Sentences with phrase «opinion evidence right»

Not exact matches

While the board's opinion could one day change, Polman is right about one thing: There is ample evidence to suggest that companies that focus on long - term sustainability outperform those with a shorter - term outlook.

Too often, we do foolish things, like speak before we think, form ideas we have little or no evidence to support, fail to consider other thoughts or opinions and assume we're always right.

if you can lie to yourself with immunity, you might be an atheist if you think the indifferent support your side, you might be an atheist if you don't think at all, you might be an atheist if you are drawn to religious discussions thinking someone wants to hear your opinion, you might be an atheist if you copy paste every piece of crap theory you find, you might be an atheist if you think you are right no matter what the evidence shows, you might be an atheist if you can't hold your water when you think about science, you might be an atheist if you can't write the word God, with proper capitalization, you might be an atheist if you think your view has enough support to be a percentage of the seven billion people on earth, you might be an atheist if you think The View has enough support to be a percentage of the seven billion people on earth, you might be an atheist if you live in a tar paper shack, writing manifestos, you might be an atheist if you think you're basically a good person, and your own final authority you might be an atheist if you think your great aunt Tillie was a simian, you might be an atheist if you own an autographed copy of Origin Of The Species, you might be an atheist if you think that when you die you're worm food, you might be an atheist if you think the sun rises and sets for you alone, you might be an atheist if all you can think about is Charles Darwin when you're with your significant other, you might be an atheist if all you can think about is you when you're with your significant other, you might be an atheist if you attend a church but palm the offering plate when it passes, you might be an atheist If think this exhausts all the possibilities of definition, you might be an atheist.

The atheist's perspective is that there is insufficient evidence to reasonably believe in a deity but reserve the right to change their opinion if such evience is provided.

Although there's plenty of room for differing opinions in the Christian faith, this film is one more piece of evidence that wherever you land, believers can no longer sit on the sidelines when it comes to issues of race, civil rights and how we interpret our past.

You have no evidence that you are right, and working so hard to try to offend people (just because they happen to have a different opinion than yours) is not a good way to live.

Right, so if you really want my opinion about if an all - powerful benevolent god exists, I think the evidence is clearly in — certainly not.

If, in the Sponsor's opinion, there is any suspected or actual evidence of electronic or non-electronic tampering with any portion of the Promotion, or if computer virus, bugs, unauthorized intervention, fraud, or technical difficulties or failures compromise or corrupt or affect the administration, integrity, security, fairness, or proper conduct of the Promotion, the Sponsor reserves the right at their sole discretion to disqualify any individual who tampers with the entry process and void any entries submitted fraudulently, to modify or suspend the Promotion, or to terminate the Promotion and conduct a random drawing to award the prizes using all eligible, non-suspect entries received as of the termination date.

«Our findings give us a substantial boost in shifting the discussion from expert opinion to a more evidence - based conclusion,» he says, «Additionally, they also offer a pragmatic solution that can be applied right away in order to reduce PJK rates.»

The latest evidence of this comes from a fascinating public opinion survey by the Los Angeles Times and the American Enterprise Institute, a right - of - center think tank.

Journals need to protect the rights of people to express opinions and debate the evidence while being steadfast in not allowing facts to be misrepresented.

The need to be right, the possibility of asserting one's «rightness» about a complex topic pushes many assert X, Y, or Z is true with inadequate evidence and to experience helpful, but contradictory, information or opinion as an attack.

If for any reason, the promotion is not capable of running as planned, including without limitation, any suspected evidence of tampering or technological corruption or if any portion of the contest is compromised by virus, bugs, worms or unauthorized human intervention, fraud, acts of God, strikes, terrorist acts, criminal acts of third parties, an insufficient number of qualified entries, or any other causes beyond Vital Essentials ®» control which, in Vital Essentials ®» sole opinion, corrupts, threatens or impairs the administration, security, fairness, integrity, or proper conduct of the promotion, Vital Essentials ® reserves the right to cancel, terminate, modify or suspend the drawing at their sole discretion.

Certainly everyone has a right to an opinion, but that opinion is worthless without supporting evidence.

To feel right based on opinion or be right based on evidence.

The strongest evidence for a distinction between left - leaning and right - leaning newspapers can be found in the opinion pages in France, the UK and the USA, where right - leaning newspapers are much more likely to include uncontested skeptical voices.

