Sentences with phrase «opinion on all issues not»

Not exact matches

While it's still unclear if Session's views will translate into changes in policy or enforcement, this attitude shift at the federal level doesn't align with public opinion on the issue.

Judge Amy Berman Jackson of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia has not yet issued an opinion on the case.

Haskayne's opinions don't sit well with right - wing pundits, who call his book on the issue (Northern Tigers, Building Ethical Canadian Corporate Champions) a «manifesto.»

But environmentalists released their own poll this week suggesting most Americans don't really have a strong opinion on the issue, and would rather see Congress move on to other things.

ARI is a national, not - for - profit, non-partisan public opinion research foundation established to advance education by commissioning, conducting and disseminating to the public accessible and impartial statistical data, research and policy analysis on economics, political science, philanthropy, public administration, domestic and international affairs and other socio - economic issues of importance to Canada and its world.

When investors act on a bias, they do not explore the full issue and can be ignorant to evidence that contradicts their initial opinions.

Read the ferociously anti-slavery Orestes Brownson, who remarked that the issue of secession was not clearly enough resolved by the Constitution of 1787 for us to say that there's no place for seeing a legitimate difference of opinion that would one day have to be resolved on the battlefield.

The Catholic Church's position on artificial birth control has NO basis in the teachings of Christ... it was not an issue then... the teaching is solely based on the opinion of the men running the church who claim «divine inspiration»... BULL... they wanted people to have more kids so they could contribute more money to the church so that the so - called «princes of the church» could maintain their princely life - style.

Thank you Karalen for a very for a very insightful opinion on this age old controversy that in the 21st century should not be an issue.

In my opinion, being agnostic on many things, I believe we have much more to learn in Dawkins» area of expertise before we can really get to an educated answer to the issue, but that is just a gut feeling, but with serious consideration to what we don't actually know on the issue from these fields of science.

The LDS church has no doctrine or opinion on any issue that might be called political, with the exception of gay marriage, which they do not support.

If you've ever been persuaded to change your opinion on a «belief» issue as a result of a CNN forum, please click on «Like»... bet there aren't any or many clicks!!

On May 10 George Bush issued a further opinion — that the CIA «should not be precluded» from using part - time journalists who want to cooperate with the agency.

comment on the issue and don't shout out your opinions without any grounds to support it.

the author doesn't say that one can't have an opinion on an issue just because the bible doesn't have a clear stance on it... he's simply saying that it doesn't make sense to have such a strong, skewed and one sided stance on an issue that the bible isn't clear about.

Now, even though I am not of an opinion on this issue please do not feel that your interpretation of the Separation of Church from the state is universally agreed upon.

I know, its the cowards way out but I just do not know because civil unions many folks agree with but folks having issues with using the term «marriage», I can see both sides to a point that I am stumped on an opinion.

in my opinion makes theology very frustrating to me, it seems that the Bible is not cut and dry on these issue, and it really bothers me

Why not form an opinion totally based on how you «feel» or your «emotions» and justify your argument on why you feel that way, rather than saying «for the bible tells me so»... That's why we can't move forward on issues in this country; people feel they can't express themselves without the safety of a group's opinion... Let's listen to ourselves for once instead of having your daddy's politics and religion handed down to you like a family asset.

Alston (departing from Aquinas who, and not alone in my opinion, is terribly equivocal on this issue) says that God wills that creatures shall have freedom, so that their decisions are made possible, but not fully determined, by God.

On many of the contemporary, moral issues formal expertise does not dictate rightness or wrongness, for everyone has opinions and convictions and subjective attitudes, involvement, and fears.

If I have a relationship with the God who the Bible tells us about, if I believe He knew me before I was born and if I believe that He is with me even now, whether or not Paul's advice and Joshua's actions were based on their opinions or a directive from God is not much of an issue for me.

Please, if you haven't studied an issue beyond reading partisan websites on the internet, you have no place holding an opinion about the issue.

For example, in 1994 the Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs of the American Medical Association issued an opinion holding that it is «ethically permissible» to use «the anencephalic neonate» as an organ donor, even though, as the Council recognized, under current law anencephalic babies are not dead.

And, as you mention, the variety of opinion on this issue strongly suggests that one can not know for sure by any objective means.

Harrison also unfolds Augustine's insightful contribution to the science — religion debate, drawing out a number of valuable principles — not least, recommending restraint where issues are not clear, and avoiding bringing Christianity into contempt by arguing for false scientific opinions on the supposed grounds of scriptural warrant.

