Sentences with phrase «opinion evidence presented to»

The judge found the medical expert opinion evidence presented to be highly unsatisfactory.

Not exact matches

«Everyone has a different opinion about what the solutions are, but we're presenting evidence that will enable the teams, ourselves and the (governing body) FIA to make the best decisions about the future of F1,» he added.

It is almost impossible to know if Christians would change their thinking if absolute evidence was presented as only one responded, but I would venture to guess that he is probably fairly representative, and no amount of knowledge or evidence would change their opinions.

I have reviewed all the actual evidence for the existence of any god that has been presented to me or that I have found and have formed the opinion, based on the available actual evidence, that the probability of any god existing is very small.

And as I stated previously, Russ, if you had clear evidence, you would be presenting here rather than week after week referring to more written opinion.

No evidence to the contrary presented by realistic theology in the past years seems to disturb modern man's good opinion of himself.

To Tour's credit, at least he dismisses the creationist denial of radiometric dating; however, his opinions, which are targeting an area outside of his actual research area, are worth only as much as the evidence and arguments he presents.

Unless the pardoner presents strong evidence for the pardonee's actual innocence, a pardon tends to convict the recipient in the court of public opinion.

In a 54 - page opinion released Thursday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit wrote that while prosecutors had presented enough evidence to justify Silver's convictions, jurors had been wrongly instructed on the action Silver would have to take to make his conduct count as criminal public corruption.

Based on a true story, Concussion presents not only the interesting story of a medical discovery, but also a study in society's reluctance to accept evidence that runs contrary to popular opinion.

Adult arguments typically evolve alongside a set of coherent rules which involve presenting ideas, weighing evidence, and attempting to sway opinion.

When writing and speaking in class, students are expected to present arguments and provide analysis backed by evidence, not opinion.

Primarily, analytical and critical essays not only focus on the evidences that the writers present in their papers but also discuss the contradictions and viewpoints that are opposite to the writer's subjective opinion.

Conclusion (b) bears no relation to evidence presented in your article and appears to be based either on opinion or on the results of other studies not referred to or referenced here.

For the first time, an Environmental Review Tribunal had defined the measures it deems, based on the evidence and expert opinion presented before it, necessary to protect the species at risk.

I present the evidence as I see it, and I find it offensive that Dr. Hoegh - Guldberg didn't even wait to see what I had to say before stating his opinion.

No one hinders you to study the scientific papers yourself and evaluate the evidence and arguments presented in them, on which those expert opinions in the IPCC Report are formed.

The aim of generating discussion is a weak excuse for making false statements that are presented as your own and genuine opinions, failing to provide evidence for those stts, and refusing to engage when someone provides evidence that those stts are false, with a request for engagement.

«The arguments presented are plausible, but in my opinion the evidence presented is far from conclusive (to put it mildly).»

The opinions on climate change from analysts, researchers, and academics continue to change as the evidence of global warming - or lack thereof - is presented.

Within a few years, after his unprincipled, unsupported and unscientific attacks on climate «sceptics», my opinion had changed, to what it is now, that he's the very model of an unthinking and ill - informed little s ** t. Presenting «evidence» that you haven't checked out yourself is both irresponsible and unscientific, as is accepting «current thinking» or some form of consensus without questioning it in any way.

For two hours, lawyers have the opportunity to present any evidence they'd like to the virtual panel to get their opinions and reactions.

If your claim is denied, you will have to present medical evidence, expert opinions, and legal rationale about why your claim should be approved.

The limited number of LAT decisions rendered to date, provide several examples of accident victims being unsuccessful in their claims because they failed to present sufficient documentary evidence and supporting medical opinions to counter the expert medical opinions which the insurers obtained from their medical specialists.

An expert witness gives hearsay evidence (that is to say, he gives an opinion, not an eye - witness's evidence): necessarily so, because he was not present at the scene of the crime (or, in a civil case, he did not see the events at issue occur).

However, of equal importance, ultimately is an expert having a thorough knowledge of the subject matter forming the basis of their evidence, and also having a propensity to review opinion if presented with information during the process that warrants it, rather than allowing such matters to ultimately undermine an expert's position under cross examination.

Instead «necessity» becomes equivalent to what is likely to assist «efficient determination» of a case: «[47] The advantage of... this rule is that it avoids an over-rigid interpretation of necessity, where a skilled witness is put forward to present relevant factual evidence in an efficient manner rather than to give an opinion explaining the factual evidence of others.

Counsel need to present the expert evidence in ways that allow adjudicators to better assess when an expert is basing an opinion on a set of facts or principles on which there is a strong consensus and when the expert is expressing a minority or dissenting opinion that is not widely supported.

