Presence or absence of
opinion evidence from an expert positing (or refuting) a causal link is not determinative of causation.
Today reasons for judgement were released by the BC Supreme Court, Vancouver Registry, discussing this and outlining the parameters of factual vs
opinion evidence from treating physicians.
Did the trial judge err in admitting
opinion evidence from the Police Accident Reconstruction Specialist Detective?
At the Westerhof trial, the trial judge ruled inadmissible
opinion evidence from experts who had not complied with Rule 53.03 including various medical practitioners, a neurologist, and a road safety consultant / driving therapist intern.
There is also reluctance by the Court to admit into evidence expert
opinion evidence from non-traditional medicine experts.
However,
opinion evidence from a fact witness about what it would have done in the hypothetical but - for world was inadmissible.
Utilizing this strategy, prosecutors routinely solicited improper
opinion evidence from the purported expert.
The intervenor put forward
opinion evidence from Laurie Ringaert as an expert in disability studies, in anthropometrics, and in universal design.
Not exact matches
In short, aside
from some potential for a «clearing rally» to correct the short - term oversold condition of the market, even the low advisory bullishness figures provide little
evidence for a «contrary
opinion» call on the market.
«Well aware that the
opinions and belief of men depend not on their own will, but follow involuntarily the
evidence proposed to their minds; that Almighty God hath created the mind free, and manifested his supreme will that free it shall remain by making it altogether insusceptible of restraint; that all attempts to influence it by temporal punishments, or burthens, or by civil incapacitations, tend only to beget habits of hypocrisy and meanness, and are a departure
from the plan of the holy author of our religion, who being lord both of body and mind, yet chose not to propagate it by coercions on either, as was in his Almighty power to do, but to extend it by its influence on reason alone; that the impious presumption of legislators and rulers, civil as well as ecclesiastical, who, being themselves but fallible and uninspired men, have assumed dominion over the faith of others, setting up their own
opinions and modes of thinking as the only true and infallible, and as such endeavoring to impose them on others, hath established and maintained false religions over the greatest part of the world and through all time.»
In some cases,
evidence of past incorrect
opinion is sufficient: The CEO of the software firm Mozilla, Brendan Eich, was hounded
from his post in 2014 for a $ 1,000 contribution to a 2008 California referendum campaign against gay marriage,
evidence of a position he shared at the time with Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton.
many of the similarities between Jesus and the myths are mostly written (added) AFTER Jesus... such as Attis being «crucified» there is much
evidence to show that ATtis died originally
from a spear on a hunting trp... and the crucifixion was added to the story after Christ... as we seen in writings of Greek historians etc. see this page to get more info http://www.tektonics.org/copycat/attis.php this is one of many studies out there to show the supposed similarities between Jesus and myths that debunk current
opinions of those who say Christianity is a copycat of other myths
No genuine Tradition may be disregarded in preference for a logical deduction, and no
opinion put forward by a Mujtahid is acceptable unless it is supported by
evidence from the Qur» an and the Sunnah.
You have to form an
opinion from the
evidence.
Scientists have been able to provide
evidence for the Big Bang Theory, but not the singularity itself that the «big bang» spawned
from... so Hawking's assumptions, are just that, assumptions and
opinions... and he does not, as you say «tell the truth» based on a proven, factual basis.
Well aware that the
opinions and belief of men depend not on their own will, but follow involuntarily the
evidence proposed to their minds, that Almighty God hath created the mind free, and manifested his Supreme will that free it shall remain, by making it altogether insusceptible of restraint: That all attempts to influence it by temporal punishments or burthens, are a departure
from the plan of the holy author of our religion, who being Lord both of body and mind, yet chose not to propagate it by coercions on either, as was in his Almighty power to do, but to extend it by its influence on reason alone.
It is considered politically incorrect and illiberal in Britain to question «gay
opinion» and there is growing
evidence from the Christian Institute and the St Thomas More Legal Centre of the Establishment's intent to censor debate and deny freedom of speech on the issue.
In his book, Principles of Geology, 1830, Charles Lyell (1797 - 1875) burst through the preconceived
opinions that had hindered earlier geologists, and
from the
evidence he had amassed he showed that the earth had been in existence for a far greater period than the Bible allowed for.
Senior BBC journalists have expressed surprise and disbelief when shown the
evidence from the
opinion polls.
At present, much
evidence (including some
from the kinds of
opinion surveys I have just maligned) indicates that religious conservatives and religious liberals in the United States are deeply divided — on nearly everything.
Im 100 % with you —
from what I have seen — the actions of the Browns — the
evidence would point to not only Sashi making the ill fated decisions on the QBs — but also implications that Hue may have had contrary
opinions that were not in anyway final.
It is sad to say that we would be more likely to beat our opposition when playing away
from home, Of course this is purely an
opinion and an
opinion based upon the
evidence seen on a television 1000 miles
from the Emirates.
Washington, DC — A new committee
opinion from The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) addresses the controversy of elective cesarean delivery, using it as an example of how doctors can ethically help patients make decisions about surgical treatment when there is a lack of firm
evidence for or against such surgery.
I want to emphasize that I do not think there is anything wrong with having a personal
opinion or religious viewpoint, just that statements made
from these perspectives should be identified as such so that readers are not mislead into thinking they are reading
evidence when they are reading
opinion or belief.
