Sentences with phrase «opinion data shows»

While public opinion data shows Americans are now much less prejudiced on the basis of race and sex, and while the crudest forms of such segregation have been eliminated from the American workplace, several studies demonstrate that employment discrimination persists.

Not exact matches

In terms of data, the European Central Bank released its latest monetary policy meeting accounts which showed some divergent opinions withing the bank's board.

Hamori says it's in large part this notion that has prompted career counsellors and opinion leaders to advise employees to maintain an external gaze, with some recommending a switch every 18 to 24 months — despite the fact that the data show otherwise.

No matter how many data points and geo - political analyses and expert opinions and astrological charts we have to work with, history shows we're not very good at predicting the future.

For more Channel 4 News opinion poll coverage - Exclusive poll: economic recovery will not save Labour - Brown poll lead cut to 4 per cent - Poll shows 11 point Labour lead - Feb 2009: «bailout bounce» can't save Brown - Oct 2008: «Churchill effect» for Brown - Nov 2007: poll blames Brown for data fiasco

Data from the 2006 Survey of Earned Doctorates, an annual census of research doctorate recipients conducted by the National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago, show that in 1976, 44 % of doctorate recipients reported that neither of their parents had an education beyond a high school diploma.

«But, contrary to popular opinion, the data from our study show that not all young people are at risk from harmful health - related impacts.

She showed some of her public perception data indicating that regular citizens can make nuanced decisions and formulate sophisticated opinions, although they draw upon a variety of factors to do so including history, trust, controllability, familiarity, being informed, and cultural world views.

He was able to share his opinions about the hottest trends in lighting, user - friendly data acquisition and suspension for those unable to score credentials for the Show.

Your task is to show causal relationship as evidenced by supporting data rather than opinion of your friend.

You are arguing based on your opinion that the evidence is strongly on your side but you still have not answered a single question of mine to show your data to support your claims, nor have you posted any links to support your claims.

It is noteworthy that the consensus hardliners are strongest in the USA, particularly since public opinion there seems to be the most skeptical (an August 2011 Rasmussen poll showed that close to 70 % of respondents believed that climate scientists were fudging the data).

As your salinity question, please show the data and your explanation of what changed abot the earth's rotation to alter the salinity in your opinion.

Unfortunately for Leif there are many studies and much historical data that show a volcano / solar correlation which he so conveniently forgets to mention because it does not fit in with his delusional opinion that there are no solar / climate relationships.

Weather you and I agree or disagree it is totally irrelevant, it is not a matter of the opinion, it is fact that the data from Jault Gire and LeMouel (1990) and later reinforced by Bloxham & Jackson (1992) show that 20 % of the Earth's LOD variability is closely correlated to the sunspot magnetic cycle.

None of the scientific papers that NIWA cited in their impressive - sounding press releases contained the actual adjustments... The main objective of our temperature study was not to show that the raw data has been tampered with, even though that opinion was emphasised and can not yet be excluded.

If they want to add on that it is their opinion that temperatures will rise and the data will eventually show that today's climate is unusual in comparison to the reconstruction that would be fine.

And polls in the USA showed that almost 70 % of respondents were of the opinion that climate scientists «fudged the data».

The good news is that new opinion polling data shows Albertans are firmly behind him in doing so.

> Oh, so you have some data showing you figured out exactly what the «consensus» [contrarian] opinion happens to be,

For example Berlin Dahlem with continuouis data from 1769 and Berlin Templehof with data from 1701 are» corrected» using data from the airports at Tegel, Schonefeld dating from 1953/63 where there was heavy military and civilian airtrafic and Alexanderplatz from 1991 all of which introduce a large UHI effect that shows in the» corrected data as +0.12 C — a seriosu undertimate of the UHI effect in my opinion as Templehof (an airport) already shows an increase over Dahlem (semi rural) of 0.15 C.

In my opinion, the WORST aspect of this is that Judith Curry states unequivocally that «Our data show the pause,» which utterly ignores the extreme level of uncertainty in temperature trends over periods as short as 10 years or less, after she has so often indulged in self - righteous posturing on her own blog about the «uncertainty monster.»

Opinion A new analysis of data from dedicated satellites shows that one of the main factors predicted to drive rising sea levels in future has been seriously overestimated, with major implications for climate talks currently underway in Doha.

Needless to say, the fact that iPhones and many laptops or other devices used for email lack hardline data jacks shows that much of assumptions underpinning these opinions no longer hold up.

If you are going to take an anti-Avvo or LegalZoom approach in the ethics opinions in your state, then you also need to show the data that somehow non-lawyer owned legal service providers are harming the public.

Historically, through a slew of ethics opinions and court challenges, nobody has ever been able to show any data that suggest people have been harmed by lawyer advertising — accurate, misleading or otherwise.

And if LG released an Android Wear app that showed heart rate data from its own Heart Rate Earphones directly on the watch, that too would sway my opinion.

From those who are worried that lending standards are again becoming too lenient (data shows this is untrue), to those who are concerned that prices are again approaching boom peaks because of «irrational exuberance» (this is also untrue as prices are not at peak levels when they are adjusted for inflation), there seems to be no shortage of opinion.