The three analogies: (1) whereas a pre-electronic paper record can be symbolized by a piece of paper in a file drawer, an electronic record is like a drop of water in a pool of water, i.e., it is completely dependent upon its ERMS for its existence, accessibility, and «integrity» (as that word is used in the electronic records provisions of the Evidence Acts; e.g. s. 31.2 (1)(a) CEA); (2) if expert opinion evidence were rendered admissible in the way that electronic records are, there would be no evidence presented, nor cross-examination allowed, as to the qualifications of the expert witnesses, i.e., the «qualifications» of an electronic record being the state of records management of the ERMS in which it is stored; (3) going from a horse - powered transportation system to a motor vehicle - based transportation system has required a vast amount of new laws, regulations, and enforcement personnel, including police officers, judges, and lawyers, i.e., stepping up to a new technology requires that it be controlled by new laws and regulations, otherwise it will cause injury, damage, and inEvidence Acts; e.g. s. 31.2 (1)(a) CEA); (2) if expert opinion evidence were rendered admissible in the way that electronic records are, there would be no evidence presented, nor cross-examination allowed, as to the qualifications of the expert witnesses, i.e., the «qualifications» of an electronic record being the state of records management of the ERMS in which it is stored; (3) going from a horse - powered transportation system to a motor vehicle - based transportation system has required a vast amount of new laws, regulations, and enforcement personnel, including police officers, judges, and lawyers, i.e., stepping up to a new technology requires that it be controlled by new laws and regulations, otherwise it will cause injury, damage, and inevidence were rendered admissible in the way that electronic records are, there would be no evidence presented, nor cross-examination allowed, as to the qualifications of the expert witnesses, i.e., the «qualifications» of an electronic record being the state of records management of the ERMS in which it is stored; (3) going from a horse - powered transportation system to a motor vehicle - based transportation system has required a vast amount of new laws, regulations, and enforcement personnel, including police officers, judges, and lawyers, i.e., stepping up to a new technology requires that it be controlled by new laws and regulations, otherwise it will cause injury, damage, and inevidence presented, nor cross-examination allowed, as to the qualifications of the expert witnesses, i.e., the «qualifications» of an electronic record being the state of records management of the ERMS in which it is stored; (3) going from a horse - powered transportation system to a motor vehicle - based transportation system has required a vast amount of new laws, regulations, and enforcement personnel, including police officers, judges, and lawyers, i.e., stepping up to a new technology requires that it be controlled by new laws and regulations, otherwise it will cause injury, damage, and injustice.

Today, the majority of the court ruled in R. v. Bingley that a DRE's training and experience do make them experts and thus their opinions generally do not need to be further vetted by a judge before it can be presented as evidence in court.

The time and place for coming to your final opinions and speaking about them with your fellow jurors is during deliberations in the jury room, after all of the evidence has been presented, closing arguments have been made, and I have instructed you on the law.

This is important because I can present evidence to the prosecutor before he or she has formed an opinion about the case.

14 Rule 13 - 3 (2) of the Supreme Court Family Rules provides that any party who wishes to present to the Court expert opinion evidence on a financial issue (defined in Rule 13 - 3 (1) as an issue arising out of a claim under Part 5 or Part 6 of the Family Law Act, SBC 2011, c 25), that evidence must be presented to the Court by means of a jointly appointed expert unless the Court otherwise orders or the parties otherwise agree and Rule 13 - 4 applies.

This one day course will provide expert witnesses with the core skills to effectively present opinion based evidence in court under cross-examination.

Last month, an appellate court in Michigan issued an opinion in a premises liability case, finding that the trial court was correct in granting summary judgment to the defendant, due to the plaintiff's failure to present evidence of a required element of her claim.

It further discussed the fact that the plaintiff still had other evidence to present and had been aware that she would have to present opinion testimony with regard to establishing causation.

Panelists will discuss the VLO Opinion as well as other recent opinions covering business arrangements with non-legal organizations, the duty to correct false evidence presented to a tribunal, and more.

Attorney Tamsin Allen laid out the evidence supporting the claims during a news conference in London, presenting journalists with printouts of electronic message exchanges, photos and a legal opinion presented to Britain's Electoral Commission.

So long as the Court, in hearing and determining applications such as the present one, is bound by the rules of evidence, as the Parliament has stipulated in s82 (1) of the [Native Title Act 1993 (Cth)-RSB-, the requirements of s7933 (and s5634 as to relevance) of the [Evidence Act 1995 (Cth)-RSB- are determinative in relation to the admissibility of expert opinion evievidence, as the Parliament has stipulated in s82 (1) of the [Native Title Act 1993 (Cth)-RSB-, the requirements of s7933 (and s5634 as to relevance) of the [Evidence Act 1995 (Cth)-RSB- are determinative in relation to the admissibility of expert opinion eviEvidence Act 1995 (Cth)-RSB- are determinative in relation to the admissibility of expert opinion evidenceevidence.35

If it is passed [26], evidence of the existence or content of traditional law and custom in courts will be able to be presented without breaching the hearsay rule or the opinion evidence rule.