Technorati places far more emphasis than traditional news outlets on
opinion articles because bloggers seem just as likely to link to a firebrand op - ed essay as to a sober wire - service report.
Not exact matches
Because the technology is constantly evolving, any book you read is already outdated; in order to stay on the cutting edge of search engine progress, ensure you continuously update your knowledge by reading
articles (such as this one), staying up to date on new algorithms, analyzing your competitors» successes and failures, and consult expert
opinions and insights.
But if this
article was meant to convey an
opinion (i.e. «We shouldn't export oil
because higher pump prices are an unstoppable evil») then you might as well argue that we shouldn't export ANY goods
because that causes the price of those good to go up at home.
Sure, complain about a somewhat balanced
article that's well put together on a site known for dumb
opinion pieces masquerading as news
articles just
because there's more important things that could be talked about.
You do realize that the entire
article we are commenting on is one long proselytizing piece from a Christian making
opinion claims that the less intelligent may take as fact
because the writer has a background in science.
Should I be accused of hating the guy who wrote this
article just
because I disagree with his
opinion?
They weren't doing those things
because today what it means to be a Christian is to sit on your lazy butt in front of your computer and post comments under news
articles that state your
opinions and put others down with judgement and hatred.
I mentioned this
article by Wink in the first place
because it was so controversial, and revealed a great deal about his opponents in their rebuttals, especially their overall
opinions of Wink.
I say that everyone should disregard this
article,
because it is purely
opinion based, but attempts to present itself as fact.
I wanted to talk to him
because he has an
opinion piece called «Where the Wild Things Were,» in the current issue of Foreign Affairs which is not the place I expected to see an
article about wildlife conservation.
While I endorse this
article's
opinions and am opposed to the death penalty, I must disagree with the editors» statement that «scientific protocols for executions can not be established,
because killing animal subjects for no reason other than to see what kills them best would clearly be unethical.»
Sonic Boom, in my
opinion (
because this entire
article is pretty much my
opinion), was a slap in the face to anyone who actually enjoys the Sonic titles.
Not
because I think the
opinions displayed in the
article are worth the time it takes to write these words, but
because there may be readers who actually believe some of this nonsense.
When you complain about this on message boards and
article posts, excuse me, but stupid people who only do casual reading or fantasy / fiction, think they represent the whole market, are tech experts who should ridicule more sophisticated readers simply
because in their
opinion an ereader is not a tablet.
won't get into dissecting Barber's
article here,
because though she definitely made some valid points about the discrepancies in self - publishing authors» quality, financial situations, marketing versus writing time, etc., it was an
opinion piece based on her traditional publishing experiences (she's not a self - published author currently).
this is my input and closing, i say to all these anti-playbook people to keep a low tone
because the power and potential of the tablet are great and when rim delivers the updates and patches necessary (and up to now they have always delivered) this little tablet will demonstrate is capacity in full and then lots of people will have to edit or ammend their blogs or
articles or invent other stories and lame exfuses for their precipitated slamming of what in my
opinion is a wonderful piece of hardware!
We are providing a link to the MarketWatch
article, «
Opinion: Your five - point investing guide for this aging bull market,»
because it features Heartland Mid Cap Value Fund Portfolio Manager Colin McWey, CFA.
This must be an
opinion article, rather than being based on statistical evidence,
because NONE of my many, many cats ever develop these dire conditions.
There's still plenty of time for Yogscast or Winterkewl to sway my
opinion,
because after all this entire
article is just my
opinion, one written by a guy who was not involved in the project and has no way of knowing what went on behind closed doors past what both companies publicly say.
In the future I'd like to write some more
opinion piece
articles,
because they're always good fun, but it seems I might not be opinionated enough to make them popular.
Noticeably, its depersonalisation procedure seems more in line with the assessment of the AG, particularly
because more data elements are masked (
Article 12 (2) of the Directive, para. 287 of the AG
opinion).
Rather, everyone understands that such practices are de rigueur
because the senior folks are simply way too busy handling other senior - level tasks to undertake the very time - consuming process of researching all of the relevant facts and legal issues pertinent to a judicial
opinion, legal brief, or law journal
article, and crafting all that raw material into persuasive prose.
The
Opinion here is especially noteworthy
because it is the first time the Court had to interpret the last part of
article 3 (2) TFEU which is commonly understood as a codification of the ERTA case - law on exclusive EU external competence.
There are a lot of
opinions about this on the Internet, and I picked Seth Maxon's Slate
article because it's well - written and also
because I agree with him that it's an unneeded change.