming.