Did you make decisions based upon what was a popular
opinion of others rather than those closest to you?
Not exact matches
As she continues to read, we hear about Paul's incarceration and persecution, about how Jesus is «the image
of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation,» about watching out for all those false teachings that circulated through the trade routes, about how we ought to stop judging each
other over differences
of opinion regarding religious festivals and food (I blush a little at this point and resolved to make peace with some
rather opinionated friends before the next sacred meal), about how we should clothe ourselves with compassion, kindness, humility, gentleness, and patience, and love, about how we must forgive one another, about how the things that once separated Jew from Greek and slave from free are broken down at the foot
of the cross, about how we should sing more hymns.
This third option takes a lot
of hard work and much more FAITH than the
other 2 options, but in my
opinion, is well worth it to strive for,
rather than a. completely giving up your reason and subjecting it to the limits
of the Bible, or b. completely giving up on a faith that you hold and that is an integral part
of you.
It sadly is Sue, we have a divided fan base, an majority shareholder who is (in my
opinion) using our clubs assets to secure lending on his
other sporting investments, a board who quite frankly see us fans as customers
rather than supporters as shown by the chairman's AGMs performance, players who aren't signing new contracts, if you cut Ian Wright and
others open you'd see cannons in their blood with some
of our players now you'd find image rights and pound signs.
wenger is a legend in his own mind so
other peoples
opinions... fans, ex players, journalists, etc... have no bearing on his greatness or the righteousness
of his own decisions... from end
of last season it was clear we needed two quality attacking options to put up a serious challenge (getting rid
of walcott and campbell or ox and bringing in a serious upgrade over giroud) instead he brought in another midfield option (having done the same in the winter window) which only makes sense in his own delusional world
rather than the reality
of facing up to serious and strengthening competitors and which defines the job at hand....
Alexis in his second season after a freakishly brilliant start, Ozil coming in to consistent form at the end
of his second season, Coq now with a proper body
of work under his belt and a whole summer to work on it, Bellerin with his first season jitters out
of his system, Giroud finally realising he might be a pretty decent striker, Gab with some solid performances and the close - season to bond further, Monreal maturing in to an unspectacular but tremendously solid FB, Ospina settled — it is my
opinion that these and
others will be what will bring the bigger improvements and the consistency needed next year
rather than any wholesale changes.
A child misbehaving (acting foolishly) = (perception) that parents aren't correcting child and A child misbehaving (acting foolishly) = judgment not from God (the only One equipped to judge) but from
others in faith community and Judgment from
others = not good feeling then not good feeling = fear
of other's assessment
of parenting choices and then fear
of opinions of others = parenting from a place
of fear
of man
rather than leadership from God through His Word and the movement
of His Spirit within
Breastfeeding USA Counselors must be comfortable promoting evidence - based information (which means it may not be a good fit for those who strictly follow parenting programs based on the latest trend or one person's
opinion), but mothers
of all persuasions can learn to help
other mothers breastfeed, making it inclusive
rather than exclusive.
He said «you must let your intelligent
opinions be heard on issues concerning the elections instead
of rather fighting each
other as political opponents.
Even if patients» reviews rate treatments with a star system
rather than including quantified measures
of some kind, those
opinions become powerful hearsay evidence for
other patients, Ioannidis suspects.
For those interested in who holds various views on climate, or
other matters, can be held by a populace, the chapter on «Computer Simulations
of Opinions and their Reactions to Extreme Events» will be illuminating, with some conclusions I found
rather surprising.
This is not just a safer and more private way
of approaching online dating, but also much more natural in that you both start a relationship by learning each
other's likes, dislikes,
opinions, and views,
rather than a very contrived and acted - out version
of what normally passes for dating.
But these quickly become virtual dumping grounds for
opinions rather than spaces for reacting and responding to the ideas
of others in real time.
And, finally, integrating schools by income
rather than race allows schools and districts to move beyond the negative public
opinion of so - called forced bussing and
other racially charged policies
of the past.
Actually, it is
rather difficult to back up your
opinion so that
others would have no doubts that your point
of view is better than someone else's.
I too am not taking sides, but your
opinion on promising something and not actually agreeing to certain features (Which a lot
of other people defending the game seem to also state), is
rather naïve.
I'll stick to watching things and deciding from myself
rather than blindly following the
opinions of others.
Like Peeled Paint's social - consciousness narrative, my series Embrace Your Essence produced in 2015 focused on young women's journeys toward self - love — defining what they find beautiful about themselves,
rather than from the
opinions of others.
Rather than use emotive terms, instead
of being dismissive
of others opinions and
of others information and suggestions, and to see that it is quite acceptable and reasonable to present conjectures (as opposed to the incorrect semantics
of the word «speculate») seems to me to be a more positive, embracing, and open minded approach to take.
I'd
rather try to understand what's happening to our planet and have the flexibility to look at
other peoples
opinions and give them the benefit
of the doubt.
For those interested in who holds various views on climate, or
other matters, can be held by a populace, the chapter on «Computer Simulations
of Opinions and their Reactions to Extreme Events» will be illuminating, with some conclusions I found
rather surprising.
Global warming believers need only to counter dry recitations
of skeptic science material with assertions about the numbers
of «IPCC scientists», declare this to be the settled consensus
opinion, then claim there is leaked memo evidence proving skeptics are paid industry money to «reposition global warming as theory
rather than fact» — hoodwink the public, in
other words.
