100 religious men will give you 100 different points of view and by no means should you let a preacher's
opinion change your point of view.
Not exact matches
My
point is, Google hasn't
changed their
opinion on what «white hat» or «black hat» really is.
The
point is that the laws of a people
change according to the majority
opinions of that people.
Most will
point to some segment of society and declare that we will be a better society if they would
change their views or
opinions.
That has led me to many
changes in my politics and activism and
opinions, how I live out my faith, my marriage and my mothering, my engagement with the Church and community, and all
points between.
I can't say that either of us
changed our
opinion, but that is not the
point of conversations.
But the action of this church's governing council does
point out the ever -
changing body of
opinion with which present - day theologians must deal.
Many of our
opinion leaders make a
point of ignoring the current pope, but he may have sniffed a
change in the eschatological wind far before anyone else.
«Much of the
change in
opinion has occurred over the past few years — support has risen 13
points since 2010,» Pew Research Center says.
If we start this season with those two in our starting 11 it will be a clear sign from this organization that nothing has
changed and that we will never get it right until both Kroenke and Wenger are gone... neither one of these players should still be with our club at this
point because they represent the settling half - measures that have plagued this team for a number of years... this is what I call the «no man's land» of the soccer world, where teams don't have enough talented young players, unlike a Monaco or Dortmund, because they have lost the plot from an organizational standpoint... they are so reliant on one individual to run the whole operation that their once relevant scouting department has become so antiquated that it can no longer find those hidden gems it once had... furthermore, when you leave all decision - making to a manager who despises any dissenting
opinions, your management team becomes little more than a stagnant group of «yes men» and no new ideas emerge... so instead of developing a team with the qualities necessary to excel in a particular system, you continually make half - brain purchases year after year to stifle dissent from the ticket - buying public, then try desperately to finagle together a lineup regardless of what would make positional sense... have you ever heard of a team who plays players out of position so often... of course not because that manager would likely be fired and never work for a team of any consequence ever again
Both teams have had a poor start to the campaign, Chelsea worse so than us but if it is the
opinion of the author that simply because we are 3
points ahead of the champions after 4 games in that «there is little reason to think it will
change any time soon» then I think he is misguided.
nice to see you crawl out of your hole just in time to offer your 2 cents worth once again... unlike yourself I started following this team long before Wenger arrived on the scene and will continue to do so long after he's gone... in his earlier years I admired the cerebral elements he brought to the EPL, which at that
point was more brutish than beautiful, and I respected the seemingly tireless efforts of Arsene, Dein & staff to uncover and develop talent without sacrificing the product on the field... likewise I appreciated that such a youthful manager wasn't afraid to bring strong personalities and / or world - class players into the fold without being fearful of how said players would potentially undermine and / or dilute his authority... unfortunately this all
changed about 10 years ago and culminated in the removal of all our greatest players, both young and old, without any real replacements coming in... from Henry to RVP to Fabergas and Nasri, it was easy to see that this club was no longer interested in competing at the highest levels... instead of being honest, minus the ridiculous claims regarding the new stadium, Wenger chose to side with management and in doing so became the «front man» for this corporation pretending to be a world - class soccer club... without the «front man» this organization would have been exposed numerous years earlier, so his presence was imperative if the facade was to continue... it's for this reason and more that I despise what this once great man and Kroenke has done to my beloved club... the gutless, shameful and manipulative way they have treated the fans, like myself, is largely indefensible and this is why I felt it necessary to start offering my
opinion in a public format... trust me, I resisted the temptation for many years but as long as the same shit continues to exist I will voice my
opinions and if you don't like it maybe you should look for a different team to pretend to follow
All of us are going to have different
opinions on formations and who should start when where etc but i think allot of us would worry for this squad if we tried making big
changes at this
point.
After the Norwich game, when he cost us 3
points, everyone's
opinion changed.
@ Ny Gunner, if i offended you by saying your
opinion is not encouraging fans to believes they can do something, i am sorry no body is an emblem of knowledge here and we are debating for a panel to judge on the best
point mostly we are all right by consensus that we want
changes.
you could have a
point there My dear old dad was having radio therapy last summer and the guy who drove him to his appointments has a 15 year old son in the youth team who quiet freely stated that in the dressing room the rumour is that Theo has lost his bottle and does nt want to injured again.Thing is he was in my
opinion NEVER really that good he is great if he has no time to think about his last touch but give him that extra second and he fluffs his lines continuously He is also really really lazy and he really looks like he just cant be bothered and AW giving him a contract extension AND wage increase just shows how far from reality the
changing room has become.
That said, I do agree on the signings
point — my main argument is that if you believe we need them then an explanation of why and how this would
change the squad would be more enjoyable to read than a simple statement of facts and then an
opinion without analysis.
In 1920, for example, one pediatrician, clearly an advocate of late introduction of solids, called the early feeding of solids («early» being six months at this
point) the new «liberal diet» and registered his
opinion that the «traditional timetable» was still the best for babies.101 Yet by the mid-1920s several doctors were noting in medical journals that, with the relatively recent discovery of «vitamins,» it was necessary to
change an infant's feeding timetable.102
A key requirement of democracy is equal protection of all stakeholders - i.e., if at some
point there is a completely fair vote of 2/3 population preferring the choices advocated and implemented by party A; and 1/3 preferring the choices of party B - then a system must ensure that the minority gets adequate protections and fair treatment; so that while at this moment country gets steered to choice A, the minority doesn't get punished in any way for saying that in their
opinion choice B might be best; and if some of the original voters
change their mind, the choice B can still be known even if the governing clique that was elected on the idea of A wants to continue with A forever.