This is a complex area, and it is commonly difficult to separate
opinion from evidence - based observations.
So tonight I searched for
evidence AGAINST extended breastfeeding and found your article, which is well - written, balanced and just what I was looking for, i.e. an
opinion from someone who seems intelligent, unbiased and trustworthy, and has done the research.
If so, can you back up this assertion, for example by
evidence from opinion polls.
My question is Where does authority come
from in the first place (proove it with factual
evidence not
opinion).
Dr. Talwalkar notes that up to 80 percent of recommendations
from most guidelines are supported by
evidence from non-randomized studies or expert consensus
opinion, making conflict of interest disclosure crucial.
In the face of these controversies, changing our practice of laboratory test monitoring relies not only on
evidence provided by key studies such as this one but may additionally require discussion within the dermatology community and possibly even endorsement or guidelines issued
from key
opinion leaders to gain wide acceptance,» write Eleni Linos, M.D., M.P.H., Dr.PH., of the University of California, San Francisco, and coauthors in a related editorial.
«Our findings give us a substantial boost in shifting the discussion
from expert
opinion to a more
evidence - based conclusion,» he says, «Additionally, they also offer a pragmatic solution that can be applied right away in order to reduce PJK rates.»
But in an
Opinion paper published June 16 in Trends in Cell Biology, researchers propose that new genomic
evidence derived
from a deep - sea vent on the ocean floor suggests that the molecular machinery essential to eukaryotic life was probably borrowed, little by little over time,
from those simpler ancestors.
We say, «Okay, these are the best guidelines that we have, but we're going to need to work with this and try to again collect some
evidence so this is more based on scientific data rather than on particular consensus
opinion, albeit
from experts.»
The latest
evidence of this comes
from a fascinating public
opinion survey by the Los Angeles Times and the American Enterprise Institute, a right - of - center think tank.
Please take note that I am merely sharing my
opinion about ionized alkaline water, which came
from evidence associated with my colleagues, friends, and my own personal experiences.
This single statement concedes,
from the very beginning, the shift away
from an
evidence - based approach in establishing recommendations to one of subjective inference:
opinion.
And I was not dissapointed by how clear cut his
opinion was on the subject... In his article
evidence on nut consumption and human health he goes so far as to call Dr. Esselstyn a reductionist for dissaproving the healthy fats
from nuts and advocado's!
In other words, it is not considered disrespectful for lay people to speak up and reply to posts
from professionals, especially when people are able to support their
opinions with
evidence.
Opinion is not a good basis for professional advice unless it's based on
evidence from thousands of either client outcomes or a research study reviews.
I will just add that if your doctor's advice is not aligned with the
evidence presented here, then get a second
opinion from another doctor.
For their chosen ad, students state a claim about how the ad is misleading and / or unhealthy and then use
evidence from the ad to support their
opinion.
Clear
evidence from other documentary successes, like Al Gore's An Inconvenient Truth, that the movies are a great way to change public
opinion?
• Early Egyptian religion has had a profound impact / Influence on future civilizations Procedure: 1) You will be placed in a group by your instructor 2) you will travel to a station and begin your investigation (15 minutes at each station) 3) In your group you will discuss how religion has affected Egypt Socially, Politically, or economically 4) On your graphic organizer you will provide a theme for your reasoning (single idea / though / word / s) 5) On your graphic organizer you will cite specific
evidence from the sources 6) On your graphic organizer you will discuss how you can connect that information to a historical event / time or a personal connection 7) On your graphic organizer you will write down some of your thought / your inner monologue (thoughts /
opinions / questions / ideas) you had when you were reading 8) You will move onto the next station Focus Question: How did Egyptian Religion affect its civilization / culture as well as future civilizations?
There are guided reading notes for each chapter, guidance for drama activities to develop children's understanding of character, differentiated worksheets to develop inference and justifying
opinions with
evidence and two crosswords to develop the skill of working out the meaning of words
from the context.
They should be able to back up their
opinions with
evidence from text, not merely tell what they think or feel about their reading.
She listened to her students speak about a primary source text: they made connections to their own lives, picked up new ideas
from one another, and drew on
evidence from the text to support their
opinions.
Now more than ever, students need the intellectual power to recognize societal problems; ask good questions and develop robust investigations into them; consider possible solutions and consequences; separate
evidence - based claims
from parochial
opinions; and communicate and act upon what they learn.
As any researcher can immediately note, such surveys have little usefulness as objective
evidence, because they are based on subjective
opinions that can change based on who is working in classrooms, because survey designs can be flawed with leading questions yielding results favorable to the pollster, and because survey designs can change drastically
from year to year.
The cognitive principles of learning are based on reports
from (a) the National Academy of Sciences, 1 (b) a practice guide for teachers by the Institute of Education Sciences in the U.S. Department of Education on Organizing Instruction and Study to Improve Student Learning, 2 (c) and a joint initiative between the Association of Psychological Sciences and the American Psychological Association on Lifelong Learning at Work and at Home.3 The recommendations here reflect the wisdom of these reports, which are based on scientific
evidence, rather than being consensus
opinions of experts.
The emphasis is more on supporting answers by providing
evidence from the text, and less on sharing
opinions.