The outcome often comes down to the subjective
opinion of a particular judge on a case - by - case basis.
Not exact matches
Instead, the Word
of the Year is chosen because, in the
opinion of Oxford Dictionaries» lexicographers and consultants, it is «
judged to reflect the ethos, mood, or preoccupations
of that
particular year and to have lasting potential as a word
of cultural significance.»
But all
of this only reinforces my
opinion that you should not condemn or
judge a
particular people group unless you are friends with someone from that people group (which then makes it nearly impossible to
judge and condemn them).
In a withering
opinion,
Judge Rolf M. Treu essentially blamed the unions for depriving minority children, in
particular,
of a quality education by shielding incompetent teachers from dismissal.
In addition to training externs and clerks, an upper - level class in judicial
opinion writing provides an opportunity for students to hone their skills in writing for a
particular audience, structuring and organizing, analyzing, and using rhetorical devices introduced during the first - year writing course through a different type
of document.6 Such a course can cause students to look at the legal process from a different perspective and to become better critical readers and users
of opinions by writing them.7 Thus, other goals
of a judicial
opinion writing course can include learning about the audiences
of judicial
opinions and the perspective
judges bring to their
opinion writing.
As noted in The Logical Relevance
of Expert Scientific
Opinion (at p. 46), the Mohan and Abbey criterion
of logical relevance requires
judges to evaluate scientific relevance with respect to a
particular scientific hypothesis.
In Wilson v Her Majesty's Advocate 2009 JC 336, which also concerned
opinion evidence, the High Court
of Justiciary, in an
opinion delivered by Lord Wheatley, stated the test thus (at para 58): «[T] he subject - matter under discussion must be necessary for the proper resolution
of the dispute, and be such that a
judge or jury without instruction or advice in the
particular area
of knowledge or experience would be unable to reach a sound conclusion without the help
of a witness who had such specialised knowledge or experience.»
As
Judge Posner and Professors Epstein and Landes suggested in The Behavior
of Federal
Judges, computerized sentiment analysis of the content of judicial opinions could produce more nuanced insights about particular judges» attitudes and ide
Judges, computerized sentiment analysis
of the content
of judicial
opinions could produce more nuanced insights about
particular judges» attitudes and ide
judges» attitudes and ideology.
Other than KRE 614, Lawson's observation
of the practice, and the Slaughter case, there was not much in the way
of modern case law or authority in Kentucky to instruct trial
judges and litigators on any
particular procedural or substantive considerations for allowing juror questions, until the Kentucky Supreme Court issued its
opinion in Fraser v. Miller, 427 S.W. 3d 182 (Ky. 2014).
Because this Formal Advisory
Opinion does not address the specific facts
of a
particular case, a
judge does not receive the benefit
of the «rule
of reliance» by reviewing the Committee's general advice.