Theory is wonderful, so too positive thinking, as are thought bubbles and assumptions without solid evidence to support them bar an «opinion'that well «it feels right to me.»

In common with the right - wing contrarians, Cockburn's opinions are not formed from a dispassionate look at the evidence, but come from a post hoc reasoning given his dislike of the purported implications.

Populist opinion might be outraged by the proposition that a convicted murderer in prison should have the right in prison to artificial insemination facilities, and for some this might appear the thin end of the wedge of unelected judges bestowing preposterous rights on a category of undeserving citizens, but others would welcome this decision as being tangible evidence of an enlightened ECtHR in action, vigorously championing human rights for all.

There's some circumstantial evidence that Justice Stevens was writing the majority opinion in Dale that would have held that the Boy Scouts did not have a First Amendment free association right to exclude gay scoutmasters, but lost the majority opinion to Chief Justice Rehnquist after one of the Associate Justices changed his or her vote.

Whether or not one treats the majority opinion's public forum analysis of social networks as «dicta» (which is legalese for «stuff in an opinion I don't like so I don't consider binding»), all 8 Supreme Court justices agreed that subscribers have a First Amendment right to access information and speak online, and that the government can not prohibit a person from accessing content that has nothing to do with preventing repeat offenses — even when the repeat offense is child molestation, and the evidence arguably supported that child molesters were particularly prone to repetition.

The requirement is (i) quite clearly contrary to my rights under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, (ii) in my opinion, ultra vires the powers of the Law Society, (iii) contrary to, and indeed ignorant of, the role and function of a lawyer in a liberal democracy, (iv) the result of political ideology, rather than any evidence - based process, and (v) deeply offensive to me personally in terms of its clear implication that I and my profession and society are rrights under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, (ii) in my opinion, ultra vires the powers of the Law Society, (iii) contrary to, and indeed ignorant of, the role and function of a lawyer in a liberal democracy, (iv) the result of political ideology, rather than any evidence - based process, and (v) deeply offensive to me personally in terms of its clear implication that I and my profession and society are rRights and Freedoms, (ii) in my opinion, ultra vires the powers of the Law Society, (iii) contrary to, and indeed ignorant of, the role and function of a lawyer in a liberal democracy, (iv) the result of political ideology, rather than any evidence - based process, and (v) deeply offensive to me personally in terms of its clear implication that I and my profession and society are racist.

Minister Ahern has introduced a law which a large number of our leading criminal lawyers have said is unnecessary, probably unconstitutional, will «jettison ancient rights and rules of evidence» and has been introduced «without any research to support its desirability and without canvassing expert opinion or inviting contribution from interested parties».

Workers Comp Is A Right campaign key demand addresses serious problems with the way the WSIB considers medical evidence and ignores treating health professionals» opinions...

Capias Capias Mittimus CAPTA (Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act) Caption Case Management Cause of Action CEJ (Continuing Exclusive Jurisdiction) Central Authority Certification Certified Divorce Financial Analyst Cestui Que Trust Charge to Jury Child Abduction Child Abuse and Neglect Child Representative Child Support Enforcement Child Support Guidelines Child Support Payment Children's Rights Circuit Court Citation Civil Code Civil Contempt Civil Law Civil Liberties Civil Rights Civil Union Clear and Convincing Evidence Classifications of Law Clerk of the Court COBRA (Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act) Codicil Cohabitation COLA (Cost of Living Adjustment) Collaborative Divorce Collaborative Law Commencement of Action Common Law Common Law Marriage Community Property Competency Complainant Complaint for Divorce Concurring Opinion Condonation Confidential Privilege Conflict of Interest Conjugal Rights Consanguinity Consent Order Conservator Consolidation Constitution Contemnor Contempt of Court Contested Divorce Contingency Fee Continuance Contract Co-Respondent Corroborative Witness Cost Analysis Counsel Counseling Count Counterclaim Court Court Costs Court of Equity Court Order Court Reporter Court Services Officer Covenant Marriage Coverture CRC (Children's Rights Council) Criminal Contempt Cross-Examination Cruel and Abusive Treatment CSRA (Child Support Recovery Act) Custodial Parent Custody Custody Affidavit Custody Evaluation Custody Preference