But as the weeks of campaigning wore on
opinions started to
change, to the
point where it was predicted that Labour would not only hold their 25 seats but take a further two back from the Conservatives.
Others, though,
point to generational
changes in
opinion.
On Monday Len McCluskey, the leader of the Unite union and one of Corbyn's staunchest supporters, suggested the Labour leader and John McDonnell, his shadow chancellor, would feel obliged to step down if there was no
change in
opinion polls currently showing Labour lagging behind by about 12
points.
Trevor Tompson, director of the AP - NORC Center, said the bipartisan agreement on climate
change's existence could be reason to hope for policy action: «Public
opinion around many energy issues tends to be fluid, with people often defaulting to partisan starting
points.
As far as working for a «
change in media coverage,» what is the
point of such a
change if not to influence public
opinion or policy maker action?
In my
opinion, what it does is
change the focal
point.
This game
changed my
opinion on
point click games, this game was based off of the walking dead series and for the most part this is the best story out of the whole walking dead universe.
Instead of documentaries and interviews and the like, the second disc offers an alternate cut of the film, which only runs a few minutes longer but features a different ending that
changes the entire
point of the film... for the better, in my
opinion.
I'm sure if I had refreshed my memory with the theatrical version before watching the director's cut, I could have picked out a few additions, but the
point is that both versions play spectacularly; my
opinion did not
change from the original cut to the new one.
i could go on and on in this argument, but there would be no
point, you like shooters and i like RPGs and in my
opinion monster hunter is one of the best, i don't need to
change your
opinion you can think what you want.
Presentation has never been a focal
point in my
opinion for the Fire Emblem series, but Echoes
changes that in a drastic way.
At first glance, our survey data would seem to confirm those fears: Support for charter schools dropped by 12 percentage
points between 2016 and 2017, the largest
change in
opinion we observed on any item (Figure 1).
In a dramatic
change of
opinion over the past year, support for charter schools has declined by 12 percentage
points, from 51 % last year to only 39 % this year (36 % opposed).
While it has dropped another 4
points to 49 percent in 2015, the modest
change over the past year suggests that
opinion on this issue may be stabilizing.
«But that 12 percentage
point drop,» said Martin R. West of the Harvard Graduate School of Education, «is the largest we see on any survey item between 2016 and 2017, and one of the largest single year
changes in
opinion that we've seen over the 11 - year history of the Education Next survey.»
if that had been the statement, i wouldn't have
pointed out the fallacies, and probably wouldn't have bothered responding, but, if i had, my response would be: «having a bigger sample population doesn't eliminate the horrors of the majority stomping the minority unless the majority happens, by no general virtue of
changing sample size, a more just
opinion.
Persuasive essay writing is about writing a paper to prove a
point of view and to
change the
opinion of the reader.
I could go on and on about it but I can't
change you
opinion... My
point is that tablets are for those who don't want to lug around that 5 pound laptop just to check their Facebook or who want to emerge in a very intuitive multimedia universe...
Ritholtz
pointed to a recent Bloomberg piece saying «hedge funds were betting on Sugar due to dryness» as evidence that portfolio
changes are already being made in relation to climate
change, but this is quite a ways off the mark in our
opinion.
Before I dive into a few of the details from the study, I want to note that my comments about the study are based solely on the news article, as I've been unable to find an actual copy of the study online anywhere — so my
opinions of it may
change if I can ever get a full copy (which should be available at some
point since it has been accepted for publication in the journal Applied Animal Behavior Science).
The most valuable partners in my
opinion are United (which never charges fuel surcharges, allows free date
changes, has flexible routing rules, allows one - way awards, and has dozens of partners to fly on) and Hyatt (where you can stay in incredible hotels that charge $ 1,000 per night with awards as low as 5K and up to a maximum of only 22K
points per night).
In our
opinion, Southwest
points are worth collecting if you frequently fly in the US (or Mexico and Caribbean) especially if you travel with a companion and want flexibility to
change your travel plans.
The
change of pace will be a sticking
point for some players as the game rewards thought out plays and strategy over the run and gun techniques that were so successful in turning the tide in previous entries but in my
opinion this
change is for the better, with matches in the game now playing out in a closer approximation of its real life counterparts.
I own three Xbox360's, love Xbox Live and am disappointed with the XBone, this weekends fiasco has done little to
change my
opinion and the sales of Xbone compared to PS4 kinda prove my
point with many Xbox360 owners moving to Sony.
Studying an artist's work, reading an art critic's
opinion, and looking at recent as well as older artwork to understand how perspectives and
point of views do
change is important.
In my conversation with him yesterday I asked him
point blank if he felt competent to analyse and form an
opinion on climate
change issues.
As far as working for a «
change in media coverage,» what is the
point of such a
change if not to influence public
opinion or policy maker action?
My
opinion has
changed in that I understand better why CO2 can be considered a pollutant and I think that scientists who insist that excess CO2 is a problem have a valid
point.
It is very simple to explain: Since the ACC (anthropomorphic climate
change, aka «Man - caused global warming») is a by a series of cherry - picked data
points represented by constantly flawed and failing models, it was decided to remove the PC motivated
opinion aspect.
As I've
pointed out in other essays, the notion that the whole world is anxious about global warming or climate
change is an artefact of the way in which public
opinion surveys construct their questions.
I guess one could just
point to all the scientific societies that give the same supporting message on climate
change, but maybe that could still be miscontrued by the public as a «top - down»
opinion being pushed by representatives rather than an accurate reflection of the
opinions of individual scientists.