I do like the «no credibility» aspect of the comment, Adam, but the point is that so much public sentiment is based upon commentaries just such as these — in fact, these particular articles where apparently very influential in turning public
opinion against climate science — and now we are seeing retractions.
Not exact matches
5) To what extent is
climate science different than any other research field, or even any other profession, w / r / t the level of «intimidation» people feel about expressing their
opinions when they run
against more prevalent viewpoints within their profession?
As they tend to do from time to time in an effort to distract from the
climate science consensus, a group of scientists who are also
climate «skeptics» have published an
opinion - editorial (op - ed), trying to make the case
against taking action to address
climate change.
Anyone who sees the fiendishly complicated topic of
climate change differently than she does is, in her
opinion, not only ignorant of the facts, but
against science.
While such observations are convenient to use as evidence for already - formed
opinions on the matter, these should not hold as scientific proof for or
against the
climate change
science.