I don't think of Alise's belief as denial so much as a difference of opinion, akin to taking opposite sides on a political issue.

However, his book is not a contention for this position; it is an argument that the General Synod, rather than advocating an orthopraxis, should recognize that Christians may reasonably hold diverse opinions on such issues.

Not only does Bob not seem to understand the courts» duties, but he seems to ignore that public opinion on this issue is in fact changing more rapidly day by dNot only does Bob not seem to understand the courts» duties, but he seems to ignore that public opinion on this issue is in fact changing more rapidly day by dnot seem to understand the courts» duties, but he seems to ignore that public opinion on this issue is in fact changing more rapidly day by day.

On this issue, Bob assumes that the courts may wind up harming and not representing the prevailing general public opinion.

I do not hold an opinion on this issue but to ask from the sidelines if what you declare that Gays and Lesbians want are the rights then if Civil Unions which would give all of the rights and benefits to Gay and Lesbian couples in all matters, would you accept this and drop the desire for the term «marriage» to be used.

Norman, sorry if you feel all Christians carry the same view but as I stated...» I do not hold an opinion on this issue».

It seems that when teams of doorstep canvassers are sent out to chat with thousands of residents about same - sex marriage, swift and durable change occurs in the opinions on that issue held by subjects who chatted with a gay canvasser whose script told him to say that he'd really like to get married but the law won't allow it.

Sharing our opinion on an issue isn't necessarily a bad thing, but sometimes, when we are trying to be a voice for those who are suffering, we end up speaking over them, shouting our own view without first really stopping to listen to their experiences.

We know that television informs us, a genuine window on the world, but also that its commercial demand for profit severely limits the amount of diversity of opinion that is aired, that it tends to trivialize issues and to represent the views of the rich, so that through TV the average citizen simply can not get the information needed to make intelligent decisions about living in our democracy.

While I have opinions on all of these issues, I am not sure that most of them really matter.

Anyone can express their opinions but again, if one is not knowledgeable and educated on the subject or issue then it is invalid.

This opinion is not compatible with the Pope's teaching, especially in view of his citation from the document of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Donum Vitae (1974), but there may still be some room for further discussion on technical issues of this type.

This «Belief» blog can not seem to focus on faith (belief) issues: it always goes back to opinions about the elections and po.l.i.t.i.c.al.

There are some voters who don't see the election as a contest between two candidates who have differing opinions on nuanced, complicated economic, diplomatic and social issues, but as one between a candidate who is against abortion, and one who supports a woman's right to have one.

@Frogist I'm still waiting for the gov» t to finally ask everyone their opinions on every issue instead of giving us the runaround, the cold shoulder, and more politicians that do not actually represent us or our interests.

The fact is that the two questions regularly posed over the past ten years do not allow us to understand the state of public opinion on a whole range of issues associated with homosexual marriage and parenting.

It seems, moreover, on the basis of public opinion polls, that this challenge is already accepted by a majority of our fellow citizens and thus the question of its establishment as a matter of law has not provoked a debate worthy of the momentous issues at stake.

The fact is that the two questions regularly posed over the last ten years do not allow us to understand the state of public opinion on a whole range of issues associated with homosexual marriage and parenting.

In short, if there is any wholesale shift of Jewish opinion on church - state issues from a separationist point of view to an equal treatment or greater involvement point of view, it is not yet visible.

Since you seemingly think that Wenger should focus on his job instead of having an opinion about politics in the country he lives and works in (regarding an issue which would definitely affect his work situation) I'm guessing your work is to write about politics on blogs where it doesn't belong — or would that be an incorrect assumption?

IMPORTANT: If you choose to express your opinion on this issue, including on social media, we ask that you do not wear LSU gear or use LSU branding.

A recent poll suggests 90 percent of Native Americans are not offended by the nickname of Washington's NFL franchise, but that's not going to change my opinion on this hot - button, societal issue

simple, we were top of table more than any other team last year, only loss in back that started was sagna, we managed last year w arteta & flamini, of course I want to strengthen there, but the glaring issue to me is at striker, we have a full complement of good to mediocre strikers, adequate but not going to compete season long against city and chelsea, in my opinion, back line fine, DM needs upgrading, attacking midfield strongest in EPL, central striker??? put a thierry henri on this squad in his prime, we win the league,

I don't see the point going on about the striker issue, flogging a dead horse in my opinion... if we did not get a striker in the summer why will any rational person think we will get one now?