In the interests
of remaining on topic, I'll just note (as many
others have) that public policy decisions are driven by the information available, that on complex subjects we depend upon expert
opinion, and that due to some
rather serious efforts by «skeptics» there is a gap between the expert
opinion and the public perception
of the same.
A comment to CB: Your sentence beginning «
Rather than assuming the worst about people and their motives...» applies to both sides
of this debate, who hold strong and probably mistaken
opinions of the
other side.
I would request the authors to come out with their carefully considered
opinion of the review process itself perhaps at a later point, so it can serve as a guide to
others,
rather than forget all about it in the joy
of publication.
The train
of thought which changes some melt and distant future into total melt very soon is interesting, because it, in my
opinion, is caused much by journalists who affect the
opinion of other journalists,
rather than the progress
of science itself.
While Maibach's formulation may be the most compelling one, it would be fraudulent to use it without evidence that all 97 %
of climate scientists based their
opinions on their own independent evaluation
of the evidence,
rather than on the
opinions of other climate scientists whom they trusted.
Rather, everyone understands that such practices are de rigueur because the senior folks are simply way too busy handling
other senior - level tasks to undertake the very time - consuming process
of researching all
of the relevant facts and legal issues pertinent to a judicial
opinion, legal brief, or law journal article, and crafting all that raw material into persuasive prose.
However, the maximization
of cost - savings is obtained by having such a support service provide full legal
opinions,
rather than merely enabling lawyers to download memoranda and
other materials from an online catalogue.
For that reason as well, some commenters criticized the study for attributing the difference in
opinion quality between appointed and elected judges to number
of opinions written
rather than
other factors.
«There seems to me to be room to question whether the ordinary rules
of client privilege, appropriate enough in
other circumstances, should apply to a law officer's
opinion on the lawfulness
of war; it is not unrealistic in my view to regard the public, those who are to fight and perhaps die,
rather than the government, as the client.»
Instead «necessity» becomes equivalent to what is likely to assist «efficient determination»
of a case: «[47] The advantage
of... this rule is that it avoids an over-rigid interpretation
of necessity, where a skilled witness is put forward to present relevant factual evidence in an efficient manner
rather than to give an
opinion explaining the factual evidence
of others.
· The correct judicial response to the question
of the admissibility
of hearsay evidence in an expert
opinion is not to withdraw the evidence from the trier
of fact unless,
of course, there are some
other factors at play such that it will be prejudicial to one party, but
rather to address the weight
of the
opinion and the reliability
of the hearsay in an appropriate self - instruction or instruction to a jury.
Today the Court granted certiorari to Harrington v. Richter, an ineffective assistance
of counsel case challenging the issuance
of habeas corpus relief by the Ninth Circuit based upon counsel's reliance on cross-examination and
other methods to create reasonable doubt about the defendant's guilt
rather than expert -
opinion testimony.
The only concession it makes on the phone side, in our
opinion, is that it only features a 720p Super AMOLED display
rather than a Full HD one, but at 4.8 - inches, it's plenty big enough and represents a lot
of real estate if you consider it against similarly pitched compact cameras, let alone
other phones.
Bhai RGB is the pixel arrangement
of the sensor and telephoto is the type
of lens both are different things... Your question should
rather be whether Both sensors as RGB or One RGB and
other monochrome, in my
opinion the underlying technology is same.
In my
opinion, it's a mixture
of both reasons; as we saw before people tend to look directly into bitcoin when they start their cryptocurrency journey, but at the same time no
other cryptocurrency,
rather than bitcoin, has won so many battles coming always on top.
Note: You must ensure that the need
of change comes from within,
rather than by
opinions of other people.
Help children and young people understand that self - worth comes from the inside
rather than from «things» or the
opinions of others.
«
Rather than blaming the
other person for all the things they did wrong in your
opinion or the ways in which they did not meet your needs, it's better to be less judgmental and frame it in terms
of what was and wasn't working for you,» Gold says.
Time to consider which side
of your bread is being buttered, and by who, and it ain't the up - side by first - class professionals, but
rather, it is predominantly the dark underside by here - today - gone - tomorrow realturds and / or long - term learned - the - ropes realturds (playing along with the industry - centric rules against slagging
other realturds), not to mention too many low - life - ignoring realturd - supporting self - serving ASSociation officials living off
of realturds» dues - dollars (
of which there are many more than non-realturds» dues dollars in my
opinion), and that, my friend, is the problem that Chris and many
others within ORE have not only recognized, but who have the gonads to break ranks with the devil that they know and rightfully kick sand in its face.
It obligated members (who wouldn't be known as REALTORS ® until 1916) to «be absolutely honest, truthful, faithful and efficient»; to «obtain sole agency, in writing»; to «respect the listings
of his brother agent, and to co-operate with him to sell»; to «advise an owner to renew a selling contract with some
other agent,
rather than solicit the agency»; to «always speak kindly
of competitors»; to «always be loyal, square, frank and earnest in matters that require the co-operation
of other brokers»; to «advertise nothing but facts»; and to «give an honest
opinion concerning a competitor's proposition when asked to do so by a prospective purchaser, even though such
opinion will result in a sale by the competitor.»